Difference between revisions of "STAC Woodfall"
From Waalt
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
''' Woodfall, Anne ''' | ''' Woodfall, Anne ''' | ||
| − | *STAC 5/ | + | *STAC 5/W49/27 - B A - 16 Eliz - Shropshire - Anne Woodfall, John Woodfall v John Cuny, Thomas Burton et al |
| − | *STAC 5/ | + | *STAC 5/W34/32 - I D - 17 Eliz - Shropshire - Anne Woodfall, John Woodfall v John Cunye |
| + | **see [[STAC co Shropshire]] | ||
''' Attorney General ''' | ''' Attorney General ''' | ||
| Line 11: | Line 12: | ||
**see [[STAC co Lancaster]] | **see [[STAC co Lancaster]] | ||
| − | '''Notes, Additions and Corrections | + | ''' Notes, Additions and Corrections ''' |
Latest revision as of 10:21, 1 December 2022
B Bill of Complaint Dr Demurrer A Answer Rn Replication Rr Rejoinder
C Commission I Interrogatories D Deposition
Woodfall, Anne
- STAC 5/W49/27 - B A - 16 Eliz - Shropshire - Anne Woodfall, John Woodfall v John Cuny, Thomas Burton et al
- STAC 5/W34/32 - I D - 17 Eliz - Shropshire - Anne Woodfall, John Woodfall v John Cunye
Attorney General
- STAC 7/1/8 - - - Lancaster - AG (Edward Coke) v John Woodfalle, Adam Hayward, Edward Eccleston, William Standishe, et al
Notes, Additions and Corrections
