Difference between revisions of "STAC Radcliffe"
From Waalt
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | ''' B ''' Bill of Complaint ''' Dr ''' Demurrer ''' A ''' Answer ''' Rn ''' Replication ''' Rr ''' Rejoinder | ||
+ | ''' C ''' Commission ''' I ''' Interrogatories ''' D ''' Deposition | ||
+ | <BR> <BR> | ||
+ | |||
''' Radcliff, Alexander''' | ''' Radcliff, Alexander''' | ||
− | *STAC 5/R39/1 - B - - Alexander Radcliff v John Townly, Thomas Barcroft et al | + | *STAC 5/R39/1 - B - - - Alexander Radcliff v John Townly, Thomas Barcroft et al |
− | *STAC 5/R36/40 - B - - Alexander Radcliff v Frances Lady Townley | + | *STAC 5/R36/40 - B - - - Alexander Radcliff v Frances Lady Townley |
− | + | *STAC 5/R26/30 - I D - 8 Eliz - - Alexander Radcliffe v Sir Thomas Heskett | |
− | *STAC 5/R26/30 - I D - 8 Eliz - Alexander Radcliffe v Sir Thomas Heskett | + | *STAC 5/R2/31 - C A - 8 Eliz - - Alexander Radclyff v Alexander Houghton |
− | *STAC 5/R2/31 - C A - 8 Eliz - Alexander Radclyff v Alexander Houghton | + | *STAC 5/R6/21 - I D - 8 Eliz - - Alexander Radcliffe v Thomas Hesketh, John Townley et al |
− | *STAC 5/R6/21 - I D - 8 Eliz - Alexander Radcliffe v Thomas Hesketh, John Townley et al | + | *STAC 5/R25/18 - I D - - - Alexander Radclyff v Sir Thomas Heskett, Ralph Rushton et al |
''' Radcliff, Francis ''' | ''' Radcliff, Francis ''' | ||
− | *STAC 5/R9/22 - B A - 21 Eliz - Francis Radcliffe v Edward Blamyre, Edward Mylner et al | + | *STAC 5/R9/22 - B A - 21 Eliz - - Francis Radcliffe v Edward Blamyre, Edward Mylner et al |
''' Radcliffe, Henry ''' | ''' Radcliffe, Henry ''' | ||
− | *STAC 5/R36/32 - B A - 25 Eliz - Sir Henry Radcliffe v Richard White, John Hockley et al | + | *STAC 5/R36/32 - B A - 25 Eliz - - Sir Henry Radcliffe v Richard White, John Hockley et al |
− | *STAC 5/R41/38 - I D - 25 Eliz - Sir Henry Radclyffe v Richard White | + | *STAC 5/R41/38 - I D - 25 Eliz - - Sir Henry Radclyffe v Richard White |
− | *STAC 5/R38/1 - I D - 24 Eliz - Sir Henry Ratcliff v John Hockley Sr et al | + | *STAC 5/R38/1 - I D - 24 Eliz - - Sir Henry Ratcliff v John Hockley Sr et al |
− | *STAC 5/R23/9 - I D - 25 Eliz - Sir Henry Radclyff v John Hockley Jr, Nicholas Screvyn et al | + | *STAC 5/R23/9 - I D - 25 Eliz - - Sir Henry Radclyff v John Hockley Jr, Nicholas Screvyn et al |
''' Radcliffe, Joane ''' | ''' Radcliffe, Joane ''' | ||
− | *STAC 5/R29/34 - B A C I D - 25 Eliz - Joane Radcliffe v John Gawen, George Fleetcrofte | + | *STAC 5/R29/34 - B A C I D - 25 Eliz - - Joane Radcliffe v John Gawen, George Fleetcrofte |
− | *STAC 5/R36/3 - I D - 25 Eliz - Sir John Radcliff v John Gawen, George Flyteroft et al | + | *STAC 5/R36/3 - I D - 25 Eliz - - Sir John Radcliff v John Gawen, George Flyteroft et al |
