Difference between revisions of "TemplateforRexRolls"

From Waalt
(→‎T)
Line 112: Line 112:
 
|-
 
|-
  
−
! <B>Rex by John de Norton v. William de Bellesoure, William Dolfyn </B>  
+
! <B>Rex v. </B>  
−
| Derbyshire
+
|  
 
|  (Indict); (Enrol)
 
|  (Indict); (Enrol)
 
|  
 
|  
−
| contempt and trespass
 
 
|  
 
|  
−
| Main: ; Other: KB27/227, m 101 d (capias, quindene of Easter) [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/E2/KB27no227/aKB27no227fronts/IMG_0195.htm]
+
|
 +
| Main: ; Other:  
 
|-
 
|-
  
−
 
+
! <B>Rex v. </B>  
−
 
+
|  
−
! <B>Rex v. Beverley, Chapter of St John of Beverley</B>  
 
−
| Yorks
 
 
|  (Indict); (Enrol)
 
|  (Indict); (Enrol)
 
|  
 
|  
−
| Quod permittat, presentation to a prebend in church of St Mary of Beverley
 
 
|  
 
|  
−
| Main: ; Other: KB27/227, m 101 f (Chapter to be attached, quindene of Easter) [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/E2/KB27no227/aKB27no227fronts/IMG_0212.htm]
+
|
 +
| Main: ; Other:  
 
|-
 
|-
  
 +
 +
!
  
  
Line 156: Line 156:
  
  
−
! <B>Rex v. Nicholas de Camelton, vicar of the church of Clophill (Caupol) </B>  
+
! <B>Rex v. </B>  
−
| Beds.
+
|  
 
|  (Indict); (Enrol)
 
|  (Indict); (Enrol)
 
|  
 
|  
−
| William Jerveys accused Nicholas de Camelton, vicar of Clophill, of having raped and abducted Felicia, his wife; the accuser fails to appear. The defendant is acquitted of the king's suit.
 
 
|  
 
|  
−
| Main: ; Other: KB27/227, m 101 f[http://aalt.law.uh.edu/E2/KB27no227/aKB27no227fronts/IMG_0212.htm]
+
|
 +
| Main: ; Other:  
 
|-
 
|-
  
  
−
! <B>Rex v. Simon Curtey, Henry Alard, Robert de Cralle, Willelmus Aleman, Richard son of William de Eldechurch, William Jandelot, Thomas son of Julian de Hauekeham, John Willard de la Doune, Nicholas Wygge de Hauekeham, John Moleyn Gervase de Foulrich, Simon Glower, Thomas Pye, Martin Greon, Walter Crop, Simon atte Merssh, William Prig, Hugh Lower, John Sendrowe, James Hus de Asshementon, Bergarius de Northeton, Giles atte Stile, Richard de Stoke </B>  
+
! <B>Rex v. </B>  
−
| Sussex
+
|  
 
|  (Indict); (Enrol)
 
|  (Indict); (Enrol)
 
|  
 
|  
−
| The defendants were outlawed in the Trinity Term 1316 for trespass against the prior of Michelham and Thomas de Augemere, his canon
 
 
|  
 
|  
−
| Main: ; Other: KB27/227, m 101 d (capias sicut prius, the sheriff to have the bodies on the morrow of St John the Baptist, 25 June 1317) [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/E2/KB27no227/aKB27no227fronts/IMG_0194.htm]
+
|
 +
| Main: ; Other:  
 
|-
 
|-
  
Line 199: Line 199:
  
