Difference between revisions of "STAC Kighley"
From Waalt
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | ''' B ''' Bill of Complaint ''' Dr ''' Demurrer ''' A ''' Answer ''' Rn ''' Replication ''' Rr ''' Rejoinder | ||
| + | ''' C ''' Commission ''' I ''' Interrogatories ''' D ''' Deposition | ||
| + | <BR> <BR> | ||
| + | |||
''' Kighley, Ann ''' | ''' Kighley, Ann ''' | ||
| − | *STAC 5/K14/21 - B - - Ann Kighley v Robert Worseley, William Charnock | + | *STAC 5/K14/21 - B - 23 Eliz - Yorkshire - Ann Kighley v Robert Worseley, William Charnock |
| − | *STAC 5/K9/26 - B - 23 Eliz - Ann Kighley v Robert Worseley, Robert Charnocke, William Charnocke, Sir Edmund Traifford | + | *STAC 5/K9/26 - B - 23 Eliz - Yorkshire - Ann Kighley v Robert Worseley, Robert Charnocke, William Charnocke, Sir Edmund Traifford |
| + | **see [[STAC co York]] | ||
''' Kigheley, Edmund ''' | ''' Kigheley, Edmund ''' | ||
| − | *STAC 5/K10/5 - B - 27 Eliz - Edmund Kigheley v Richard Goldesborough, John Bikerdike | + | *STAC 5/K10/5 - B - 27 Eliz - Yorkshire - Edmund Kigheley v Richard Goldesborough, John Bikerdike |
| − | *STAC 5/K5/5 - B A - 29 Eliz - Edmond Kyghley et uxor, Reynold Jake v Richard Goldsborough, Francis Baildon et al | + | *STAC 5/K5/5 - B A - 29 Eliz - Yorkshire - Edmond Kyghley et uxor, Reynold Jake v Richard Goldsborough, Francis Baildon et al |
| + | **see [[STAC co York]] | ||
''' Kyghley, Philip ''' | ''' Kyghley, Philip ''' | ||
| − | *STAC 5/K5/15 - B A Rn I D - 39 Eliz - Philip Kyghley v William Sheldon et al | + | *STAC 5/K5/15 - B A Rn I D - 39 Eliz - - Philip Kyghley v William Sheldon et al |
| − | *STAC 5/K14/23 - B A - 43 Eliz - Philip Kightley v Humfry Bridge, William Mawnder et al | + | |
| − | *STAC 5/K11/40 - Rn I D - 43 Eliz - Philip Keighley v Humfrey Bridge, Thomas Bushell, Henry Parkins, John Parkins et al | + | ''' Kighley, Philip ''' |
| + | *STAC 5/K14/23 - B A - 43 Eliz - - Philip Kightley v Humfry Bridge, William Mawnder et al | ||
| + | *STAC 5/K11/40 - Rn I D - 43 Eliz - - Philip Keighley v Humfrey Bridge, Thomas Bushell, Henry Parkins, John Parkins et al | ||
''' Kighley, Thomas ''' | ''' Kighley, Thomas ''' | ||
| − | *STAC 5/K9/22 - B - 23 Eliz - Thomas Kighley v Sylvester Sponer, Robert Goodaye, Robert Hunt, Richard Noble et al | + | *STAC 5/K9/22 - B - 23 Eliz - - Thomas Kighley v Sylvester Sponer, Robert Goodaye, Robert Hunt, Richard Noble et al |
| − | '''Notes, Additions and Corrections | + | '''Notes, Additions and Corrections''' |
| + | *see also Bartholomew Kytley alias Kighley | ||
Latest revision as of 20:54, 16 April 2023
B Bill of Complaint Dr Demurrer A Answer Rn Replication Rr Rejoinder
C Commission I Interrogatories D Deposition
Kighley, Ann
- STAC 5/K14/21 - B - 23 Eliz - Yorkshire - Ann Kighley v Robert Worseley, William Charnock
- STAC 5/K9/26 - B - 23 Eliz - Yorkshire - Ann Kighley v Robert Worseley, Robert Charnocke, William Charnocke, Sir Edmund Traifford
- see STAC co York
Kigheley, Edmund
- STAC 5/K10/5 - B - 27 Eliz - Yorkshire - Edmund Kigheley v Richard Goldesborough, John Bikerdike
- STAC 5/K5/5 - B A - 29 Eliz - Yorkshire - Edmond Kyghley et uxor, Reynold Jake v Richard Goldsborough, Francis Baildon et al
- see STAC co York
Kyghley, Philip
- STAC 5/K5/15 - B A Rn I D - 39 Eliz - - Philip Kyghley v William Sheldon et al
Kighley, Philip
- STAC 5/K14/23 - B A - 43 Eliz - - Philip Kightley v Humfry Bridge, William Mawnder et al
- STAC 5/K11/40 - Rn I D - 43 Eliz - - Philip Keighley v Humfrey Bridge, Thomas Bushell, Henry Parkins, John Parkins et al
Kighley, Thomas
- STAC 5/K9/22 - B - 23 Eliz - - Thomas Kighley v Sylvester Sponer, Robert Goodaye, Robert Hunt, Richard Noble et al
Notes, Additions and Corrections
- see also Bartholomew Kytley alias Kighley
