Difference between revisions of "STAC Battersby"
From Waalt
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
*STAC 5/B41/15 - I D - 31 Eliz - Anthony Battersbye v Richard Cholmeley, Oliver Tennante, Thomas Walker | *STAC 5/B41/15 - I D - 31 Eliz - Anthony Battersbye v Richard Cholmeley, Oliver Tennante, Thomas Walker | ||
*STAC 5/B38/21 - I D - 31 Eliz - Anthony Battersby v John Walker, John Craven et al | *STAC 5/B38/21 - I D - 31 Eliz - Anthony Battersby v John Walker, John Craven et al | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''Probably North Yorkshire''' | ||
Revision as of 13:47, 24 November 2012
Battersby, Anthony
- STAC 5/B24/38 - B - 30 Eliz - Anthony Battersbye v Robert Constable et uxor, Richard Cholmelye et al
- STAC 5/B67/11 - A Rn Rr Dr - 31 Eliz - Anthony Battersbye v Robert Constable, Richard Cholmley, Henry Clerkstone
- STAC 5/B68/1 - B A C - 31 Eliz - Anthony Battersby v Francis Cholmeley, John Walter, Richard Rooke et al
- STAC 5/B29/37 - B A C - 31 Eliz - Anthony Battersbie v Richard Cholemley, Robert Sedgwick et al
- STAC 5/B13/18 - I D - 31 Eliz - Anthony Battersbie v Richard Cholmondley, Robert Constable et al
- STAC 5/B41/15 - I D - 31 Eliz - Anthony Battersbye v Richard Cholmeley, Oliver Tennante, Thomas Walker
- STAC 5/B38/21 - I D - 31 Eliz - Anthony Battersby v John Walker, John Craven et al
Probably North Yorkshire