  
−
! <B>Rex by John de Norton v. Ranulph Dacre </B>  
+
! <B>Rex v. </B>  
−
| Warwickshire
+
|  
 
|  (Indict); (Enrol)
 
|  (Indict); (Enrol)
 
|  
 
|  
−
| A jury to determine wether the defendant is guilty of the rape and abduction of Margaret, daughter and heiress of Thomas de Multon de Gillesaunde, who died in Warwick Castle. The defendant was aided by Richard de Knolle and others
 
 
|  
 
|  
−
| Main: ; Other: KB27/227, m 102 (default of the jury; the sheriff to have the jury; capias concerning Richard de Knolle) [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/E2/KB27no227/aKB27no227fronts/IMG_0215.htm]
+
|
 +
| Main: ; Other:  
 
|-
 
|-
  
  
−
! <B>*Rex v. Hugh de Dalby, parson of the church of Swenston, William Deyuill, Henry Godyng de Stratford </B>  
+
! <B>Rex v. </B>  
−
| Buckinghamshire
+
|  
 
|  (Indict); (Enrol)
 
|  (Indict); (Enrol)
 
|  
 
|  
−
| They were convicted in the King's Bench of trespass against Thomas de Pyghtesle, parson of the moiety of the church of Walton and Ralph Hartele, parson of the other moiety of this church
 
 
|  
 
|  
−
| Main: ; Other: KB27/227, m 103 (they are to be outlawed if they do not surrender themselves to gaol and the sheriff is to have them on 25 June 1317) [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/E2/KB27no227/aKB27no227fronts/IMG_0216.htm]
+
|
 +
| Main: ; Other:  
 
|-
 
|-
  
  
−
! <B>Rex v. Robert Darre </B>  
+
! <B>Rex v. </B>  
−
| London
+
|
 
| (Indict); (Enrol)
 
| (Indict); (Enrol)
−
| Sheriffs' Court London
 
−
| Killing of Harvey de Playford in parish of St Augustine, Farringdon Ward, London
 
 
|  
 
|  
−
| Main: ; Other: KB27/227, m 100 f (capias sicut pluries, quindene of Easter)[http://aalt.law.uh.edu/E2/KB27no227/aKB27no227fronts/IMG_0210.htm]
+
|
 +
|
 +
| Main: ; Other:  
 
|-
 
|-
  
  
−
! <B>*Rex v. Thomas de Derteford, chaplain, William in the Lane </B>  
+
! <B>Rex v. </B>  
−
| Essex
+
|  
 
|  (Indict); (Enrol)
 
|  (Indict); (Enrol)
 
|  
 
|  
−
| to be arrested for beating and wounding William de Neuport; Thomas de Derteford was arrested and died in prison
 
 
|  
 
|  
−
| Main: ; Other: KB27/227, m 102 (the sheriff toprovide information on the chattels of Thomas de Derteford by the quindene of Easter) [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/E2/KB27no227/aKB27no227fronts/IMG_0214.htm]
+
|
 +
| Main: ; Other:  
 
|-
 
|-
  
  
−
! <B>Rex by John de Norton v. John de Doddingseles </B>  
+
! <B>Rex v. </B>  
−
| Oxon
+
|  
 
|  (Indict); (Enrol)
 
|  (Indict); (Enrol)
 
|  
 
|  
−
| quod permittat concerning a new parson of the church of Bradewelle (Broadwell); John de Doddingseles was attached by John le Mymp, Ralph Peyteuyn
 
 
|  
 
|  
−
| Main: ; Other: KB27/227, m 103 (the sheriff to have his body before the king in the quindene of Easter) [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/E2/KB27no227/aKB27no227fronts/IMG_0216.htm]
+
|
 +
| Main: ; Other:  
 
|-
 
|-
  
Line 335: Line 335:
  
  
−
! <B>Rex by John de Norton v. Robert le Harpour de Framlingham </B>  
+
! <B>Rex v. </B>  
−
| Suffolk
+
|  
 
|  (Indict); (Enrol)
 
|  (Indict); (Enrol)
 
|  
 
|  
−
| contempt and trespass; the defendant is mainprised by John de Watlyng, Adam Feryng, Stephen Feryng, Geoffreyde Watlyng
 
 
|  
 
|  
−
| Main: ; Other: KB27/227, m 101 f (sheriff to have the body in the quindene of Easter) [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/E2/KB27no227/aKB27no227fronts/IMG_0213.htm]
+
|
 +
| Main: ; Other:  
 
|-
 
|-
  
  
−
! <B>Rex v. Robert del Hegge </B>
 
−
| Suffolk
 
−
|  (Indict); (Enrol)
 
