Difference between revisions of "STAC 5/R11-R15"
From Waalt
m |
|||
| (8 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | ''' B ''' Bill of Complaint ''' Dr ''' Demurrer ''' A ''' Answer ''' Rn ''' Replication ''' Rr ''' Rejoinder | ||
| + | ''' C ''' Commission ''' I ''' Interrogatories ''' D ''' Deposition | ||
| + | <BR> <BR> | ||
| + | |||
'''R11''' | '''R11''' | ||
| − | *STAC 5/R11/1 - A - 33 Eliz - - John Richards v Robert Merricke, Thomas Langlye | + | *STAC 5/R11/1 - A - 33 Eliz - - John Richards v Robert Merricke, Thomas Langlye - [[STAC Richard]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R11/2 - A - 38 Eliz - - Robert Raynes, Edward Symms, Humfrey Thompson, Thomas Scarlett, Bartholomew Neale, Roger Haynes, Thomas Reade v Richard Scochie et al | + | *STAC 5/R11/2 - A - 38 Eliz - - Robert Raynes, Edward Symms, Humfrey Thompson, Thomas Scarlett, Bartholomew Neale, Roger Haynes, Thomas Reade v Richard Scochie et al - [[STAC Raynes]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R11/3 - Dr - 32 Eliz - - William Rogers v Thomas Rosser, Traherne Lewellin | + | *STAC 5/R11/3 - Dr - 32 Eliz - Glamorgan - William Rogers v Thomas Rosser, Traherne Lewellin - [[STAC co Glamorgan]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R11/4 - A - 39 Eliz - - Nicholas Roles v Brian Newton, William Whitlach | + | *STAC 5/R11/4 - A - 39 Eliz - - Nicholas Roles v Brian Newton, William Whitlach - [[STAC Rolle]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R11/5 - I - 27 Eliz - - John de Ryvera v Hipoliyo Byamonti | + | *STAC 5/R11/5 - I - 27 Eliz - - John de Ryvera v Hipoliyo Byamonti - [[STAC Revera]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R11/6 - B A - 28 Eliz - - William Rowley v John Catesbye, William Beche et al | + | *STAC 5/R11/6 - B A - 28 Eliz - - William Rowley v John Catesbye, William Beche et al - [[STAC Rowley]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R11/7 - Rn - 20 Eliz - - John Robyns v Peter Dormer, Peter Neale | + | *STAC 5/R11/7 - Rn - 20 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - John Robyns v Peter Dormer, Peter Neale - [[STAC co Buckingham]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R11/8 - B A C - 40 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Richard Rylye v John Croker, John Bonner et al | + | *STAC 5/R11/8 - B A C - 40 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Richard Rylye v John Croker, John Bonner et al - [[STAC co Oxford]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R11/9 - B A C I D - 27 Eliz - Yorkshire - John Rayne v Lawrence Garstell, Thomas Garstell et al | + | *STAC 5/R11/9 - B A C I D - 27 Eliz - Yorkshire NR - John Rayne v Lawrence Garstell, Thomas Garstell et al - [[STAC co York NR]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R11/10 - I D - 37 Eliz - - Francis Rogers v Matthew Fitzherbert, Arthur Gregorie et al | + | *STAC 5/R11/10 - I D - 37 Eliz - - Francis Rogers v Matthew Fitzherbert, Arthur Gregorie et al - [[STAC Rogers]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R11/11 - B A - 15 Eliz - - Jasper Rutter v Edward Lawton | + | *STAC 5/R11/11 - B A - 15 Eliz - - Jasper Rutter v Edward Lawton - [[STAC Rutter]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R11/12 - C I D - 42 Eliz - - Anne Rowley v William Millingham, Edward Pratte alias Bratle | + | *STAC 5/R11/12 - C I D - 42 Eliz - - Anne Rowley v William Millingham, Edward Pratte alias Bratle - [[STAC Rowley]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R11/13 - D - 21 Eliz - - William Revell v Matthew Chambers | + | *STAC 5/R11/13 - D - 21 Eliz - - William Revell v Matthew Chambers - [[STAC Revell]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R11/14 - B A Rn - 30 Eliz - - Richard Rowe v Henry Crane, Thomas Crane, John Crane, Richard Dart alias Blewett | + | *STAC 5/R11/14 - B A Rn - 30 Eliz - - Richard Rowe v Henry Crane, Thomas Crane, John Crane, Richard Dart alias Blewett - [[STAC Rowe]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R11/15 - B A C - 39 Eliz - - John Richardson alias Slater v Antony Chater, Bernard Dodds et al | + | *STAC 5/R11/15 - B A C - 39 Eliz - - John Richardson alias Slater v Antony Chater, Bernard Dodds et al - [[STAC Richardson]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R11/16 - B A C - 26 Eliz - - Peter Rashelye v Thomas Broke | + | *STAC 5/R11/16 - B A C - 26 Eliz - - Peter Rashelye v Thomas Broke - [[STAC Rashley]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R11/17 - B - 8 Eliz - - John Rowe v John Serell Sr, John Serell Jr, John Gawdie et al | + | *STAC 5/R11/17 - B - 8 Eliz - - John Rowe v John Serell Sr, John Serell Jr, John Gawdie et al - [[STAC Rowe]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R11/18 - B A - 37 Eliz - - John Rodes v Anthony Ellis, Brian Ellis | + | *STAC 5/R11/18 - B A - 37 Eliz - - John Rodes v Anthony Ellis, Brian Ellis - [[STAC Rodes]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R11/19 - Rn - 20 Eliz - - Nicholas Richards v Richard Hunter, Alexander Pepper | + | *STAC 5/R11/19 - Rn - 20 Eliz - - Nicholas Richards v Richard Hunter, Alexander Pepper - [[STAC Richard]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R11/20 - Rn - 25 Eliz - - Robert Redge v Oliver Lloyd, Humfrey Jones et al | + | *STAC 5/R11/20 - Rn - 25 Eliz - - Robert Redge v Oliver Lloyd, Humfrey Jones et al - [[STAC Redge]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R11/21 - B A - 23 Eliz - - David John Rowe, William Davye alias Pendewas v Hugh Jones | + | *STAC 5/R11/21 - B A - 23 Eliz - - David John Rowe, William Davye alias Pendewas v Hugh Jones - [[STAC Rowe]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R11/22 - B A - 40 Eliz - - William Read v Thomas Willford, David Holliband et al | + | *STAC 5/R11/22 - B A - 40 Eliz - - William Read v Thomas Willford, David Holliband et al - [[STAC Read]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R11/23 - B A C - 41 Eliz - Yorkshire - William Readman v Francis Pattrickson, Richard Wilson et al | + | *STAC 5/R11/23 - B A C - 41 Eliz - Yorkshire WR - William Readman v Francis Pattrickson, Richard Wilson et al - [[STAC co York WR]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R11/24 - I D - 24 Eliz - - James Rither v William Clarke alias Bradley et al | + | *STAC 5/R11/24 - I D - 24 Eliz - Yorkshire WR - James Rither v William Clarke alias Bradley et al - [[STAC co York WR]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R11/25 - B A - 43 Eliz - - George Rodney v William Newland, William Welshman et al | + | *STAC 5/R11/25 - B A - 43 Eliz - - George Rodney v William Newland, William Welshman et al - [[STAC Rodney]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R11/26 - B A - 17 Eliz - - James Ryther, William Plumpton v Matthew Redman, Richard Travers et al | + | *STAC 5/R11/26 - B A - 17 Eliz - Yorkshire WR - James Ryther, William Plumpton v Matthew Redman, Richard Travers et al - [[STAC co York WR]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R11/27 - B A - 39 Eliz - - Antony Rowdon v Humfrey Cornwall, Richard Badham et al | + | *STAC 5/R11/27 - B A - 39 Eliz - - Antony Rowdon v Humfrey Cornwall, Richard Badham et al - [[STAC Rowdon]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R11/28 - B A - 37 Eliz - - William Rothwell v Nicholas Tonge, Richard Tonge, Reynold Wood et al | + | *STAC 5/R11/28 - B A - 37 Eliz - - William Rothwell v Nicholas Tonge, Richard Tonge, Reynold Wood et al - [[STAC Rothwell]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R11/29 - A - 37 Eliz - - Richard Rochester v William Rochester et al | + | *STAC 5/R11/29 - A - 37 Eliz - - Richard Rochester v William Rochester et al - [[STAC Rochester]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R11/30 - B A - 38 Eliz - - Marshal Rooper v Henry Full, John Deymon et al | + | *STAC 5/R11/30 - B A - 38 Eliz - - Marshal Rooper v Henry Full, John Deymon et al - [[STAC Roper]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R11/31 - C I D - 23 Eliz - - John Richards et uxor v William Pettie, John Horselie et al | + | *STAC 5/R11/31 - C I D - 23 Eliz - - John Richards et uxor v William Pettie, John Horselie et al - [[STAC Richard]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R11/32 - B A - 15 Eliz - | + | *STAC 5/R11/32 - B A - 15 Eliz - - Margaret Roll v Henry Roll, George Roll, Walter Westlake et al - [[STAC Rolle]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R11/33 - B A C I D - 34 Eliz - - Peter Roos v William Cardynall, John Anderson | + | *STAC 5/R11/33 - B A C I D - 34 Eliz - - Peter Roos v William Cardynall, John Anderson - [[STAC Roos]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R11/34 - B A - 