Difference between revisions of "STAC Daubney"
From Waalt
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | ''' B ''' Bill of Complaint ''' Dr ''' Demurrer ''' A ''' Answer ''' Rn ''' Replication ''' Rr ''' Rejoinder | ||
| + | ''' C ''' Commission ''' I ''' Interrogatories ''' D ''' Deposition | ||
| + | <BR> <BR> | ||
| + | |||
''' Dawbney. Arthur ''' | ''' Dawbney. Arthur ''' | ||
| − | *STAC 5/D13/22 - B A Rr - 26 Eliz - Arthur Dawbney v Gerrard Gore, Thomas Gore et al | + | *STAC 5/D13/22 - B A Rr - 26 Eliz - Middlesex - Arthur Dawbney v Gerrard Gore, Thomas Gore et al |
| − | *STAC 5/D20/11 - R - Easter 26 Eliz - Arthur Dawbney v Gerrarde Gore, John Swinnerton, John Tedcastel et al | + | *STAC 5/D20/11 - R - Easter 26 Eliz - Middlesex - Arthur Dawbney v Gerrarde Gore, John Swinnerton, John Tedcastel et al |
| − | *STAC 5/D21/25 - I D - 26 Eliz - Arthure Dawbeney v Reynold Williams, William Huband, John Tedcastle et al | + | *STAC 5/D21/25 - I D - 26 Eliz - Middlesex - Arthure Dawbeney v Reynold Williams, William Huband, John Tedcastle et al |
| − | *STAC 5/D10/23 - I D - 27 Eliz - Arthur Dawbneye v Gerard Gore, Thomas Gore, John Sommerton et al | + | *STAC 5/D10/23 - I D - 27 Eliz - Middlesex - Arthur Dawbneye v Gerard Gore, Thomas Gore, John Sommerton et al |
| + | **see [[STAC co Middlesex]] | ||
''' Dawbeney, Clement ''' | ''' Dawbeney, Clement ''' | ||
| − | *STAC 5/D35/12 - B - 42 Eliz - Clement Dawbeney v William Symonds, William Temple | + | *STAC 5/D35/12 - B - 42 Eliz - - Clement Dawbeney v William Symonds, William Temple |
| − | *STAC 5/D8/4 - I D - 42 Eliz - Clement Dawbney v William Symonds, William Temple | + | *STAC 5/D8/4 - I D - 42 Eliz - - Clement Dawbney v William Symonds, William Temple |
| − | *STAC 5/D33/33 - C I D - 42 Eliz - Clement Daubney v William Symonds et al | + | *STAC 5/D33/33 - C I D - 42 Eliz - - Clement Daubney v William Symonds et al |
| − | *STAC 5/D30/37 - I D - 43 Eliz - Clement Dawbney v William Symonds | + | *STAC 5/D30/37 - I D - 43 Eliz - - Clement Dawbney v William Symonds |
| − | + | **probably Surrey: see TNA C 2/Eliz/S5/30 William Symonds and John Ashe. v Clement Dawbeney and John Russell. For injunction and relief. One messuage, and divers lands and premises to the same belonging, in the parish of Farnham, Surrey, of which the complainants were ousted of possession by virtue of a writ of extent obtained through fraud and subornation of perjury, under a recognisance upon bond in the nature of a statute of the staple. | |
| − | |||
| − | * | ||
| − | |||
'''Notes, Additions and Corrections''' | '''Notes, Additions and Corrections''' | ||
Latest revision as of 19:04, 30 January 2024
B Bill of Complaint Dr Demurrer A Answer Rn Replication Rr Rejoinder
C Commission I Interrogatories D Deposition
Dawbney. Arthur
- STAC 5/D13/22 - B A Rr - 26 Eliz - Middlesex - Arthur Dawbney v Gerrard Gore, Thomas Gore et al
- STAC 5/D20/11 - R - Easter 26 Eliz - Middlesex - Arthur Dawbney v Gerrarde Gore, John Swinnerton, John Tedcastel et al
- STAC 5/D21/25 - I D - 26 Eliz - Middlesex - Arthure Dawbeney v Reynold Williams, William Huband, John Tedcastle et al
- STAC 5/D10/23 - I D - 27 Eliz - Middlesex - Arthur Dawbneye v Gerard Gore, Thomas Gore, John Sommerton et al
Dawbeney, Clement
- STAC 5/D35/12 - B - 42 Eliz - - Clement Dawbeney v William Symonds, William Temple
- STAC 5/D8/4 - I D - 42 Eliz - - Clement Dawbney v William Symonds, William Temple
- STAC 5/D33/33 - C I D - 42 Eliz - - Clement Daubney v William Symonds et al
- STAC 5/D30/37 - I D - 43 Eliz - - Clement Dawbney v William Symonds
- probably Surrey: see TNA C 2/Eliz/S5/30 William Symonds and John Ashe. v Clement Dawbeney and John Russell. For injunction and relief. One messuage, and divers lands and premises to the same belonging, in the parish of Farnham, Surrey, of which the complainants were ousted of possession by virtue of a writ of extent obtained through fraud and subornation of perjury, under a recognisance upon bond in the nature of a statute of the staple.
Notes, Additions and Corrections