+ | *STAC 5/R13/31 - I D - 25 Eliz - - Sir John Radcliffe v Gilbert Sherington, Ralph Worseley et al | ||
''' Radcliffe John ''' | ''' Radcliffe John ''' | ||
− | *STAC 5/R20/15 - B A - 22 Eliz - John Radcliffe Sr v William Radcliffe, Robert Radcliffe, Edmund Buckley | + | *STAC 5/R20/15 - B A - 22 Eliz - - John Radcliffe Sr v William Radcliffe, Robert Radcliffe, Edmund Buckley et al |
− | |||
''' Radcliff, Katherine ''' | ''' Radcliff, Katherine ''' | ||
− | *STAC 5/R38/20 - B Rn Rr - 36 Eliz - Katheryne Radcliffe, Alice Dobson v William Tyndall, William Rogers et al | + | *STAC 5/R38/20 - B Rn Rr - 36 Eliz - - Katheryne Radcliffe, Alice Dobson v William Tyndall, William Rogers et al |
− | *STAC 5/R37/27 - I D - 36 Eliz - Katherine Radcliffe, Alice Dobson v William Tindall et al | + | *STAC 5/R37/27 - I D - 36 Eliz - - Katherine Radcliffe, Alice Dobson v William Tindall et al |
+ | |||
+ | ''' Radcliffe, Owen ''' | ||
+ | *STAC 5/R42/18 - B - 19 Eliz - - Owen Radclife v Thomas Maningham | ||
+ | |||
+ | ''' Radcliffe, Owen ''' | ||
+ | *STAC 5/R33/9 - B - 21 Eliz - - Owen Radcliffe v John Wright, Andrew Mytten et al | ||
+ | |||
+ | ''' Radcliffe, Owen ''' | ||
+ | *STAC 5/R12/20 - B Dr - 32 Eliz - London - Owen Radcliffe v Christopher Meade | ||
+ | **see [[STAC co London]] | ||
''' Radcliffe, Owen ''' | ''' Radcliffe, Owen ''' | ||
− | + | *STAC 5/R14/25 - B A - 33 Eliz - Cambridgeshire - Owen Radcliffe v Christopher Meade, Adam Tabram et al | |
− | + | **see [[STAC co Cambridge]] | |
− | |||
− | *STAC 5/R14/25 - B A - 33 Eliz - Owen Radcliffe v Christopher Meade, Adam Tabram et al | ||
− | * | ||
''' Radcliffe, Thomas ''' | ''' Radcliffe, Thomas ''' | ||
− | *STAC 5/R35/35 - B A Rn C I D - 31 Eliz - Thomas Radcliffe v John Watson, Ambrose Lancaster | + | *STAC 5/R35/35 - B A Rn C I D - 31 Eliz - - Thomas Radcliffe v John Watson, Ambrose Lancaster |
− | *STAC 5/R30/21 - I D - 31 Eliz - Thomas Ratcliff v John Watson, Ambrose Lancaster et al | + | *STAC 5/R30/21 - I D - 31 Eliz - - Thomas Ratcliff v John Watson, Ambrose Lancaster et al |
− | *STAC 5/R15/13 - C I D - 32 Eliz - Thomas Radcliffe v John Watson et al | + | *STAC 5/R15/13 - C I D - 32 Eliz - - Thomas Radcliffe v John Watson et al |
− | *STAC 5/R32/36 - I D - 31 Eliz - Thomas Radcliff v Ambrose Gowland | + | *STAC 5/R32/36 - I D - 31 Eliz - - Thomas Radcliff v Ambrose Gowland |
+ | |||
+ | ''' Radcliff, William ''' | ||
+ | *STAC 5/R41/3 - B A Rn - - - William Radcliff v Robert Holme | ||
''' Radcliff, William ''' | ''' Radcliff, William ''' | ||
− | + | *STAC 5/R31/9 - B A Rn Rr - 30 Eliz - Lancashire - William Radcliff v Richard Vaughan | |