37 Eliz - - Thomas Reading v Thomas Brace, John Weyld | + | *STAC 5/R11/34 - B A - 37 Eliz - - Thomas Reading v Thomas Brace, John Weyld - [[STAC Reading]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R11/35 - B A Rn Rr - 8 Eliz - - William Randell v Thomas Smith, Edmund Helyar et al | + | *STAC 5/R11/35 - B A Rn Rr - 8 Eliz - - William Randell v Thomas Smith, Edmund Helyar et al - [[STAC Randall]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R11/36 - Dr - 39 Eliz - - John Raphe v Thomas Wyvell | + | *STAC 5/R11/36 - Dr - 39 Eliz - Cornwall - John Raphe v Thomas Wyvell - [[STAC co Cornwall]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R11/37 - A - 40 Eliz - - Thomas Reresby v Ralph Critch, Henry Humlock | + | *STAC 5/R11/37 - A - 40 Eliz - - Thomas Reresby v Ralph Critch, Henry Humlock - [[STAC Reresby]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R11/38 - B | + | *STAC 5/R11/38 - B - 39 Eliz - Gloucestershire - Thomas Rookewood v Henry Permiter, Richard Wicksted et al - [[STAC co Gloucester]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R11/39 - B A Rn Rr - 24 Eliz - - Francis Raynsford v Hercules Raynsford et uxor, Margaret Raynsford et al | + | *STAC 5/R11/39 - B A Rn Rr - 24 Eliz - - Francis Raynsford v Hercules Raynsford et uxor, Margaret Raynsford et al - [[STAC Rainsford]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R11/40 - I D - 43 Eliz - - Edward Rowle v Nicholas Morgan, John Reyve et al | + | *STAC 5/R11/40 - I D - 43 Eliz - Kent - Edward Rowle v Nicholas Morgan, John Reyve et al - [[STAC co Kent]] |
| − | '' | + | ‘''R12 - Boxed STAC 5/R12/1-40 ''' |
| − | *STAC 5/R12/1 - B A Dr - 33 Eliz - - Robert Ramsden v Arthur Sothell alias Marshe, Thomas Marshall et al | + | *STAC 5/R12/1 - B A Dr - 33 Eliz - - Robert Ramsden v Arthur Sothell alias Marshe, Thomas Marshall et al - [[STAC Ramsden]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R12/2 - B A - 20 Eliz - - Henry Rolle v Valentine Rolle et al | + | *STAC 5/R12/2 - B A - 20 Eliz - - Henry Rolle v Valentine Rolle et al - [[STAC Rolle]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R12/3 - C I D - 17 Eliz - - Richard Rogers v Richard Grenacres, John Foster et al | + | *STAC 5/R12/3 - C I D - 17 Eliz - Yorkshire NR - Richard Rogers v Richard Grenacres, John Foster et al - [[STAC co York NR]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R12/4 - I D - 15 Eliz - - Richard Reeve v Thomas Grene | + | *STAC 5/R12/4 - I D - 15 Eliz - Norfolk - Richard Reeve v Thomas Grene - [[STAC co Norfolk]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R12/5 - B A - 36 Eliz - - Rees ap Robert v Rees ap Thomas, Thomas ap Williams et al | + | *STAC 5/R12/5 - B A - 36 Eliz - - Rees ap Robert v Rees ap Thomas, Thomas ap Williams et al - [[STAC Welsh names R]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R12/6 - I D - 24 Eliz - - William Rigdon v Robert Waringe, John Flower et al | + | *STAC 5/R12/6 - I D - 24 Eliz - - William Rigdon v Robert Waringe, John Flower et al - [[STAC Rigdon]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R12/7 - D - 7 Eliz - Kent - Thomas Rolf v Inhabitants of Sandwich | + | *STAC 5/R12/7 - D - 7 Eliz - Kent - Thomas Rolf v Inhabitants of Sandwich - [[STAC co Kent]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R12/8 - I D - 44 Eliz - London - Matthew Rutten, Abraham Rutten v Andrew Hill | + | *STAC 5/R12/8 - I D - 44 Eliz - London - Matthew Rutten, Abraham Rutten v Andrew Hill - [[STAC co London]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R12/9 - B A - 31 Eliz - - John Raishley Sr v John Raishley Jr | + | *STAC 5/R12/9 - B A - 31 Eliz - Cornwall - John Raishley Sr v John Raishley Jr - [[STAC co Cornwall]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R12/10 - I D - 12 Eliz - - Thomas Ridlye v Richard Geery, Richard Russell et al | + | *STAC 5/R12/10 - I D - 12 Eliz - Shropshire - Thomas Ridlye v Richard Geery, Richard Russell et al - [[STAC co Shropshire]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R12/11 - B A Rn C I D - 30 Eliz - - John Rumsey v Henry Mondaye, John Smith et al | + | *STAC 5/R12/11 - B A Rn C I D - 30 Eliz - - John Rumsey v Henry Mondaye, John Smith et al - [[STAC Romsey]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R12/12 - B A - 23 Eliz - - John Rodforde v Henry Ringwood, Charles Gose | + | *STAC 5/R12/12 - B A - 23 Eliz - - John Rodforde v Henry Ringwood, Charles Gose - [[STAC Rodford]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R12/13 - B - 36 Eliz - - Reynold Ruther v William ap Humfrey ap David, Humfrey David Loid et al | + | *STAC 5/R12/13 - B - 36 Eliz - Caernarvon - Reynold Ruther v William ap Humfrey ap David, Humfrey David Loid et al - [[STAC co Caernarvon]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R12/14 - B A Rn - 30 Eliz - - Thomas ap Rice v John Morgan, Harry ap Griffith et al | + | *STAC 5/R12/14 - B A Rn - 30 Eliz - Carmarthen - Thomas ap Rice v John Morgan, Harry ap Griffith et al - [[STAC co Carmarthen]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R12/15 - I D - 30 Eliz - - William Radcliffe v Richard Vaughan et uxor | + | *STAC 5/R12/15 - I D - 30 Eliz - Lancashire - William Radcliffe v Richard Vaughan et uxor - [[STAC co Lancaster]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R12/16 - B A Rn Rr - 13 Eliz - - Thomas Rufford v William Higbed Sr, Thomas Higbed Jr, John Weste et al | + | *STAC 5/R12/16 - B A Rn Rr - 13 Eliz - - Thomas Rufford v William Higbed Sr, Thomas Higbed Jr, John Weste et al - [[STAC Rufford]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R12/17 - C I D - 40 Eliz - - John Rodes v Bryan Ellis | + | *STAC 5/R12/17 - C I D - 40 Eliz - - John Rodes v Bryan Ellis - [[STAC Rodes]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R12/18 - I D - 44 Eliz - - Thomas Rude v Edmund Mervyn et al | + | *STAC 5/R12/18 - I D - 44 Eliz - - Thomas Rude v Edmund Mervyn et al - [[STAC Rude]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R12/19 - I D - 35 Eliz - - Jenkin David Ricket et al v Hysone Bache, Rowland Rice et al | + | *STAC 5/R12/19 - I D - 35 Eliz - - Jenkin David Ricket et al v Hysone Bache, Rowland Rice et al - [[STAC Rickett]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R12/20 - B Dr - 32 Eliz - - Owen Radcliffe v Christopher Meade | + | *STAC 5/R12/20 - B Dr - 32 Eliz - London - Owen Radcliffe v Christopher Meade - [[STAC co London]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R12/21 - I - 34 Eliz - - Huntlane Ratsey v Margaret Everlde, Thomas Smith et al | + | *STAC 5/R12/21 - I - 34 Eliz - - Huntlane Ratsey v Margaret Everlde, Thomas Smith et al - [[STAC Ratsey]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R12/22 - B - 25 Eliz - - Robert Russell v John Collyn, William Collyn, William Parker et al | + | *STAC 5/R12/22 - B - 25 Eliz - - Robert Russell v John Collyn, William Collyn, William Parker et al - [[STAC Russell]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R12/23 - I D - 1 Eliz - Middlesex - Christopher Rythe v Edward Boys et al | + | *STAC 5/R12/23 - I D - 1 Eliz - Middlesex - Christopher Rythe v Edward Boys et al - [[STAC co Middlesex]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R12/24 - B A - 7 Eliz - - John Rawleigh v John Yearde, Harry Yearde, Richard Gale et al | + | *STAC 5/R12/24 - B A - 7 Eliz - - John Rawleigh v John Yearde, Harry Yearde, Richard Gale et al - [[STAC Raleigh]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R12/25 - I D - 43 Eliz - - Richard Rylie v Ralph Sheldon et al | + | *STAC 5/R12/25 - I D - 43 Eliz - Warwickshire - Richard Rylie v Ralph Sheldon et al - [[STAC co Warwick]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R12/26 - I D - 24 Eliz - - Geffere Rowlye v Andrew Beeche, James Rowlye | + | *STAC 5/R12/26 - I D - 24 Eliz - - Geffere Rowlye v Andrew Beeche, James Rowlye - [[STAC Rowley]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R12/27 - B A Rn - 13 Eliz - - George Rolleston, Thomas Rowbotham, William Flint, Richard Flint, John Jackson v Thomas Reresbye, Nicholas Rowbotham, Robert Colley, John Spencer et al | + | *STAC 5/R12/27 - B A Rn - 13 Eliz - - George Rolleston, Thomas Rowbotham, William Flint, Richard Flint, John Jackson v Thomas Reresbye, Nicholas Rowbotham, Robert Colley, John Spencer et al - [[STAC Rolleston]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R12/28 - B - 25 Eliz - - John Rogers v John Scudamore, John Jeffes Jr et al | + | *STAC 5/R12/28 - B - 25 Eliz - - John Rogers v John Scudamore, John Jeffes Jr et al - [[STAC Rogers]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R12/29 - B - 24 Eliz - - John Roll v Thomas Strowde, John Jackson et al | + | *STAC 5/R12/29 - B - 24 