Difference between revisions of "C78 1752"
From Waalt
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
| | | | ||
| C78/1965, no. 7 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no1965/IMG_0116.htm] | | C78/1965, no. 7 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no1965/IMG_0116.htm] | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
|- | |- | ||
Revision as of 17:45, 9 May 2015
| Overall C78 page [1] Major Contributor(s): Robert C. Palmer Minor Contributors please initial relevant rows |
| Cal_Year | Cal_Date | Regnal_Year | Parties | Subject Matter | Roll/Case_No. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1752 | C78/, no. [] | |||||
| 1752 | 12 June | 26 | Thomas Newnam barber and peruke maker; and Mary Talbot spinster on behalf of themselves and other creditors of Thomas Vaughan late of the Inner Temple, London, attorney at law v. Jane Vaughan, widow; and Elizabeth Vaughan, spinster, executrices of said Thomas Vaughan; William Vaughan; Thomas Vaughan; Ann Vaughan; and Jane Vaughan the younger children of said Thomas Vaughan deceased; Sir Henry Blunt baronet; and Albany Wallis, gentleman | C78/1965, no. 7 [2] | ||
| 1752 | 4 Dec | 26 | Joseph Browne and Sarah Langhorne spinster executors and devisees and also executrix of William Hode esq her late husband v. John Howe esq brother and devisee of William Howe esq and Catherine Howe widow and executrix of William Howe; Edward Browne esq; and Joseph Coombe & Frances his wife, which said Edward Browne and Frances Coombe are heirs at law of the said William Strode; Jane Langhorne, spinster; Neice and heir at law of said Jane Strode an infant by her guardian | C78/1955, no. 5 [3] |