−
| King's Bench
 
−
| trespass against Nicholas le Bonde
 
−
| was convicted of trespass and failed to redeem himself
 
−
| Main: ; Other: KB27/227, m 101 f (sheriff to have the body on the morrow of St John the Baptist, 25 June 1317)[http://aalt.law.uh.edu/E2/KB27no227/aKB27no227fronts/IMG_0213.htm]
 
−
|-
 
  
−
! <B>*Rex v. Osbert le Herde de Sondon </B>
 
−
| Essex
 
−
|  (Indict); (Enrol)
 
−
|
 
−
| He was convicted of a trespass against Richard de Sutton
 
−
|
 
−
| Main: ; Other: KB27/227, m 102 (The sheriff to begin proceedings of outlawry. Capias to have him on 25 June 1317 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/E2/KB27no227/aKB27no227fronts/IMG_0214.htm]
 
−
|-
 
−
 
−
 
−
! <B>Rex v. Robert Homas </B>
 
−
| Kent
 
−
|  (Indict); (Enrol)
 
−
|
 
−
| trespass against John son of Eustace de Bourne
 
−
|
 
−
| Main: ; Other: KB27/227, m 101 d (following the outlawry of the accused in the county court the sheriff and coroners are instructed to have the accused in court in the quindene of Easter) ([http://aalt.law.uh.edu/E2/KB27no227/aKB27no227fronts/IMG_0195.htm]
 
−
|-
 
  
  
Line 458: Line 432:
  
  
−
! <B>Rex by John de Norton v. Henry le Lord de Neuton </B>  
+
! <B>Rex v. </B>  
−
| Warwickshire
+
|  
 
|  (Indict); (Enrol)
 
|  (Indict); (Enrol)
 
|  
 
|  
−
| Death of Richard son of Ralph Coleyn de Neuton; Henry le Lord was appealed by Avice who was Richard's wife but she failed to prosecute
 
 
|  
 
|  
−
| Main: ; Other: KB27/227, m 101 f (the jury failed to appear; a jury to be summoned by the quindene of Easter)[http://aalt.law.uh.edu/E2/KB27no227/aKB27no227fronts/IMG_0212.htm]
+
|
 +
| Main: ; Other:  
 
|-
 
|-
  
  
−
! <B>Rex v. Bartholomew Lomens de Newenton (West Newton?), John de Norff' clerk, Roger le Cotiller </B>  
+
! <B>Rex v. </B>  
−
| Rutland
+
|  
 
|  (Indict); (Enrol)
 
|  (Indict); (Enrol)
−
| King's Court
+
|  
−
| Trespass against Philip de Gynewelle
+
|  
−
| They were convicted of the trespass in the king's court in the reign of Edward I and failed to redeem themselves so that they were outlawed on 30 September 1305
+
|  
−
| Main: ; Other: KB27/227, m 101 f (royal command sicut pluries to sheriff and coroners to  have a jury establish information on their property for the quindene of Easter [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/E2/KB27no227/aKB27no227fronts/IMG_0212.htm]
+
| Main: ; Other:  
 
|-
 
|-
 +
  
  
Line 543: Line 518:
  
  
−
! <B>Rex by John de Norton v. Robert Ofthese John de Cotes, Hugh Mode, John Ofthese, William de Cotes, Thomas le Taverner de Rameseye,, Robert de Clotrum, William Desby, Walter de Cantewe, John Wyt, Gilbert Trewe, Richard Trunk, William Paynleue John Traste, John le Freresmesh, Gilbert Trewe </B>  
+
! <B>Rex v.  </B>  
−
| Suffolk
+
|  
 
|  (Indict); (Enrol)
 
|  (Indict); (Enrol)
 
|  
 
|  
−
| contempt and trespass
 
 
|  
 
|  
−
| Main: ; Other: KB27/227, m 101 d (capias, quindene of Easter)[http://aalt.law.uh.edu/E2/KB27no227/aKB27no227fronts/IMG_0194.htm]
+
|
 +
| Main: ; Other:  
 