− | *STAC 5/R31/9 - B A Rn Rr - 30 Eliz - William Radcliff v Richard Vaughan | + | *STAC 5/R12/15 - I D - 30 Eliz - Lancashire - William Radcliffe v Richard Vaughan et uxor |
− | *STAC 5/R12/15 - I D - 30 Eliz - William Radcliffe v Richard Vaughan et uxor | + | **see [[STAC co Lancaster]] |
− | ''' | + | '''Notes, Additions and Corrections''' |
+ | *STAC 5/R36/32 - Comes Sussex plt White et al deftes the place of the Close where the Ryott was Comitted was mistaken and the Court Ordred the plt to exhibit a new Bill and the old to Surcease; without Costes to eyther side. BL Harley 2143 f.9v - Tr 24 Eliz | ||
+ | *STAC 7/14/33 - TNA Note: Middleton: Affray concerning tithe corn | ||
+ | *STAC 7/14/33 - moved to [[STAC Ratcliffe]] | ||
*Ratcliffe v Ashton - STAC 5/R2/12, STAC 7/14/33, STAC 5/R24/20 see [[STAC Ratcliffe]] | *Ratcliffe v Ashton - STAC 5/R2/12, STAC 7/14/33, STAC 5/R24/20 see [[STAC Ratcliffe]] | ||
− | |||
*Ratcliffe v Gabbatt - STAC 5/R23/25 see [[STAC Ratcliffe]] | *Ratcliffe v Gabbatt - STAC 5/R23/25 see [[STAC Ratcliffe]] | ||
− | |||
− | |||
*Ratcliffe v Lascelles - STAC 5/R23/1, STAC 5/R28/22 see [[STAC Ratcliffe]] | *Ratcliffe v Lascelles - STAC 5/R23/1, STAC 5/R28/22 see [[STAC Ratcliffe]] | ||
− | |||
− | |||
*Ratcliffe v Ratcliffe - STAC 5/R41/6, see [[STAC Ratcliffe]] | *Ratcliffe v Ratcliffe - STAC 5/R41/6, see [[STAC Ratcliffe]] | ||
− | |||
*Ratcliffe v Rogers - STAC 5/R21/28 see [[STAC Ratcliffe]] | *Ratcliffe v Rogers - STAC 5/R21/28 see [[STAC Ratcliffe]] | ||
*Ratcliffe v Shaw - STAC 5/R37/39, STAC 5/R32/26 see [[STAC Ratcliffe]] | *Ratcliffe v Shaw - STAC 5/R37/39, STAC 5/R32/26 see [[STAC Ratcliffe]] | ||
*Ratcliffe v Stebbing - STAC 5/R39/33 see [[STAC Ratcliffe]] | *Ratcliffe v Stebbing - STAC 5/R39/33 see [[STAC Ratcliffe]] | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− |
Latest revision as of 21:12, 31 October 2022
B Bill of Complaint Dr Demurrer A Answer Rn Replication Rr Rejoinder
C Commission I Interrogatories D Deposition
Radcliff, Alexander
- STAC 5/R39/1 - B - - - Alexander Radcliff v John Townly, Thomas Barcroft et al
- STAC 5/R36/40 - B - - - Alexander Radcliff v Frances Lady Townley
- STAC 5/R26/30 - I D - 8 Eliz - - Alexander Radcliffe v Sir Thomas Heskett
- STAC 5/R2/31 - C A - 8 Eliz - - Alexander Radclyff v Alexander Houghton
- STAC 5/R6/21 - I D - 8 Eliz - - Alexander Radcliffe v Thomas Hesketh, John Townley et al
- STAC 5/R25/18 - I D - - - Alexander Radclyff v Sir Thomas Heskett, Ralph Rushton et al
Radcliff, Francis
- STAC 5/R9/22 - B A - 21 Eliz - - Francis Radcliffe v Edward Blamyre, Edward Mylner et al
Radcliffe, Henry
- STAC 5/R36/32 - B A - 25 Eliz - - Sir Henry Radcliffe v Richard White, John Hockley et al
