Difference between revisions of "C78 1802"

From Waalt
Line 30: Line 30:
 
|-
 
|-
  
 +
 +
 +
! 1802
 +
| 24 July
 +
| 42
 +
| Thomas Wallis v. John King
 +
|
 +
| C79/288, no. 7 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C79no288/IMG_0285.htm]
 +
|-
  
  
Line 49: Line 58:
 
|-
 
|-
  
 +
 +
 +
! 1802
 +
| 2 Oct
 +
| 42
 +
| John Smyth esq; John Upton esq & Florence his wife heretofore Florence Smyth spinster; and Thomas Upton an infant by John Upton his father v. Sir Hugh Smyth baronet and Dame Elizabeth Smythe widow
 +
|
 +
| C79/288, no. 6 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C79no288/IMG_0272.htm]
 +
|-
  
  

Revision as of 19:18, 19 January 2015

Overall C78 page [1]

Major Contributor(s): Robert C. Palmer

Minor Contributors please initial relevant rows

Cal_Year Cal_Date Regnal_Year Parties Subject Matter Roll/Case_No.
1802 C79/, no. []
1802 24 July 42 Thomas Wallis v. John King C79/299, no. 5 [2]
1802 24 July 42 Thomas Wallis v. John King C79/288, no. 7 [3]
1802 28 July Jane Morris wife of John Morris one of the defendants v. Rowland Stephenson; Edward David Batson; Edward Stephenson; John Stephenson; William Remington; John Smith; and the said John Morris C78/2081, no. 5 [4]
1802 2 Aug 42 John Rowland Sproute clerk & Ann his wife; and Thomas Cooke Burroughes clerk & Mary his wife v. Stephen Isaacson C79/299, no. 6 [5]
1802 2 Oct 42 John Smyth esq; John Upton esq & Florence his wife heretofore Florence Smyth spinster; and Thomas Upton an infant by John Upton his father v. Sir Hugh Smyth baronet and Dame Elizabeth Smythe widow C79/288, no. 6 [6]
1802 18 Nov 43 Hugh Byrne v. Charles Danby and Sir William Staines knight C79/299, no. 7 [7]
1802 C78/, no. []