|-
 
|-
  
Line 574: Line 549:
 
|-
 
|-
  
−
! <B>Rex by John de Norton v. John de Pelham, Walter de Mersshton, Philip de Mershton, Robert atte Halle, Robert son of Richard, John Est, Henry le Foulere, Peter de Potenham, Walter Cubelcote, Henry atte Halle, Ralph de Halstowe, John atte Ponde, John le Forester, Thomas atte Maudeleyne, Geoffrey de Cokeregge, Nichlas de Pandele, John de Hamele, Robert atte Hyde, Richard de Halstouwe, David Hornel, John Holebein Thomas le Daye, John de Thorneye, John atte Southende </B>  
+
! <B>Rex v. </B>  
−
| Herts
+
|  
 
|  (Indict); (Enrol)
 
|  (Indict); (Enrol)
 
|  
 
|  
−
| Refusal to attend the sheriff's tourn at Tring (Trenge) which they are obliged to attend twice per annum; the sheriff returns that they were mainprised by Philip of Mershton and Robert atte Walle, Robert Est and Henry Gerveys, Robert son of Richard and John son of Peter, John ate Grene and William Louekyn, Walter of Mershton and Robert atte Halle, Robert son of Richard and John de Pelham, John Est and Walter Prat, William Jordon and Henry Louely, Thomas Gery and William Bigge, Peter de Pucham and Walter de Cobelcote, William Toky and Walter Apelard, John Delyuere and Jordan Alby, Walter Gery and Hamo de Wyleby, William Miles and John atte Ponde, John le Forester and John atte Ponde, Thomas atte Maudeleyne and Geoffrey de Cokerigge, Henry atte Halle and Ralph de Halstowe, Nicholas de Pendele and John de Hamele, Robert atte Hyde and John de Hamele, John Hobelyn and Thomas Daye, David Hornel and Thomas Daye, John Hobelyn and David Hornel, Robert atte Welle and Thomas Daye, Walter Cobelcote and Peter de Pontenham.
 
 
|  
 
|  
−
| Main: ; Other: KB27/227, m 100 f (the sheriff to distrain the accused and to have them in the quindene of Easter [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/E2/KB27no227/aKB27no227fronts/IMG_0211.htm]
+
|
 +
| Main: ; Other:  
 
|-
 
|-
  
  
−
! <B>Rex by John de Norton v. Robert son of John Penreth; John brother of Robert Penreth; John son of William of Blencowe; Adam Basket </B>  
+
 
−
| Cumberland
+
! <B>Rex v. </B>  
−
| (Indict); (Enrol)
 
 
|  
 
|  
−
| taking two of the king's falcons in the custody ofJohn Prestman in Laysingby
+
| (Indict); (Enrol)
 
|  
 
|  
−
| Main: ; Other: KB27/227, m 100 f (capias sicut pluries, quindene of Easter) [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/E2/KB27no227/aKB27no227fronts/IMG_0210.htm]
 
−
|-
 
−
 
−
 
−
! <B>*Rex v. Christian who was the wife of John le Porter de Dunham </B>
 
−
|
 
−
|  (Indict); (Enrol)
 
 
|  
 
|  
−
| She failed to prosecute her appeal agaiinst William le Warde, Robertofthebury, William le Porter, Roger Smer.., John Hasard concerning the death of John of Porter, formerly her husband
 
 
|  
 
|  
−
| Main: ; Other: KB27/227, m 102 (capias for the quindene of Easter 1317) [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/E2/KB27no227/aKB27no227fronts/IMG_0215.htm]
+
| Main: ; Other:  
 
|-
 
|-
  
Line 667: Line 633:
  
