STAC Davison

From Waalt

B Bill of Complaint Dr Demurrer A Answer Rn Replication Rr Rejoinder C Commission I Interrogatories D Deposition

Davison, John

  • STAC 5/D37/33 - B A R C I D - 35 Eliz - Somerset - John Davison v William Horton, Richard Comlyn et uxor , Nicholas Tucker
  • STAC 5/D9/7 - I - 34 Eliz - Somerset - John Davison v Richard Comlin et al
  • STAC 5/D19/7 - I D - 35 Eliz - Somerset - John Davison v William Horton et al

Davison, Richard

  • STAC 5/D39/20 - A - 31 Eliz - Richard Davison v William Fenwicke
  • STAC 5/D22/29 - I D - 31 Eliz - Richard Davison v William Fenwick Sr, Thomas Readhead et al
  • STAC 5/D22/40 - I D - 31 Eliz - Richard Davison v Anthony Felton, John Synkeler
  • STAC 7/20/11 - - - Richard Davison v Thomas Redhead

Davison, Richard

  • STAC 5/D34/35 - B A - 43 Eliz - Cheshire - Richard Davison v George Griffin et al
  • STAC 5/D30/30 - I D - 43 Eliz - Cheshire - Richard Davyson v George Griffin

Davison, Richard

  • STAC 5/D9/8 - B A Rn - 29 Eliz - Northumberland - Richard Daveson v John Davyson, Robert Lawson, Thomas Readhead, Thomas Bai..., Edward Marre, Owswen Fenwycke, Lionell Fenwicke, William Fenwicke, Isabell Heely, Gerrard Fenwicke, William Fenwicke, William Marre
  • STAC 5/D19/38 - I D - 29 Eliz - Northumberland - Richard Davyson v Thomas Bates et al

Davison, Robert

  • STAC 5/D23/38 - B A C - 31 Eliz - Robert Davyson, William Palen v James Baggely, Richard Batterson, William Pooler, John Butterton et al

Bevan Case Index

  • Davison v Davison - STAC 5/D9/8, STAC 5/D19/38, STAC 5/D22/29, STAC 5/D22/40, STAC 5/D39/20
  • Davison v Redhead - STAC 7/20/11

Notes, Additions and Corrections

  • Case Book BL Harley MS 2143 fo. 45r. Secretary Davison convicted for contempt against the Queen. Attorney Rex; Secretary Davison: for a contempt and imprisoning him being principal secretary and a privy counsellor for that he having a warrant signed with the Queen’s hand and direction given him by the Queen herself to pass it under the great seal and not to acquaint any person there with but to keep it secret until her further pleasure was known, he contrary to that did acquaint some of the privy council therewith and told them that Her Majesty’s pleasure was that the same should be executed which was done; before the Queen’s further pleasure was then known and without her privity; 1000 marks fine and remanded to the Tower there to remain at Her Majesty’s pleasure. Hillary 29 Elizabeth (kk)