Eliz - - John Roll v Thomas Strowde, John Jackson et al - [[STAC Rolle]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R12/30 - I D - 42 Eliz - - John Randall v William Waltham, John Small | + | *STAC 5/R12/30 - I D - 42 Eliz - Dorset - John Randall v William Waltham, John Small - [[STAC co Dorset]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R12/31 - I D - 39 Eliz - - George Richards v Thomas Philpott, Luke Phillpott, Lawrence Charlocke et al | + | *STAC 5/R12/31 - I D - 39 Eliz - - George Richards v Thomas Philpott, Luke Phillpott, Lawrence Charlocke et al - [[STAC Richard]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R12/32 - A - 29 Eliz - - William Rice v Francis Duffield, Edward Newburye et al | + | *STAC 5/R12/32 - A - 29 Eliz - - William Rice v Francis Duffield, Edward Newburye et al - [[STAC Rice]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R12/33 - I D - 19 Eliz - - William Reve v Robert Dodds, John Bond et al | + | *STAC 5/R12/33 - I D - 19 Eliz - - William Reve v Robert Dodds, John Bond et al - [[STAC Reeve]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R12/34 - I D - 27 Eliz - - John Russell v Ralph Shelden | + | *STAC 5/R12/34 - I D - 27 Eliz - Worcestershire - John Russell v Ralph Shelden - [[STAC co Worcester]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R12/35 - B A Rn - 41 Eliz - - Thomas Rea v Thomas Woodwarde, Thomas Drewe et al | + | *STAC 5/R12/35 - B A Rn - 41 Eliz - - Thomas Rea v Thomas Woodwarde, Thomas Drewe et al - [[STAC Rea]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R12/36 - D - 8 Eliz - - Francis Rogers v Walter Morgan, Thomas Vaughan et al | + | *STAC 5/R12/36 - D - 8 Eliz - - Francis Rogers v Walter Morgan, Thomas Vaughan et al - [[STAC Rogers]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R12/37 - B A C - 23 Eliz - - George Rosogan v William Beville, Peter Beville, John Balbery et al | + | *STAC 5/R12/37 - B A C - 23 Eliz - - George Rosogan v William Beville, Peter Beville, John Balbery et al - [[STAC Rosogan]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R12/38 - B A C - 27 Eliz - - Richard Reynell v William Langverie, William Peter et al | + | *STAC 5/R12/38 - B A C - 27 Eliz - - Richard Reynell v William Langverie, William Peter et al - [[STAC Reynell]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R12/39 - B - 23 Eliz - - John Raspole Jr v Edmund Coke, John Coke | + | *STAC 5/R12/39 - B - 23 Eliz - - John Raspole Jr v Edmund Coke, John Coke - [[STAC Raspole]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R12/40 - B A - 17 Eliz - - William Revett v Richard Snell, Ellen Snell, Thomas Rise et al | + | *STAC 5/R12/40 - B A - 17 Eliz - - William Revett v Richard Snell, Ellen Snell, Thomas Rise et al - [[STAC Rivett]] |
'''R13''' | '''R13''' | ||
| − | *STAC 5/R13/1 - Rr - 28 Eliz - - Nicholas Reed v Walter Hele, Robert Crocker et al | + | *STAC 5/R13/1 - Rr - 28 Eliz - - Nicholas Reed v Walter Hele, Robert Crocker et al - [[STAC Read]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R13/2 - I D - 42 Eliz - - William Richardson v Edmund Harewell, Thomas Tuffley et al | + | *STAC 5/R13/2 - I D - 42 Eliz - - William Richardson v Edmund Harewell, Thomas Tuffley et al - [[STAC Richardson]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R13/3 - B A Rn Rr - 25 Eliz - - John Bishop of Rochester v Robert Shepherd Sr, Robert Munfeld et al | + | *STAC 5/R13/3 - B A Rn Rr - 25 Eliz - - John Bishop of Rochester v Robert Shepherd Sr, Robert Munfeld et al - [[STAC Rochester]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R13/4 - I D - 23 Eliz - - Nicholas Raynes, Robert Thorpe v Arthur Topps et al | + | *STAC 5/R13/4 - I D - 23 Eliz - - Nicholas Raynes, Robert Thorpe v Arthur Topps et al - [[STAC Raynes]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R13/5 - B A Rn Rr C I D - 38 Eliz - - John Rushe v Thomas Russell | + | *STAC 5/R13/5 - B A Rn Rr C I D - 38 Eliz - - John Rushe v Thomas Russell - [[STAC Rush]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R13/6 - A Rn Rr - 20 Eliz - Sussex - John Rolfe v John Hebylthwaite, John Fagge et al | + | *STAC 5/R13/6 - A Rn Rr - 20 Eliz - Sussex - John Rolfe v John Hebylthwaite, John Fagge et al - [[STAC co Sussex]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R13/7 - B A - 43 Eliz - - William Rawlins v John Gaynford, William Hawley et al | + | *STAC 5/R13/7 - B A - 43 Eliz - - William Rawlins v John Gaynford, William Hawley et al - [[STAC Rawlins]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R13/8 - B A - 24 Eliz - - William Ramsey v Henry Anthony, John Gilbert et al | + | *STAC 5/R13/8 - B A - 24 Eliz - - William Ramsey v Henry Anthony, John Gilbert et al - [[STAC Ramsay]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R13/9 - B Dr Rn - 26 Eliz - - Robert Raunce v Robert Paine, Edolph Dingley | + | *STAC 5/R13/9 - B Dr Rn - 26 Eliz - - Robert Raunce v Robert Paine, Edolph Dingley - [[STAC Raunce]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R13/10 - B - 28 Eliz - - William Rice v Francis Duffeld, Edward Newbery et al | + | *STAC 5/R13/10 - B - 28 Eliz - - William Rice v Francis Duffeld, Edward Newbery et al - [[STAC Rice]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R13/11 - B A - 38 Eliz - - Richard Ryley v Thomas Androse | + | *STAC 5/R13/11 - B A - 38 Eliz - - Richard Ryley v Thomas Androse - [[STAC Riley]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R13/12 - B A C - 13 Eliz - - Morgan Rosse v William Herbert, William Morgan et al | + | *STAC 5/R13/12 - B A C - 13 Eliz - - Morgan Rosse v William Herbert, William Morgan et al - [[STAC Rosse]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R13/13 - B A - 38 Eliz - - William Reynell v Walter Burges, Anthony Pyke et al | + | *STAC 5/R13/13 - B A - 38 Eliz - - William Reynell v Walter Burges, Anthony Pyke et al - [[STAC Reynolds]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R13/14 - B A C - 28 Eliz - - James Rooe v John Dutton, Arnold Wirrall et al | + | *STAC 5/R13/14 - B A C - 28 Eliz - - James Rooe v John Dutton, Arnold Wirrall et al - [[STAC Rooe]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R13/15 - B A C - 10 Eliz - - Sir Thomas Ragland v George Keynston, William Bassett et al | + | *STAC 5/R13/15 - B A C - 10 Eliz - - Sir Thomas Ragland v George Keynston, William Bassett et al - [[STAC Ragland]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R13/16 - I D - 43 Eliz - - Edward Rowle v Richard Morgan et al | + | *STAC 5/R13/16 - I D - 43 Eliz - Kent - Edward Rowle v Richard Morgan et al - [[STAC co Kent]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R13/17 - I D - 24 Eliz - - Robert Reynwill alias Reynolds, Robert Cary, Thomas Cary v Richard Bowden, Roger Alley et al | + | *STAC 5/R13/17 - I D - 24 Eliz - - Robert Reynwill alias Reynolds, Robert Cary, Thomas Cary v Richard Bowden, Roger Alley et al - [[STAC Reynwill]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R13/18 - I D - 24 Eliz - - William Rydinge v John Byncke et al | + | *STAC 5/R13/18 - I D - 24 Eliz - - William Rydinge v John Byncke et al - [[STAC Riding]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R13/19 - Rr - 42 Eliz - - Thomas Rea v Thomas Woodward | + | *STAC 5/R13/19 - Rr - 42 Eliz - - Thomas Rea v Thomas Woodward - [[STAC Rea]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R13/20 - B A Rn Rr - 9 Eliz - - Thomas Rombolde v Robert Preston, Robert Brandon et al | + | *STAC 5/R13/20 - B A Rn Rr - 9 Eliz - Cambridgeshire - Thomas Rombolde v Robert Preston, Robert Brandon et al - [[STAC co Cambridge]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R13/21 - I D - 41 Eliz - - Thomas Rayner, Edward Brittridge v William Nicholls, John Bentlie | + | *STAC 5/R13/21 - I D - 41 Eliz - - Thomas Rayner, Edward Brittridge v William Nicholls, John Bentlie - [[STAC Rayner]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R13/22 - I D - 24 Eliz - - Thomas Restwicke v John Helgyn et al | + | *STAC 5/R13/22 - I D - 24 Eliz - - Thomas Restwicke v John Helgyn et al - [[STAC Restwick]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R13/23 - B - 37 Eliz - - John Richards v Philip John Rice, William Thomas et al | + | *STAC 5/R13/23 - B - 37 Eliz - - John Richards v Philip John Rice, William Thomas et al - [[STAC Richard]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R13/24 - B - 37 Eliz - Cornwall - Thomas Rosewarne v William Pendervas, John Matthewe et al | + | *STAC 5/R13/24 - B - 37 Eliz - Cornwall - Thomas Rosewarne v William Pendervas, John Matthewe et al - [[STAC co Cornwall]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R13/25 - B A - 35 Eliz - - Thomas Rampston v William Rowe, Stephen Hamon et al | + | *STAC 5/R13/25 - B A - 35 Eliz - - Thomas Rampston v William Rowe, Stephen Hamon et al - [[STAC Rampston]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R13/26 - B A C I D - 42 Eliz - - John Rodes v Godfrye Ashe, John Ashe et al | + | *STAC 5/R13/26 - B A C I D - 42 Eliz - - John Rodes v Godfrye Ashe, John Ashe et al - [[STAC Rodes]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R13/27 - B A C - 26 Eliz - - James Rooe v John Dutton, John Burton | + | *STAC 5/R13/27 - B A C - 26 Eliz - - James Rooe v John Dutton, John Burton - [[STAC Rooe]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R13/28 - I D - 35 Eliz - - Robert Rowe v Thomas Philips | + | *STAC 5/R13/28 - I D - 35 Eliz - - Robert Rowe v Thomas Philips - [[STAC Rowe]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R13/29 - I D - 24 Eliz - - Godfrey Robberds, Ralph Robberds, John Judy | + | *STAC 5/R13/29 - I D - 24 Eliz - - Godfrey Robberds, Ralph Robberds, John Judy - [[STAC Roberts]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R13/30 - Rr I D - 42 Eliz - - John Rodes v Francis Gregory, Robert Gregory et al | + | *STAC 5/R13/30 - Rr I D - 42 Eliz - - John Rodes v Francis Gregory, Robert Gregory et al - [[STAC Rodes]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R13/31 - I D - 25 Eliz - - Sir John Radcliffe v Gilbert Sherington, Ralph Worseley et al | + | *STAC 5/R13/31 - I D - 25 Eliz - - Sir John Radcliffe v Gilbert Sherington, Ralph Worseley et al - [[STAC Radcliffe]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R13/32 - I D - 24 Eliz - - Roger Revell v John Wilson, John Watts et al | + | *STAC 5/R13/32 - I D - 24 Eliz - - Roger Revell v John Wilson, John Watts et al - [[STAC Revell]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R13/33 - I D - 24 Eliz - - William Rydinge v Robert Rowberds | + | *STAC 5/R13/33 - I D - 24 Eliz - - William Rydinge v Robert Rowberds - [[STAC Riding]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R13/34 - I D - 44 Eliz - - John Rogers v William Gullye et al | + | *STAC 5/R13/34 - I D - 44 Eliz - Somerset - John Rogers v William Gullye et al - [[STAC co Somerset]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R13/35 - B - 29 Eliz - - Stephen Rogers v Elizabeth Porter alias Coxe, Philip Goodwyn et al | + | *STAC 5/R13/35 - B - 29 Eliz - - Stephen Rogers v Elizabeth Porter alias Coxe, Philip Goodwyn et al - [[STAC Rogers]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R13/36 - I D - 41 Eliz - - Richard Reason v Humfrey Gunson | + | *STAC 5/R13/36 - I D - 41 Eliz - - Richard Reason v Humfrey Gunson - [[STAC Reason]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R13/37 - I D - 24 Eliz - - David John Rawe, William Davy alias Pendervas v Hugh Jones | + | *STAC 5/R13/37 - I D - 24 Eliz - - David John Rawe, William Davy alias Pendervas v Hugh Jones - [[STAC Rowe]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R13/38 - I D - 24 Eliz - - William Roa v Humfry Lowe, George Hipkis | + | *STAC 5/R13/38 - I D - 24 Eliz - - William Roa v Humfry Lowe, George Hipkis - [[STAC Roa]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R13/39 - I D - 35 Eliz - - Francis Rowland v Thomas Gough | + | *STAC 5/R13/39 - I D - 35 Eliz - - Francis Rowland v Thomas Gough - [[STAC Rowland]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R13/40 - D - 38 Eliz - - Robert Readhead v John Banister | + | *STAC 5/R13/40 - D - 38 Eliz - - Robert Readhead v John Banister - [[STAC Redhead]] |
'''R14''' | '''R14''' | ||
| − | *STAC 5/R14/1 - B - 37 Eliz - - Bennett Rosewarne v John Maddrey, Robert Coade et al | + | *STAC 5/R14/1 - B - 37 Eliz - - Bennett Rosewarne v John Maddrey, Robert Coade et al - [[STAC Rosewarne]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R14/2 - B - 17 Eliz - - Thomas Richardson v John Carter et uxor | + | *STAC 5/R14/2 - B - 17 Eliz - - Thomas Richardson v John Carter et uxor - [[STAC Richardson]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R14/3 - I D - 36 Eliz - - Peter Randall v John Capelyn, Thomas Sewell | + | *STAC 5/R14/3 - I D - 36 Eliz - - Peter Randall v John Capelyn, Thomas Sewell - [[STAC Randall]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R14/4 - B A C I D - 34 Eliz - - James Roo v John Wilkinson, Adam Shawe et al | + | *STAC 5/R14/4 - B A C I D - 34 Eliz - Cheshire - James Roo v John Wilkinson, Adam Shawe et al - [[STAC co Chester]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R14/5 - B A Rn I D - 26 Eliz - - Henry Rolle v Joachim Rolle, George Rolle et al | + | *STAC 5/R14/5 - B A Rn I D - 26 Eliz - - Henry Rolle v Joachim Rolle, George Rolle et al - [[STAC Rolle]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R14/6 - Rr - 40 Eliz - - Nicholas Rolls v Bryan Newton, William Whitlacke | + | *STAC 5/R14/6 - Rr - 40 Eliz - - Nicholas Rolls v Bryan Newton, William Whitlacke - [[STAC Rolle]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R14/7 - I D - 39 Eliz - - William Randall, Philip Robinson v William Warner et al | + | *STAC 5/R14/7 - I D - 39 Eliz - - William Randall, Philip Robinson v William Warner et al - [[STAC Randall]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R14/8 - B A Dr - 29 Eliz - - Roger Robotham v John Eston, Thomas Snagge et al | + | *STAC 5/R14/8 - B A Dr - 29 Eliz - - Roger Robotham v John Eston, Thomas Snagge et al - [[STAC Robotham]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R14/9 - I D - 38 Eliz - - William Rigdon v John Flower | + | *STAC 5/R14/9 - I D - 38 Eliz - - William Rigdon v John Flower - [[STAC Rigdon]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R14/10 - I D - 38 Eliz - - Walter Rumsey v Thomas John David | + | *STAC 5/R14/10 - I D - 38 Eliz - - Walter Rumsey v Thomas John David - [[STAC Rumsey]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R14/11 - Rr - 40 Eliz - - George Richards v Lawrence Charlook, Timothy Philpott et al | + | *STAC 5/R14/11 - Rr - 40 Eliz - - George Richards v Lawrence Charlook, Timothy Philpott et al - [[STAC Richard]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R14/12 - Rn - 40 Eliz - - William Robins v Bartholomew Sampford et al | + | *STAC 5/R14/12 - Rn - 40 Eliz - - William Robins v Bartholomew Sampford et al - [[STAC Robins]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R14/13 - Rr - 37 Eliz - - Walter Rumsey v Andrew Powell et al | + | *STAC 5/R14/13 - Rr - 37 Eliz - - Walter Rumsey v Andrew Powell et al - [[STAC Rumsey]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R14/14 - Rn - 37 Eliz - - Stephen Rogers v Maurice Berklye et al | + | *STAC 5/R14/14 - Rn - 37 Eliz - - Stephen Rogers v Maurice Berklye et al - [[STAC Rogers]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R14/15 - B A C I D - 22 Eliz - - Simon Reynor v John Gabytus, Robert Styll | + | *STAC 5/R14/15 - B A C I D - 22 Eliz - - Simon Reynor v John Gabytus, Robert Styll - [[STAC Rayner]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R14/16 - B A Rn Rr - 3 Eliz - - Andrew Rede v Thomas Meade, John Turpin et al | + | *STAC 5/R14/16 - B A Rn Rr - 3 Eliz - - Andrew Rede v Thomas Meade, John Turpin et al - [[STAC Read]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R14/17 - B Dr - 23 Eliz - - James Rither v Antony Mawde | + | *STAC 5/R14/17 - B Dr - 23 Eliz - - James Rither v Antony Mawde - [[STAC Rither]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R14/18 - Rn - 37 Eliz - - Robert Rovers v Northe Harrison | + | *STAC 5/R14/18 - Rn - 37 Eliz - - Robert Rovers v Northe Harrison - [[STAC Rovers]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R14/19 - B - 34 Eliz - - John Raunce v William Mundaye | + | *STAC 5/R14/19 - B - 34 Eliz - - John Raunce v William Mundaye - [[STAC Raunce]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R14/20 - B A Rn Rr - 16 Eliz - - Richard Rogers v Richard Greenacres, John Foster et al | + | *STAC 5/R14/20 - B A Rn Rr - 16 Eliz - Yorkshire NR - Richard Rogers v Richard Greenacres, John Foster et al - [[STAC co York NR]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R14/21 - B A C I D - 35 Eliz - - John Rodes v Francis Rodes, Richard Draper et al | + | *STAC 5/R14/21 - B A C I D - 35 Eliz - - John Rodes v Francis Rodes, Richard Draper et al - [[STAC Rodes]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R14/22 - B - 28 Eliz - - Richard Rathebond v Godfrey Clarke, Thomas Clarke | + | *STAC 5/R14/22 - B - 28 Eliz - - Richard Rathebond v Godfrey Clarke, Thomas Clarke - [[STAC Rathbond]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R14/23 - I D - 25 Eliz - - Henry Rodde v John Taylour et al | + | *STAC 5/R14/23 - I D - 25 Eliz - - Henry Rodde v John Taylour et al - [[STAC Rodd]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R14/24 - I D - 38 Eliz - - Blanche Redge, Thomas Corbett v Robert Redge | + | *STAC 5/R14/24 - I D - 38 Eliz - Shropshire - Blanche Redge, Thomas Corbett v Robert Redge - [[STAC co Shropshire]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R14/25 - B A - 33 Eliz - - Owen Radcliffe v Christopher Meade, Adam Tabram et al | + | *STAC 5/R14/25 - B A - 33 Eliz - Cambridgeshire - Owen Radcliffe v Christopher Meade, Adam Tabram et al - [[STAC co Cambridge]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R14/26 - B - 36 Eliz - - Peter Rodes v Marmadule Kendall, Henry Kendall et al | + | *STAC 5/R14/26 - B - 36 Eliz - - Peter Rodes v Marmadule Kendall, Henry Kendall et al - [[STAC Rodes]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R14/27 - B - 17 Eliz - - John Ryves v Thomas Sidenham, Henry Sidenham et al | + | *STAC 5/R14/27 - B - 17 Eliz - - John Ryves v Thomas Sidenham, Henry Sidenham et al - [[STAC Rives]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R14/28 - B A Rn Rr - 16 Eliz - - Robert Recorde v Griffith Barrett, James Howell et al | + | *STAC 5/R14/28 - B A Rn Rr - 16 Eliz - - Robert Recorde v Griffith Barrett, James Howell et al - [[STAC Record]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R14/29 - A - 38 Eliz - - William Rochester v Richard Rochester, Josias Kirton et al | + | *STAC 5/R14/29 - A - 38 Eliz - - William Rochester v Richard Rochester, Josias Kirton et al - [[STAC Rochester]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R14/30 - B A Rr - 37 Eliz - - George Rider v Michael Cobb, Robert Jacob et al | + | *STAC 5/R14/30 - B A Rr - 37 Eliz - - George Rider v Michael Cobb, Robert Jacob et al - [[STAC Rider]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R14/31 - B A C I D - 43 Eliz - - William Rawson v Sir George Farmor, Francis Morgan et al | + | *STAC 5/R14/31 - B A C I D - 43 Eliz - - William Rawson v Sir George Farmor, Francis Morgan et al - [[STAC Rawson]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R14/32 - Rr - 39 Eliz - - John Rodes et al v Humfrey Pype, Richard Denham et al | + | *STAC 5/R14/32 - Rr - 39 Eliz - - John Rodes et al v Humfrey Pype, Richard Denham et al - [[STAC Rodes]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R14/33 - D - 43 Eliz - - Richard Ryley v Lionel French, Thomas Robbins et al | + | *STAC 5/R14/33 - D - 43 Eliz - - Richard Ryley v Lionel French, Thomas Robbins et al - [[STAC Riley]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R14/34 - B - 19 Eliz - - Thomas ap Roger v Davie ap Hugh, Henry Davie et al | + | *STAC 5/R14/34 - B - 19 Eliz - Denbigh - Thomas ap Roger v Davie ap Hugh, Henry Davie et al - [[STAC co Denbigh]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R14/35 - I D - 38 Eliz - - John Rodes et al v Edward Wilson, John Wright | + | *STAC 5/R14/35 - I D - 38 Eliz - - John Rodes et al v Edward Wilson, John Wright - [[STAC Rodes]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R14/36 - C I D - 42 Eliz - - Anne Rowley v Edward Pratt alias Bratt, William Millingham et al | + | *STAC 5/R14/36 - C I D - 42 Eliz - - Anne Rowley v Edward Pratt alias Bratt, William Millingham et al - [[STAC Rowley]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R14/37 - I - 36 Eliz - Somerset - Philip Radybone v John Chicke, Edmund Hoddy | + | *STAC 5/R14/37 - I - 36 Eliz - Somerset - Philip Radybone v John Chicke, Edmund Hoddy - [[STAC co Somerset]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R14/38 - B - 25 Eliz - - Dyonise Rawden, John Kyllingebeck v John Nunes, Robert Crowe et al | + | *STAC 5/R14/38 - B - 25 Eliz - - Dyonise Rawden, John Kyllingebeck v John Nunes, Robert Crowe et al - [[STAC Rawden]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R14/39 - B A - 29 Eliz - - William Roche v John Vivian, Christopher Nevis | + | *STAC 5/R14/39 - B A - 29 Eliz - - William Roche v John Vivian, Christopher Nevis - [[STAC Roche]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R14/40 - I D - 44 Eliz - - Robert Robinson v John Kiblewhite, William Essex et al | + | *STAC 5/R14/40 - I D - 44 Eliz - - Robert Robinson v John Kiblewhite, William Essex et al - [[STAC Robinson]] |
'''R15''' | '''R15''' | ||
| − | *STAC 5/R15/1 - I D - 39 Eliz - - William Read v John Markham Sr, John Markham Jr, Roger Booth et al | + | *STAC 5/R15/1 - I D - 39 Eliz - London - William Read v John Markham Sr, John Markham Jr, Roger Booth et al - [[STAC co London]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R15/2 - C I D - 5 Eliz - - Henry, Earl of Rutland v William Darrell, Roger Foen et al | + | *STAC 5/R15/2 - C I D - 5 Eliz - Wiltshire - Henry, Earl of Rutland v William Darrell, Roger Foen et al - [[STAC co Wiltshire]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R15/3 - B - 43 Eliz - - John Rudstone v William Browne, Richard Browne et al | + | *STAC 5/R15/3 - B - 43 Eliz - - John Rudstone v William Browne, Richard Browne et al - [[STAC Rudstone]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R15/4 - C I D - 37 Eliz - - Thomas Rosseter v Bartholomew Garwell, John Garwell et al | + | *STAC 5/R15/4 - C I D - 37 Eliz - - Thomas Rosseter v Bartholomew Garwell, John Garwell et al - [[STAC Rossiter]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R15/5 - Rr - 35 Eliz - - Thomas Rudgeway v William Ley | + | *STAC 5/R15/5 - Rr - 35 Eliz - - Thomas Rudgeway v William Ley - [[STAC Rudgeway]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R15/6 - I D - 34 Eliz - - Nicholas Raynton v Paul Tracie, William Huntlie et al | + | *STAC 5/R15/6 - I D - 34 Eliz - - Nicholas Raynton v Paul Tracie, William Huntlie et al - [[STAC Raynton]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R15/7 - I D - 44 Eliz - - Thomas Reade v John Pescod, John Hersey et al | + | *STAC 5/R15/7 - I D - 44 Eliz - - Thomas Reade v John Pescod, John Hersey et al - [[STAC Read]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R15/8 - B A I D - 33 Eliz - - Giles Rainsford v Thomas Westcott et al | + | *STAC 5/R15/8 - B A I D - 33 Eliz - - Giles Rainsford v Thomas Westcott et al - [[STAC Rainsford]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R15/9 - Rr - 37 Eliz - - John Rogers v Thomas Staunton, Jane Walforde | + | *STAC 5/R15/9 - Rr - 37 Eliz - - John Rogers v Thomas Staunton, Jane Walforde - [[STAC Rogers]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R15/10 - Rr - 35 Eliz - - Richard Rither, Henry Lane v William Gardener, Henry Draper et al | + | *STAC 5/R15/10 - Rr - 35 Eliz - - Richard Rither, Henry Lane v William Gardener, Henry Draper et al - [[STAC Rither]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R15/11 - Rr - 35 Eliz - Hampshire - Henry Ringewood v John Bulkeley, Thomas Charnell | + | *STAC 5/R15/11 - Rr - 35 Eliz - Hampshire - Henry Ringewood v John Bulkeley, Thomas Charnell - [[STAC co Hampshire]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R15/12 - I D - 23 Eliz - - John Rosell v Henry Parr | + | *STAC 5/R15/12 - I D - 23 Eliz - - John Rosell v Henry Parr - [[STAC Russell]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R15/13 - C I D - 32 Eliz - - Thomas Radcliffe v John Watson et al | + | *STAC 5/R15/13 - C I D - 32 Eliz - - Thomas Radcliffe v John Watson et al - [[STAC Radcliffe]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R15/14 - B A - 36 Eliz - - George Ruggells v Edward Body, Thomas Cawson et al | + | *STAC 5/R15/14 - B A - 36 Eliz - - George Ruggells v Edward Body, Thomas Cawson et al - [[STAC Ruggell]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R15/15 - B A Rn C I D - 23 Eliz - - Henry Rodd v John Taylor, Robert Clench et al | + | *STAC 5/R15/15 - B A Rn C I D - 23 Eliz - - Henry Rodd v John Taylor, Robert Clench et al - [[STAC Rodd]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R15/16 - B A - 36 Eliz - - Francis Rowland Jr v Thomas Gough, Hugh Mores et al | + | *STAC 5/R15/16 - B A - 36 Eliz - - Francis Rowland Jr v Thomas Gough, Hugh Mores et al - [[STAC Rowland]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R15/17 - B A - 36 Eliz - - Nicholas Remart v Robert Boughier, Richard Tanvile | + | *STAC 5/R15/17 - B A - 36 Eliz - - Nicholas Remart v Robert Boughier, Richard Tanvile - [[STAC Remart]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R15/18 - B I D - 29 Eliz - - Nicholas Raynton v Paul Tracey, John Fryer et al | + | *STAC 5/R15/18 - B I D - 29 Eliz - - Nicholas Raynton v Paul Tracey, John Fryer et al - [[STAC Raynton]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R15/19 - B A - 24 Eliz - - Richard Reynell, Robert Carye, Thomas Carye v Roger Alley, Richard Bowden et al | + | *STAC 5/R15/19 - B A - 24 Eliz - - Richard Reynell, Robert Carye, Thomas Carye v Roger Alley, Richard Bowden et al - [[STAC Reynell]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R15/20 - B A C - 24 Eliz - - William Roa v William Wight, John Wight et al | + | *STAC 5/R15/20 - B A C - 24 Eliz - - William Roa v William Wight, John Wight et al - [[STAC Roa]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R15/21 - I D - 33 Eliz - - John Renman v John Wanyon | + | *STAC 5/R15/21 - I D - 33 Eliz - - John Renman v John Wanyon - [[STAC Remnam]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R15/22 - I D - 33 Eliz - - James Rayment v John Lambert et al | + | *STAC 5/R15/22 - I D - 33 Eliz - - James Rayment v John Lambert et al - [[STAC Rayment]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R15/23 - I D - 25 Eliz - - Hercules Ransforde v John Hollyocke | + | *STAC 5/R15/23 - I D - 25 Eliz - - Hercules Ransforde v John Hollyocke - [[STAC Rainsford]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R15/24 - I D - 35 Eliz - - Edmond Reynolds v William Searche | + | *STAC 5/R15/24 - I D - 35 Eliz - - Edmond Reynolds v William Searche - [[STAC Reynolds]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R15/25 - B A - 31 Eliz - - Robert Rithe v John North Sr, John North Jr, Daniel Payne et al | + | *STAC 5/R15/25 - B A - 31 Eliz - - Robert Rithe v John North Sr, John North Jr, Daniel Payne et al - [[STAC Rithe]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R15/26 - B A - 29 Eliz - - John Ryton v William Jones, William Groves et al | + | *STAC 5/R15/26 - B A - 29 Eliz - - John Ryton v William Jones, William Groves et al - [[STAC Ryton]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R15/27 - B A - 19 Eliz - - Thomas Risedon v Thomas Harvye | + | *STAC 5/R15/27 - B A - 19 Eliz - - Thomas Risedon v Thomas Harvye - [[STAC Risedon]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R15/28 - B Rn I D - 36 Eliz - - Thomas Rosseter v Bartholomew Garwell, John Garwell et al | + | *STAC 5/R15/28 - B Rn I D - 36 Eliz - - Thomas Rosseter v Bartholomew Garwell, John Garwell et al - [[STAC Rossiter]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R15/29 - B A C - 1 Eliz - - Thomas Reignold v John Nicholas, John Pellyone et al | + | *STAC 5/R15/29 - B A C - 1 Eliz - - Thomas Reignold v John Nicholas, John Pellyone et al - [[STAC Reynolds]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R15/30 - I D - 33 Eliz - London - Henry Robinson v Thomas Blighton et al | + | *STAC 5/R15/30 - I D - 33 Eliz - London - Henry Robinson v Thomas Blighton et al - [[STAC co London]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R15/31 - B A - 38 Eliz - - Lady Elizabeth Russell v Richard Lovelace, Robert Mathew et al | + | *STAC 5/R15/31 - B A - 38 Eliz - Berkshire - Lady Elizabeth Russell v Richard Lovelace, Robert Mathew et al. Report - [[STAC 5/R15/31r]] - [[STAC co Berkshire]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R15/32 - B - 18 Eliz - - William ap Rytherch v Rowland Wyne ap David ap Williams et al | + | *STAC 5/R15/32 - B - 18 Eliz - Caernarvon - William ap Rytherch v Rowland Wyne ap David ap Williams et al - [[STAC co Caernarvon]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R15/33 - B A - 38 Eliz - - Jevan ap Robert v, John Williams, Robert Prideaux et al | + | *STAC 5/R15/33 - B A - 38 Eliz - - Jevan ap Robert v, John Williams, Robert Prideaux et al - [[STAC Welsh names R]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R15/34 - B A - 19 Eliz - - Elizabeth Ryclethorne v Philip Cockerham et uxor, John Elyott et al | + | *STAC 5/R15/34 - B A - 19 Eliz - - Elizabeth Ryclethorne v Philip Cockerham et uxor, John Elyott et al - [[STAC Ricklethorn]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R15/35 - I D - 38 Eliz - - William Reynolds v Walter Burges, Anthony Peeke | + | *STAC 5/R15/35 - I D - 38 Eliz - - William Reynolds v Walter Burges, Anthony Peeke - [[STAC Reynolds]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R15/36 - B A - 44 Eliz - - William Robson et uxor | + | *STAC 5/R15/36 - B A - 44 Eliz - - William Robson et uxor v Thomas Bowne, Zachary Humfrey et al - [[STAC Robson]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R15/37 - B A Rn - 35 Eliz - - John Rudgeway v Bowyer Worsley, Richard Worsley et al | + | *STAC 5/R15/37 - B A Rn - 35 Eliz - - John Rudgeway v Bowyer Worsley, Richard Worsley et al - [[STAC Rudgeway]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R15/38 - B A C I D - 30 Eliz - - Stephen Rogers v Elizabeth Porter alias Cope, Philip Goodwin et al | + | *STAC 5/R15/38 - B A C I D - 30 Eliz - - Stephen Rogers v Elizabeth Porter alias Cope, Philip Goodwin et al - [[STAC Rogers]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R15/39 - I D - 13 Eliz - - John Rycall v John Newarke, Robert Noddall et al | + | *STAC 5/R15/39 - I D - 13 Eliz - - John Rycall v John Newarke, Robert Noddall et al - [[STAC Richall]] |
| − | *STAC 5/R15/40 - I D - 19 Eliz - - Sir John Ryvers v Thomas Willoughby, Edward Cranwell et al | + | *STAC 5/R15/40 - I D - 19 Eliz - - Sir John Ryvers v Thomas Willoughby, Edward Cranwell et al - [[STAC Rivers]] |
Latest revision as of 08:27, 20 May 2023
B Bill of Complaint Dr Demurrer A Answer Rn Replication Rr Rejoinder
C Commission I Interrogatories D Deposition
R11
- STAC 5/R11/1 - A - 33 Eliz - - John Richards v Robert Merricke, Thomas Langlye - STAC Richard
- STAC 5/R11/2 - A - 38 Eliz - - Robert Raynes, Edward Symms, Humfrey Thompson, Thomas Scarlett, Bartholomew Neale, Roger Haynes, Thomas Reade v Richard Scochie et al - STAC Raynes
- STAC 5/R11/3 - Dr - 32 Eliz - Glamorgan - William Rogers v Thomas Rosser, Traherne Lewellin - STAC co Glamorgan
- STAC 5/R11/4 - A - 39 Eliz - - Nicholas Roles v Brian Newton, William Whitlach - STAC Rolle
- STAC 5/R11/5 - I - 27 Eliz - - John de Ryvera v Hipoliyo Byamonti - STAC Revera
- STAC 5/R11/6 - B A - 28 Eliz - - William Rowley v John Catesbye, William Beche et al - STAC Rowley
- STAC 5/R11/7 - Rn - 20 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - John Robyns v Peter Dormer, Peter Neale - STAC co Buckingham
- STAC 5/R11/8 - B A C - 40 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Richard Rylye v John Croker, John Bonner et al - STAC co Oxford
- STAC 5/R11/9 - B A C I D - 27 Eliz - Yorkshire NR - John Rayne v Lawrence Garstell, Thomas Garstell et al - STAC co York NR
- STAC 5/R11/10 - I D - 37 Eliz - - Francis Rogers v Matthew Fitzherbert, Arthur Gregorie et al - STAC Rogers
- STAC 5/R11/11 - B A - 15 Eliz - - Jasper Rutter v Edward Lawton - STAC Rutter
- STAC 5/R11/12 - C I D - 42 Eliz - - Anne Rowley v William Millingham, Edward Pratte alias Bratle - STAC Rowley
- STAC 5/R11/13 - D - 21 Eliz - - William Revell v Matthew Chambers - STAC Revell
- STAC 5/R11/14 - B A Rn - 30 Eliz - - Richard Rowe v Henry Crane, Thomas Crane, John Crane, Richard Dart alias Blewett - STAC Rowe
- STAC 5/R11/15 - B A C - 39 Eliz - - John Richardson alias Slater v Antony Chater, Bernard Dodds et al - STAC Richardson
- STAC 5/R11/16 - B A C - 26 Eliz - - Peter Rashelye v Thomas Broke - STAC Rashley
- STAC 5/R11/17 - B - 8 Eliz - - John Rowe v John Serell Sr, John Serell Jr, John Gawdie et al - STAC Rowe
- STAC 5/R11/18 - B A - 37 Eliz - - John Rodes v Anthony Ellis, Brian Ellis - STAC Rodes
- STAC 5/R11/19 - Rn - 20 Eliz - - Nicholas Richards v Richard Hunter, Alexander Pepper - STAC Richard
- STAC 5/R11/20 - Rn - 25 Eliz - - Robert Redge v Oliver Lloyd, Humfrey Jones et al - STAC Redge
- STAC 5/R11/21 - B A - 23 Eliz - - David John Rowe, William Davye alias Pendewas v Hugh Jones - STAC Rowe
- STAC 5/R11/22 - B A - 40 Eliz - - William Read v Thomas Willford, David Holliband et al - STAC Read
- STAC 5/R11/23 - B A C - 41 Eliz - Yorkshire WR - William Readman v Francis Pattrickson, Richard Wilson et al - STAC co York WR
- STAC 5/R11/24 - I D - 24 Eliz - Yorkshire WR - James Rither v William Clarke alias Bradley et al - STAC co York WR
- STAC 5/R11/25 - B A - 43 Eliz - - George Rodney v William Newland, William Welshman et al - STAC Rodney
- STAC 5/R11/26 - B A - 17 Eliz - Yorkshire WR - James Ryther, William Plumpton v Matthew Redman, Richard Travers et al - STAC co York WR
- STAC 5/R11/27 - B A - 39 Eliz - - Antony Rowdon v Humfrey Cornwall, Richard Badham et al - STAC Rowdon
- STAC 5/R11/28 - B A - 37 Eliz - - William Rothwell v Nicholas Tonge, Richard Tonge, Reynold Wood et al - STAC Rothwell
- STAC 5/R11/29 - A - 37 Eliz - - Richard Rochester v William Rochester et al - STAC Rochester
- STAC 5/R11/30 - B A - 38 Eliz - - Marshal Rooper v Henry Full, John Deymon et al - STAC Roper
- STAC 5/R11/31 - C I D - 23 Eliz - - John Richards et uxor v William Pettie, John Horselie et al - STAC Richard
- STAC 5/R11/32 - B A - 15 Eliz - - Margaret Roll v Henry Roll, George Roll, Walter Westlake et al - STAC Rolle