  
−
! <B>Rex by John de Norton v. Prior of Sherborne </B>  
+
! <B>Rex v. </B>  
−
| Hampshire
+
|  
 
|  (Indict); (Enrol)
 
|  (Indict); (Enrol)
 
|  
 
|  
−
| breach of the king's peace; assault on royal purveyors
 
 
|  
 
|  
−
| Main: ; Other: KB27/227, m 101 d (capias, to have the prior in prison by the quindene of Easter) [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/E2/KB27no227/aKB27no227fronts/IMG_0194.htm]
+
|
 +
| Main: ; Other:  
 
|-
 
|-
  
  
−
! <B>*Rex v. Simon le Skynnere, Ralph le Bowestrengere, William Bouer </B>  
+
!! <B>Rex v. </B>  
−
| Essex
+
|  
 
|  (Indict); (Enrol)
 
|  (Indict); (Enrol)
 
|  
 
|  
−
| They were convicted of trespass against Agnes Skerewhyt
 
 
|  
 
|  
−
| Main: ; Other: KB27/227, m 102 (They are to be outlawed; capias to have them in the King's Bench on 25 June 1317) [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/E2/KB27no227/aKB27no227fronts/IMG_0214.htm]
+
|
 +
| Main: ; Other:  
 
|-
 
|-
  
−
 
+
! <B>Rex v. </B>  
−
! <B>*Rex v. magister John Stacy de Chepingnorton </B>  
+
|  
−
| Oxon
 
 
|  (Indict); (Enrol)
 
|  (Indict); (Enrol)
 
|  
 
|  
−
| trespass committed against Robert son of Alan de Gunwardeby of which he was convicted in the king's court
 
 
|  
 
|  
−
| Main: ; Other: KB27/227, m 102 (sheriff to have his body on 25 June 1317 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/E2/KB27no227/aKB27no227fronts/IMG_0214.htm]
 
−
|-
 
−
 
−
 
−
! <B>Rex by John de Norton v. Henry de Stapelho of Ely </B>
 
−
| Cambridgeshire
 
−
|  (Indict); (Enrol)
 
 
|  
 
|  
−
| accusation of contempt and trespass; sheriff returns that Henry has been mainprised by Richard Prik and John dee Multon, John de Weston and Walter Motoun
+
| Main: ; Other:  
−
|
 
−
| Main: ; Other: KB27/227, m 101 f (sheriff to distrain him sicut pluries; habeat corpus in quindene of Easter [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/E2/KB27no227/aKB27no227fronts/IMG_0212.htm]
 
 
|-
 
|-
  
  
−
! <B>Rex v. Alexander de Stoke </B>
 
−
| Cambridgeshire
 
−
|  (Indict) before Oyer and Terminer justices in Cambridgeshire on 18 November 1314 by jury consisting of: Thomas Austred, John de Gynes, William Bronnyng, Roger de Abiton, Nicholas de Sancto Clavo, William son of Ralph, Eustace de Bresy, Richard de Clopton, William de Gatele, Peter Pycot, Hugh le Rous, Thomas de Ellesworth; (Enrol)
 
−
| Oyer and Terminer
 
−
| felony - robbery of William Wulli in Chesterton nr. Cambridge
 
−
| Certiorari to King's Bench dated 2 July 1316, concerning the outlawry pronounced in the county court of Cambridge; certiorary to the justices of oyer and terminer who send the record including the process of outlawry in the county court
 
−
| Main: ; Other: KB27/227, m 100 d[http://aalt.law.uh.edu/E2/KB27no227/aKB27no227fronts/IMG_0192.htm]
 
−
|-
 
  
  
Line 739: Line 686:
  
  
−
! <B>*Rex v. John son of John le Templer, Agnes wife of John son of John le Templer, Thomas son of Ralph le Freynssh, Joan wife of Thomas son of Ralph le Freynssh, John brother of Thomas son of Ralph le Freynssh, Margery who was the wife of John le Freynssh </B>  
+
! <B>Rex v. </B>  
−
| Northamptonshire
+
|  
 
|  (Indict); (Enrol)
 
|  (Indict); (Enrol)
−
| King's Bench
 
−
| They were convicted in the King's Bench of a trespass against Walter son of Henry le Templer of Hothorp
 
 
|  
 
|  
−
| Main: ; Other: KB27/227, m 103 (capias sicut pluries for the quindene of Easter) [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/E2/KB27no227/aKB27no227fronts/IMG_0216.htm]
+
|
 +
|
 +
| Main: ; Other:  
 
|-
 
|-
 +
  
  
Line 771: Line 719:
  
