Difference between revisions of "C78 1752"
From Waalt
Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
|- | |- | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ! 1752 | ||
+ | | 7 April | ||
+ | | 25 | ||
+ | | Henry Read esq v. Jonathan Knackstone the younger, son and heir and also executor of Jonathan Knackstone the elder his late father; George Moore & Sarah his wife; John Merriman; Thomas Hancock; and Francis Sheppard; and John Beale | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | C78/1887, no. 5 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no1887/IMG_0527.htm] | ||
+ | |- | ||
! 1752 | ! 1752 |
Revision as of 17:30, 13 September 2015
Overall C78 page [1] Major Contributor(s): Robert C. Palmer Minor Contributors please initial relevant rows |
Cal_Year | Cal_Date | Regnal_Year | Parties | Subject Matter | Roll/Case_No. | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1752 | C78/, no. [] | |||||
1752 | 11 Feb | 25 | John Webb grandson and heir at law of John Webb late of Chew Stoke, Som, gentleman v. John Webb brother and devisee of Thomas Webb and Christopher Budge clerk & Mary his wife late Mary Webb widow | C78/1888, no. 3 [2] | ||
1752 | 17 March | 25 | Alexander Hume of Sackvill Street, St James Westminster, Middx, esq v. Roger Holland; John Browning; George Scott; and Joseph Cole | C78/1890, no. 2 [3] | ||
1752 | 7 April | 25 | Henry Read esq v. Jonathan Knackstone the younger, son and heir and also executor of Jonathan Knackstone the elder his late father; George Moore & Sarah his wife; John Merriman; Thomas Hancock; and Francis Sheppard; and John Beale | C78/1887, no. 5 [4] | ||
1752 | 16 May | 25 | Francis Buller esq and Dame Mary Carew widow and relict of Sir Coventry Carew baronet v. Reginald Pole esq | C78/1951, no. 1 [5] | ||
1752 | 12 June | 26 | Thomas Newnam barber and peruke maker; and Mary Talbot spinster on behalf of themselves and other creditors of Thomas Vaughan late of the Inner Temple, London, attorney at law v. Jane Vaughan, widow; and Elizabeth Vaughan, spinster, executrices of said Thomas Vaughan; William Vaughan; Thomas Vaughan; Ann Vaughan; and Jane Vaughan the younger children of said Thomas Vaughan deceased; Sir Henry Blunt baronet; and Albany Wallis, gentleman | C78/1965, no. 7 [6] | ||
1752 | 24 June | 26 | John Ford; Richard Ford clerk; Thomas Atwood the younger & Esther his wife; and Jane Ford widow | C78/1888, no. 4 [7] | ||
1752 | 15 July | 26 | Jonathan Peckard & Elizabeth his wife; Grace Podger; Ann Podger; Margaret Podger spinsters and four of the daughters of Abraham Podger late of Markley, Devon, yeoman & ELizabeth his wife both deceased v. James Podger | C78/1953, no. 4 [8] | ||
1752 | 24 July | 26 | Sir Philip York knight Attorney General at the relation of John Cooper doctor in divinity rector of Berkhamstead St Peter, Staffs; Thomas Ivingfield; and John Topping church wardens of the same parish v. Nathaniel Oldham and John Hand | C78/1952, no. 1 [9] | ||
1752 | 8 Nov | 25 | John Pitt lieutenenat colonel in his Majesty's first regiment of footguards v. Charles Cholmondeley esq and Thomas Pitt esq | C78/1943, no. 2 [10] | ||
1752 | 4 Dec | 26 | Joseph Browne and Sarah Langhorne spinster executors and devisees and also executrix of William Hode esq her late husband v. John Howe esq brother and devisee of William Howe esq and Catherine Howe widow and executrix of William Howe; Edward Browne esq; and Joseph Coombe & Frances his wife, which said Edward Browne and Frances Coombe are heirs at law of the said William Strode; Jane Langhorne, spinster; Neice and heir at law of said Jane Strode an infant by her guardian | C78/1955, no. 5 [11] | ||
1752 | 4 Dec | 26 | Catherine Andrews of Lincolns Inn Fields, Middx, widow; Mary Knollys of Winchester, widow the daughters and heirs at law of Thomas Gibson late of Lethbury London esq and also William Hall of Lincolns Inn Fields one of the creditors of Thomas Gibson and of Mr Henry Jacombe since deceased on behalf of themselves and all other creditors of said Thomas Gibson; and Henry Jacomb v. Richard Sutton; Oxinbridge Harwood; and Stephen Ashby esq | C78/1944, no. 1 [12] | ||
1752 | 15 Dec | 26 | William Spring Barlee of Clavering, Essex, gentleman v. Palgrave Barlee | C78/1944, no. 3 [13] |