- STAC 5/R11/33 - B A C I D - 34 Eliz - - Peter Roos v William Cardynall, John Anderson - STAC Roos
- STAC 5/R11/34 - B A - 37 Eliz - - Thomas Reading v Thomas Brace, John Weyld - STAC Reading
- STAC 5/R11/35 - B A Rn Rr - 8 Eliz - - William Randell v Thomas Smith, Edmund Helyar et al - STAC Randall
- STAC 5/R11/36 - Dr - 39 Eliz - Cornwall - John Raphe v Thomas Wyvell - STAC co Cornwall
- STAC 5/R11/37 - A - 40 Eliz - - Thomas Reresby v Ralph Critch, Henry Humlock - STAC Reresby
- STAC 5/R11/38 - B - 39 Eliz - Gloucestershire - Thomas Rookewood v Henry Permiter, Richard Wicksted et al - STAC co Gloucester
- STAC 5/R11/39 - B A Rn Rr - 24 Eliz - - Francis Raynsford v Hercules Raynsford et uxor, Margaret Raynsford et al - STAC Rainsford
- STAC 5/R11/40 - I D - 43 Eliz - Kent - Edward Rowle v Nicholas Morgan, John Reyve et al - STAC co Kent
‘R12 - Boxed STAC 5/R12/1-40 '
- STAC 5/R12/1 - B A Dr - 33 Eliz - - Robert Ramsden v Arthur Sothell alias Marshe, Thomas Marshall et al - STAC Ramsden
- STAC 5/R12/2 - B A - 20 Eliz - - Henry Rolle v Valentine Rolle et al - STAC Rolle
- STAC 5/R12/3 - C I D - 17 Eliz - Yorkshire NR - Richard Rogers v Richard Grenacres, John Foster et al - STAC co York NR
- STAC 5/R12/4 - I D - 15 Eliz - Norfolk - Richard Reeve v Thomas Grene - STAC co Norfolk
- STAC 5/R12/5 - B A - 36 Eliz - - Rees ap Robert v Rees ap Thomas, Thomas ap Williams et al - STAC Welsh names R
- STAC 5/R12/6 - I D - 24 Eliz - - William Rigdon v Robert Waringe, John Flower et al - STAC Rigdon
- STAC 5/R12/7 - D - 7 Eliz - Kent - Thomas Rolf v Inhabitants of Sandwich - STAC co Kent
- STAC 5/R12/8 - I D - 44 Eliz - London - Matthew Rutten, Abraham Rutten v Andrew Hill - STAC co London
- STAC 5/R12/9 - B A - 31 Eliz - Cornwall - John Raishley Sr v John Raishley Jr - STAC co Cornwall
- STAC 5/R12/10 - I D - 12 Eliz - Shropshire - Thomas Ridlye v Richard Geery, Richard Russell et al - STAC co Shropshire
- STAC 5/R12/11 - B A Rn C I D - 30 Eliz - - John Rumsey v Henry Mondaye, John Smith et al - STAC Romsey
- STAC 5/R12/12 - B A - 23 Eliz - - John Rodforde v Henry Ringwood, Charles Gose - STAC Rodford
- STAC 5/R12/13 - B - 36 Eliz - Caernarvon - Reynold Ruther v William ap Humfrey ap David, Humfrey David Loid et al - STAC co Caernarvon
- STAC 5/R12/14 - B A Rn - 30 Eliz - Carmarthen - Thomas ap Rice v John Morgan, Harry ap Griffith et al - STAC co Carmarthen
- STAC 5/R12/15 - I D - 30 Eliz - Lancashire - William Radcliffe v Richard Vaughan et uxor - STAC co Lancaster
- STAC 5/R12/16 - B A Rn Rr - 13 Eliz - - Thomas Rufford v William Higbed Sr, Thomas Higbed Jr, John Weste et al - STAC Rufford
- STAC 5/R12/17 - C I D - 40 Eliz - - John Rodes v Bryan Ellis - STAC Rodes
- STAC 5/R12/18 - I D - 44 Eliz - - Thomas Rude v Edmund Mervyn et al - STAC Rude
- STAC 5/R12/19 - I D - 35 Eliz - - Jenkin David Ricket et al v Hysone Bache, Rowland Rice et al - STAC Rickett
- STAC 5/R12/20 - B Dr - 32 Eliz - London - Owen Radcliffe v Christopher Meade - STAC co London
- STAC 5/R12/21 - I - 34 Eliz - - Huntlane Ratsey v Margaret Everlde, Thomas Smith et al - STAC Ratsey
- STAC 5/R12/22 - B - 25 Eliz - - Robert Russell v John Collyn, William Collyn, William Parker et al - STAC Russell
- STAC 5/R12/23 - I D - 1 Eliz - Middlesex - Christopher Rythe v Edward Boys et al - STAC co Middlesex
- STAC 5/R12/24 - B A - 7 Eliz - - John Rawleigh v John Yearde, Harry Yearde, Richard Gale et al - STAC Raleigh
- STAC 5/R12/25 - I D - 43 Eliz - Warwickshire - Richard Rylie v Ralph Sheldon et al - STAC co Warwick
- STAC 5/R12/26 - I D - 24 Eliz - - Geffere Rowlye v Andrew Beeche, James Rowlye - STAC Rowley
- STAC 5/R12/27 - B A Rn - 13 Eliz - - George Rolleston, Thomas Rowbotham, William Flint, Richard Flint, John Jackson v Thomas Reresbye, Nicholas Rowbotham, Robert Colley, John Spencer et al - STAC Rolleston
- STAC 5/R12/28 - B - 25 Eliz - - John Rogers v John Scudamore, John Jeffes Jr et al - STAC Rogers
- STAC 5/R12/29 - B - 24 Eliz - - John Roll v Thomas Strowde, John Jackson et al - STAC Rolle
- STAC 5/R12/30 - I D - 42 Eliz - Dorset - John Randall v William Waltham, John Small - STAC co Dorset
- STAC 5/R12/31 - I D - 39 Eliz - - George Richards v Thomas Philpott, Luke Phillpott, Lawrence Charlocke et al - STAC Richard
- STAC 5/R12/32 - A - 29 Eliz - - William Rice v Francis Duffield, Edward Newburye et al - STAC Rice
- STAC 5/R12/33 - I D - 19 Eliz - - William Reve v Robert Dodds, John Bond et al - STAC Reeve
- STAC 5/R12/34 - I D - 27 Eliz - Worcestershire - John Russell v Ralph Shelden - STAC co Worcester
- STAC 5/R12/35 - B A Rn - 41 Eliz - - Thomas Rea v Thomas Woodwarde, Thomas Drewe et al - STAC Rea
- STAC 5/R12/36 - D - 8 Eliz - - Francis Rogers v Walter Morgan, Thomas Vaughan et al - STAC Rogers
- STAC 5/R12/37 - B A C - 23 Eliz - - George Rosogan v William Beville, Peter Beville, John Balbery et al - STAC Rosogan
- STAC 5/R12/38 - B A C - 27 Eliz - - Richard Reynell v William Langverie, William Peter et al - STAC Reynell
- STAC 5/R12/39 - B - 23 Eliz - - John Raspole Jr v Edmund Coke, John Coke - STAC Raspole
- STAC 5/R12/40 - B A - 17 Eliz - - William Revett v Richard Snell, Ellen Snell, Thomas Rise et al - STAC Rivett
R13
- STAC 5/R13/1 - Rr - 28 Eliz - - Nicholas Reed v Walter Hele, Robert Crocker et al - STAC Read
- STAC 5/R13/2 - I D - 42 Eliz - - William Richardson v Edmund Harewell, Thomas Tuffley et al - STAC Richardson
- STAC 5/R13/3 - B A Rn Rr - 25 Eliz - - John Bishop of Rochester v Robert Shepherd Sr, Robert Munfeld et al - STAC Rochester
- STAC 5/R13/4 - I D - 23 Eliz - - Nicholas Raynes, Robert Thorpe v Arthur Topps et al - STAC Raynes
- STAC 5/R13/5 - B A Rn Rr C I D - 38 Eliz - - John Rushe v Thomas Russell - STAC Rush
- STAC 5/R13/6 - A Rn Rr - 20 Eliz - Sussex - John Rolfe v John Hebylthwaite, John Fagge et al - STAC co Sussex
- STAC 5/R13/7 - B A - 43 Eliz - - William Rawlins v John Gaynford, William Hawley et al - STAC Rawlins
- STAC 5/R13/8 - B A - 24 Eliz - - William Ramsey v Henry Anthony, John Gilbert et al - STAC Ramsay
- STAC 5/R13/9 - B Dr Rn - 26 Eliz - - Robert Raunce v Robert Paine, Edolph Dingley - STAC Raunce
- STAC 5/R13/10 - B - 28 Eliz - - William Rice v Francis Duffeld, Edward Newbery et al - STAC Rice
- STAC 5/R13/11 - B A - 38 Eliz - - Richard Ryley v Thomas Androse - STAC Riley
- STAC 5/R13/12 - B A C - 13 Eliz - - Morgan Rosse v William Herbert, William Morgan et al - STAC Rosse
- STAC 5/R13/13 - B A - 38 Eliz - - William Reynell v Walter Burges, Anthony Pyke et al - STAC Reynolds
- STAC 5/R13/14 - B A C - 28 Eliz - - James Rooe v John Dutton, Arnold Wirrall et al - STAC Rooe
- STAC 5/R13/15 - B A C - 10 Eliz - - Sir Thomas Ragland v George Keynston, William Bassett et al - STAC Ragland
- STAC 5/R13/16 - I D - 43 Eliz - Kent - Edward Rowle v Richard Morgan et al - STAC co Kent
- STAC 5/R13/17 - I D - 24 Eliz - - Robert Reynwill alias Reynolds, Robert Cary, Thomas Cary v Richard Bowden, Roger Alley et al - STAC Reynwill
- STAC 5/R13/18 - I D - 24 Eliz - - William Rydinge v John Byncke et al - STAC Riding
- STAC 5/R13/19 - Rr - 42 Eliz - - Thomas Rea v Thomas Woodward - STAC Rea
- STAC 5/R13/20 - B A Rn Rr - 9 Eliz - Cambridgeshire - Thomas Rombolde v Robert Preston, Robert Brandon et al - STAC co Cambridge
- STAC 5/R13/21 - I D - 41 Eliz - - Thomas Rayner, Edward Brittridge v William Nicholls, John Bentlie - STAC Rayner
- STAC 5/R13/22 - I D - 24 Eliz - - Thomas Restwicke v John Helgyn et al - STAC Restwick
- STAC 5/R13/23 - B - 37 Eliz - - John Richards v Philip John Rice, William Thomas et al - STAC Richard
- STAC 5/R13/24 - B - 37 Eliz - Cornwall - Thomas Rosewarne v William Pendervas, John Matthewe et al - STAC co Cornwall
- STAC 5/R13/25 - B A - 35 Eliz - - Thomas Rampston v William Rowe, Stephen Hamon et al - STAC Rampston
- STAC 5/R13/26 - B A C I D - 42 Eliz - - John Rodes v Godfrye Ashe, John Ashe et al - STAC Rodes
- STAC 5/R13/27 - B A C - 26 Eliz - - James Rooe v John Dutton, John Burton - STAC Rooe
- STAC 5/R13/28 - I D - 35 Eliz - - Robert Rowe v Thomas Philips - STAC Rowe
- STAC 5/R13/29 - I D - 24 Eliz - - Godfrey Robberds, Ralph Robberds, John Judy - STAC Roberts
- STAC 5/R13/30 - Rr I D - 42 Eliz - - John Rodes v Francis Gregory, Robert Gregory et al - STAC Rodes
- STAC 5/R13/31 - I D - 25 Eliz - - Sir John Radcliffe v Gilbert Sherington, Ralph Worseley et al - STAC Radcliffe
- STAC 5/R13/32 - I D - 24 Eliz - - Roger Revell v John Wilson, John Watts et al - STAC Revell
- STAC 5/R13/33 - I D - 24 Eliz - - William Rydinge v Robert Rowberds - STAC Riding
- STAC 5/R13/34 - I D - 44 Eliz - Somerset - John Rogers v William Gullye et al - STAC co Somerset