  
−
! <B>Rex v. John Umfrey of Swansea, Hugh Prig of Swansea, Peter, parson of the church of Long Stanton, Roger brother of Peter, parson of the church of Long Stanton </B>  
+
! <B>Rex v. </B>  
−
| Cambridgeshire Huntingdonshire
+
|  
 
|  (Indict); (Enrol)
 
|  (Indict); (Enrol)
−
| Oyer and Terminer
 
−
| trespass against John de Puseaux, John de Jareho, John de Acherus, Peter le Roy de Marolio, executors of the will of William de Loriaco, formerly parson of the church 'de Haliwell', and also against Jordan de Hemyngford; the accused have been convicted before justices before John de Mitford and his associates, justices of oyer and terminer
 
 
|  
 
|  
−
| Main: ; Other: KB27/227, m 101 d (capias sicut pluries, quindene of Easter) [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/E2/KB27no227/aKB27no227fronts/IMG_0195.htm]
+
|
 +
|
 +
| Main: ; Other:  
 
|-
 
|-
  
Line 827: Line 775:
  
  
−
! <B>Rex v. John Wade, John fitz Andrew of Toternho, Philip son of Hugh le Prest, William his brother </B>  
+
! <B>Rex v. </B>  
−
| Bucks
 
−
|  (Indict);  (Enrol)
 
 
|  
 
|  
−
| capias in trespass case brought by John son of Ralph de Muresle
+
| (Indict); (Enrol)
−
| sicut prius - capias xv Easter
+
|
−
| Main: []; Other: KB27/227, m Rex 100f[http://aalt.law.uh.edu/E2/KB27no227/aKB27no227fronts/IMG_0210.htm]
+
|
 +
|  
 +
| Main: ; Other:  
 
|-
 
|-
  
Line 839: Line 787:
  
  
−
! <B>Rex v. William fitz Waryn and Henry Severe</B>  
+
 
−
|Wilts
+
! <B>Rex v. </B>  
−
| (Indict); (Enrol)  
+
|  
 +
| (Indict); (Enrol)
 +
|
 
|  
 
|  
−
| capias ad satisfaciendum in trespass case brought by William Paynel
+
|  
−
| sicut prius - capias xv Easter
+
| Main: ; Other:  
−
| Main: []; Other: KB27/227, m Rex 100f [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/E2/KB27no227/aKB27no227fronts/IMG_0210.htm]
 
 
|-
 
|-
  
  
−
! <B>Rex v. Maud who was the wife of Martin Wynter </B>  
+
! <B>Rex v. </B>  
−
| Norfolk
+
|  
 
|  (Indict); (Enrol)
 
|  (Indict); (Enrol)
 
|  
 
|  
−
| Maud failed to prosecute her appeal against Henry de Segrave for the death of Martin Wynter, once her husband
 
 
|  
 
|  
−
| Main: ; Other: KB27/227, m 101 f (capias sicut pluries, for quindene of Easter) [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/E2/KB27no227/aKB27no227fronts/IMG_0212.htm]
+
|
 +
| Main: ; Other:  
 
|-
 
|-
 +
  
  

Revision as of 16:08, 10 April 2023


Calendar for Rex Rolls, Years 1317-1327, arranged by defendant
By Jens Roehrkasten


Search this index by using the Control-F function.

Abbreviations:

Under Construction:


Admin

Link:
Link:
Link: f[]

A

________Parties___________ County Dates Jurisdiction _________Offense___________ _________Substance_________ _______Links_______
Main: f[]; Other: f[]
Main: KB27/ , m. Rex f[]; Other:


B


________Parties___________ County Dates Jurisdiction _________Offense___________ _________Substance_________ _______Links_______
Rex v. (Indict); (Enrol) Main: ; Other:
Rex v. (Indict); (Enrol) Main: ; Other:



C

£


________Parties___________ County Dates Jurisdiction _________Offense___________ _________Substance_________ _______Links_______
Rex v. (Indict); (Enrol) Main: ; Other:
Rex v. (Indict); (Enrol) Main: ; Other:


D

£


________Parties___________ County Dates Jurisdiction _________Offense___________ _________Substance_________ _______Links_______
Rex v. (Indict); (Enrol) Main: ; Other:
Rex v. (Indict); (Enrol) Main: ; Other:
Rex v. (Indict); (Enrol) Main: ; Other:
Rex v. (Indict); (Enrol) Main: ; Other:
Rex v. (Indict); (Enrol) Main: ; Other:


E


________Parties___________ County Dates Jurisdiction _________Offense___________ _________Substance_________ _______Links_______


F


________Parties___________ County Dates Jurisdiction _________Offense___________ _________Substance_________ _______Links_______


G


________Parties___________ County Dates Jurisdiction _________Offense___________ _________Substance_________ _______Links_______


H


________Parties___________ County Dates Jurisdiction _________Offense___________ _________Substance_________ _______Links_______
Rex v. (Indict); (Enrol) Main: ; Other:


I


________Parties___________ County Dates Jurisdiction _________Offense___________ _________Substance_________ _______Links_______


J


________Parties___________ County Dates Jurisdiction _________Offense___________ _________Substance_________ _______Links_______


K


________Parties___________ County Dates Jurisdiction _________Offense___________ _________Substance_________ _______Links_______


L


________Parties___________ County Dates Jurisdiction _________Offense___________ _________Substance_________ _______Links_______
Rex v. (Indict); (Enrol) Main: ; Other:
Rex v. (Indict); (Enrol) Main: ; Other:


M


________Parties___________ County Dates Jurisdiction _________Offense___________ _________Substance_________ _______Links_______


N


________Parties___________ County Dates Jurisdiction _________Offense___________ _________Substance_________ _______Links_______


O


________Parties___________ County Dates Jurisdiction _________Offense___________ _________Substance_________ _______Links_______
Rex v. (Indict); (Enrol) Main: ; Other:


P


________Parties___________ County Dates Jurisdiction _________Offense___________ _________Substance_________ _______Links_______
Rex v. (Indict); (Enrol) Main: ; Other:
Rex v. (Indict); (Enrol) Main: ; Other:


Q


________Parties___________ County Dates Jurisdiction _________Offense___________ _________Substance_________ _______Links_______


R


________Parties___________ County Dates Jurisdiction _________Offense___________ _________Substance_________ _______Links_______


S


________Parties___________ County Dates Jurisdiction _________Offense___________ _________Substance_________ _______Links_______
Rex v. (Indict); (Enrol) Main: ; Other:
! Rex v. (Indict); (Enrol) Main: ; Other:
Rex v. (Indict); (Enrol) Main: ; Other:


T


________Parties___________ County Dates Jurisdiction _________Offense___________ _________Substance_________ _______Links_______
Rex v. (Indict); (Enrol) Main: ; Other:


U


________Parties___________ County Dates Jurisdiction _________Offense___________ _________Substance_________ _______Links_______
Rex v. (Indict); (Enrol) Main: ; Other:


V


________Parties___________ County Dates Jurisdiction _________Offense___________ _________Substance_________ _______Links_______


W


________Parties___________ County Dates Jurisdiction _________Offense___________ _________Substance_________ _______Links_______
Rex v. (Indict); (Enrol) Main: ; Other:
Rex v. (Indict); (Enrol) Main: ; Other:
Rex v. (Indict); (Enrol) Main: ; Other:


X


________Parties___________ County Dates Jurisdiction _________Offense___________ _________Substance_________ _______Links_______


Y


________Parties___________ County Dates Jurisdiction _________Offense___________ _________Substance_________ _______Links_______


Z


________Parties___________ County Dates Jurisdiction _________Offense___________ _________Substance_________ _______Links_______
Retrieved from "https://waalt.uh.edu/index.php?title=TemplateforRexRolls&oldid=96820"