- STAC 5/R13/35 - B - 29 Eliz - - Stephen Rogers v Elizabeth Porter alias Coxe, Philip Goodwyn et al - STAC Rogers
- STAC 5/R13/36 - I D - 41 Eliz - - Richard Reason v Humfrey Gunson - STAC Reason
- STAC 5/R13/37 - I D - 24 Eliz - - David John Rawe, William Davy alias Pendervas v Hugh Jones - STAC Rowe
- STAC 5/R13/38 - I D - 24 Eliz - - William Roa v Humfry Lowe, George Hipkis - STAC Roa
- STAC 5/R13/39 - I D - 35 Eliz - - Francis Rowland v Thomas Gough - STAC Rowland
- STAC 5/R13/40 - D - 38 Eliz - - Robert Readhead v John Banister - STAC Redhead
R14
- STAC 5/R14/1 - B - 37 Eliz - - Bennett Rosewarne v John Maddrey, Robert Coade et al - STAC Rosewarne
- STAC 5/R14/2 - B - 17 Eliz - - Thomas Richardson v John Carter et uxor - STAC Richardson
- STAC 5/R14/3 - I D - 36 Eliz - - Peter Randall v John Capelyn, Thomas Sewell - STAC Randall
- STAC 5/R14/4 - B A C I D - 34 Eliz - Cheshire - James Roo v John Wilkinson, Adam Shawe et al - STAC co Chester
- STAC 5/R14/5 - B A Rn I D - 26 Eliz - - Henry Rolle v Joachim Rolle, George Rolle et al - STAC Rolle
- STAC 5/R14/6 - Rr - 40 Eliz - - Nicholas Rolls v Bryan Newton, William Whitlacke - STAC Rolle
- STAC 5/R14/7 - I D - 39 Eliz - - William Randall, Philip Robinson v William Warner et al - STAC Randall
- STAC 5/R14/8 - B A Dr - 29 Eliz - - Roger Robotham v John Eston, Thomas Snagge et al - STAC Robotham
- STAC 5/R14/9 - I D - 38 Eliz - - William Rigdon v John Flower - STAC Rigdon
- STAC 5/R14/10 - I D - 38 Eliz - - Walter Rumsey v Thomas John David - STAC Rumsey
- STAC 5/R14/11 - Rr - 40 Eliz - - George Richards v Lawrence Charlook, Timothy Philpott et al - STAC Richard
- STAC 5/R14/12 - Rn - 40 Eliz - - William Robins v Bartholomew Sampford et al - STAC Robins
- STAC 5/R14/13 - Rr - 37 Eliz - - Walter Rumsey v Andrew Powell et al - STAC Rumsey
- STAC 5/R14/14 - Rn - 37 Eliz - - Stephen Rogers v Maurice Berklye et al - STAC Rogers
- STAC 5/R14/15 - B A C I D - 22 Eliz - - Simon Reynor v John Gabytus, Robert Styll - STAC Rayner
- STAC 5/R14/16 - B A Rn Rr - 3 Eliz - - Andrew Rede v Thomas Meade, John Turpin et al - STAC Read
- STAC 5/R14/17 - B Dr - 23 Eliz - - James Rither v Antony Mawde - STAC Rither
- STAC 5/R14/18 - Rn - 37 Eliz - - Robert Rovers v Northe Harrison - STAC Rovers
- STAC 5/R14/19 - B - 34 Eliz - - John Raunce v William Mundaye - STAC Raunce
- STAC 5/R14/20 - B A Rn Rr - 16 Eliz - Yorkshire NR - Richard Rogers v Richard Greenacres, John Foster et al - STAC co York NR
- STAC 5/R14/21 - B A C I D - 35 Eliz - - John Rodes v Francis Rodes, Richard Draper et al - STAC Rodes
- STAC 5/R14/22 - B - 28 Eliz - - Richard Rathebond v Godfrey Clarke, Thomas Clarke - STAC Rathbond
- STAC 5/R14/23 - I D - 25 Eliz - - Henry Rodde v John Taylour et al - STAC Rodd
- STAC 5/R14/24 - I D - 38 Eliz - Shropshire - Blanche Redge, Thomas Corbett v Robert Redge - STAC co Shropshire
- STAC 5/R14/25 - B A - 33 Eliz - Cambridgeshire - Owen Radcliffe v Christopher Meade, Adam Tabram et al - STAC co Cambridge
- STAC 5/R14/26 - B - 36 Eliz - - Peter Rodes v Marmadule Kendall, Henry Kendall et al - STAC Rodes
- STAC 5/R14/27 - B - 17 Eliz - - John Ryves v Thomas Sidenham, Henry Sidenham et al - STAC Rives
- STAC 5/R14/28 - B A Rn Rr - 16 Eliz - - Robert Recorde v Griffith Barrett, James Howell et al - STAC Record
- STAC 5/R14/29 - A - 38 Eliz - - William Rochester v Richard Rochester, Josias Kirton et al - STAC Rochester
- STAC 5/R14/30 - B A Rr - 37 Eliz - - George Rider v Michael Cobb, Robert Jacob et al - STAC Rider
- STAC 5/R14/31 - B A C I D - 43 Eliz - - William Rawson v Sir George Farmor, Francis Morgan et al - STAC Rawson
- STAC 5/R14/32 - Rr - 39 Eliz - - John Rodes et al v Humfrey Pype, Richard Denham et al - STAC Rodes
- STAC 5/R14/33 - D - 43 Eliz - - Richard Ryley v Lionel French, Thomas Robbins et al - STAC Riley
- STAC 5/R14/34 - B - 19 Eliz - Denbigh - Thomas ap Roger v Davie ap Hugh, Henry Davie et al - STAC co Denbigh
- STAC 5/R14/35 - I D - 38 Eliz - - John Rodes et al v Edward Wilson, John Wright - STAC Rodes
- STAC 5/R14/36 - C I D - 42 Eliz - - Anne Rowley v Edward Pratt alias Bratt, William Millingham et al - STAC Rowley
- STAC 5/R14/37 - I - 36 Eliz - Somerset - Philip Radybone v John Chicke, Edmund Hoddy - STAC co Somerset
- STAC 5/R14/38 - B - 25 Eliz - - Dyonise Rawden, John Kyllingebeck v John Nunes, Robert Crowe et al - STAC Rawden
- STAC 5/R14/39 - B A - 29 Eliz - - William Roche v John Vivian, Christopher Nevis - STAC Roche
- STAC 5/R14/40 - I D - 44 Eliz - - Robert Robinson v John Kiblewhite, William Essex et al - STAC Robinson
R15
- STAC 5/R15/1 - I D - 39 Eliz - London - William Read v John Markham Sr, John Markham Jr, Roger Booth et al - STAC co London
- STAC 5/R15/2 - C I D - 5 Eliz - Wiltshire - Henry, Earl of Rutland v William Darrell, Roger Foen et al - STAC co Wiltshire
- STAC 5/R15/3 - B - 43 Eliz - - John Rudstone v William Browne, Richard Browne et al - STAC Rudstone
- STAC 5/R15/4 - C I D - 37 Eliz - - Thomas Rosseter v Bartholomew Garwell, John Garwell et al - STAC Rossiter
- STAC 5/R15/5 - Rr - 35 Eliz - - Thomas Rudgeway v William Ley - STAC Rudgeway
- STAC 5/R15/6 - I D - 34 Eliz - - Nicholas Raynton v Paul Tracie, William Huntlie et al - STAC Raynton
- STAC 5/R15/7 - I D - 44 Eliz - - Thomas Reade v John Pescod, John Hersey et al - STAC Read
- STAC 5/R15/8 - B A I D - 33 Eliz - - Giles Rainsford v Thomas Westcott et al - STAC Rainsford
- STAC 5/R15/9 - Rr - 37 Eliz - - John Rogers v Thomas Staunton, Jane Walforde - STAC Rogers
- STAC 5/R15/10 - Rr - 35 Eliz - - Richard Rither, Henry Lane v William Gardener, Henry Draper et al - STAC Rither
- STAC 5/R15/11 - Rr - 35 Eliz - Hampshire - Henry Ringewood v John Bulkeley, Thomas Charnell - STAC co Hampshire
- STAC 5/R15/12 - I D - 23 Eliz - - John Rosell v Henry Parr - STAC Russell
- STAC 5/R15/13 - C I D - 32 Eliz - - Thomas Radcliffe v John Watson et al - STAC Radcliffe
- STAC 5/R15/14 - B A - 36 Eliz - - George Ruggells v Edward Body, Thomas Cawson et al - STAC Ruggell
- STAC 5/R15/15 - B A Rn C I D - 23 Eliz - - Henry Rodd v John Taylor, Robert Clench et al - STAC Rodd
- STAC 5/R15/16 - B A - 36 Eliz - - Francis Rowland Jr v Thomas Gough, Hugh Mores et al - STAC Rowland
- STAC 5/R15/17 - B A - 36 Eliz - - Nicholas Remart v Robert Boughier, Richard Tanvile - STAC Remart
- STAC 5/R15/18 - B I D - 29 Eliz - - Nicholas Raynton v Paul Tracey, John Fryer et al - STAC Raynton
- STAC 5/R15/19 - B A - 24 Eliz - - Richard Reynell, Robert Carye, Thomas Carye v Roger Alley, Richard Bowden et al - STAC Reynell
- STAC 5/R15/20 - B A C - 24 Eliz - - William Roa v William Wight, John Wight et al - STAC Roa
- STAC 5/R15/21 - I D - 33 Eliz - - John Renman v John Wanyon - STAC Remnam
- STAC 5/R15/22 - I D - 33 Eliz - - James Rayment v John Lambert et al - STAC Rayment
- STAC 5/R15/23 - I D - 25 Eliz - - Hercules Ransforde v John Hollyocke - STAC Rainsford
- STAC 5/R15/24 - I D - 35 Eliz - - Edmond Reynolds v William Searche - STAC Reynolds
- STAC 5/R15/25 - B A - 31 Eliz - - Robert Rithe v John North Sr, John North Jr, Daniel Payne et al - STAC Rithe
- STAC 5/R15/26 - B A - 29 Eliz - - John Ryton v William Jones, William Groves et al - STAC Ryton
- STAC 5/R15/27 - B A - 19 Eliz - - Thomas Risedon v Thomas Harvye - STAC Risedon
- STAC 5/R15/28 - B Rn I D - 36 Eliz - - Thomas Rosseter v Bartholomew Garwell, John Garwell et al - STAC Rossiter
- STAC 5/R15/29 - B A C - 1 Eliz - - Thomas Reignold v John Nicholas, John Pellyone et al - STAC Reynolds
- STAC 5/R15/30 - I D - 33 Eliz - London - Henry Robinson v Thomas Blighton et al - STAC co London
- STAC 5/R15/31 - B A - 38 Eliz - Berkshire - Lady Elizabeth Russell v Richard Lovelace, Robert Mathew et al. Report - STAC 5/R15/31r - STAC co Berkshire
- STAC 5/R15/32 - B - 18 Eliz - Caernarvon - William ap Rytherch v Rowland Wyne ap David ap Williams et al - STAC co Caernarvon
- STAC 5/R15/33 - B A - 38 Eliz - - Jevan ap Robert v, John Williams, Robert Prideaux et al - STAC Welsh names R
- STAC 5/R15/34 - B A - 19 Eliz - - Elizabeth Ryclethorne v Philip Cockerham et uxor, John Elyott et al - STAC Ricklethorn
- STAC 5/R15/35 - I D - 38 Eliz - - William Reynolds v Walter Burges, Anthony Peeke - STAC Reynolds
- STAC 5/R15/36 - B A - 44 Eliz - - William Robson et uxor v Thomas Bowne, Zachary Humfrey et al - STAC Robson
- STAC 5/R15/37 - B A Rn - 35 Eliz - - John Rudgeway v Bowyer Worsley, Richard Worsley et al - STAC Rudgeway
- STAC 5/R15/38 - B A C I D - 30 Eliz - - Stephen Rogers v Elizabeth Porter alias Cope, Philip Goodwin et al - STAC Rogers
- STAC 5/R15/39 - I D - 13 Eliz - - John Rycall v John Newarke, Robert Noddall et al - STAC Richall
- STAC 5/R15/40 - I D - 19 Eliz - - Sir John Ryvers v Thomas Willoughby, Edward Cranwell et al - STAC Rivers