- STAC 5/R41/38 - I D - 25 Eliz - - Sir Henry Radclyffe v Richard White
- STAC 5/R38/1 - I D - 24 Eliz - - Sir Henry Ratcliff v John Hockley Sr et al
- STAC 5/R23/9 - I D - 25 Eliz - - Sir Henry Radclyff v John Hockley Jr, Nicholas Screvyn et al
Radcliffe, Joane
- STAC 5/R29/34 - B A C I D - 25 Eliz - - Joane Radcliffe v John Gawen, George Fleetcrofte
- STAC 5/R36/3 - I D - 25 Eliz - - Sir John Radcliff v John Gawen, George Flyteroft et al
- STAC 5/R13/31 - I D - 25 Eliz - - Sir John Radcliffe v Gilbert Sherington, Ralph Worseley et al
Radcliffe John
- STAC 5/R20/15 - B A - 22 Eliz - - John Radcliffe Sr v William Radcliffe, Robert Radcliffe, Edmund Buckley et al
Radcliff, Katherine
- STAC 5/R38/20 - B Rn Rr - 36 Eliz - - Katheryne Radcliffe, Alice Dobson v William Tyndall, William Rogers et al
- STAC 5/R37/27 - I D - 36 Eliz - - Katherine Radcliffe, Alice Dobson v William Tindall et al
Radcliffe, Owen
- STAC 5/R42/18 - B - 19 Eliz - - Owen Radclife v Thomas Maningham
Radcliffe, Owen
- STAC 5/R33/9 - B - 21 Eliz - - Owen Radcliffe v John Wright, Andrew Mytten et al
Radcliffe, Owen
- STAC 5/R12/20 - B Dr - 32 Eliz - London - Owen Radcliffe v Christopher Meade
- see STAC co London
Radcliffe, Owen
- STAC 5/R14/25 - B A - 33 Eliz - Cambridgeshire - Owen Radcliffe v Christopher Meade, Adam Tabram et al
Radcliffe, Thomas
- STAC 5/R35/35 - B A Rn C I D - 31 Eliz - - Thomas Radcliffe v John Watson, Ambrose Lancaster
- STAC 5/R30/21 - I D - 31 Eliz - - Thomas Ratcliff v John Watson, Ambrose Lancaster et al
- STAC 5/R15/13 - C I D - 32 Eliz - - Thomas Radcliffe v John Watson et al
- STAC 5/R32/36 - I D - 31 Eliz - - Thomas Radcliff v Ambrose Gowland
Radcliff, William
- STAC 5/R41/3 - B A Rn - - - William Radcliff v Robert Holme
Radcliff, William
- STAC 5/R31/9 - B A Rn Rr - 30 Eliz - Lancashire - William Radcliff v Richard Vaughan
- STAC 5/R12/15 - I D - 30 Eliz - Lancashire - William Radcliffe v Richard Vaughan et uxor
Notes, Additions and Corrections
- STAC 5/R36/32 - Comes Sussex plt White et al deftes the place of the Close where the Ryott was Comitted was mistaken and the Court Ordred the plt to exhibit a new Bill and the old to Surcease; without Costes to eyther side. BL Harley 2143 f.9v - Tr 24 Eliz
- STAC 7/14/33 - TNA Note: Middleton: Affray concerning tithe corn
- STAC 7/14/33 - moved to STAC Ratcliffe
- Ratcliffe v Ashton - STAC 5/R2/12, STAC 7/14/33, STAC 5/R24/20 see STAC Ratcliffe
- Ratcliffe v Gabbatt - STAC 5/R23/25 see STAC Ratcliffe
- Ratcliffe v Lascelles - STAC 5/R23/1, STAC 5/R28/22 see STAC Ratcliffe
- Ratcliffe v Ratcliffe - STAC 5/R41/6, see STAC Ratcliffe
- Ratcliffe v Rogers - STAC 5/R21/28 see STAC Ratcliffe
- Ratcliffe v Shaw - STAC 5/R37/39, STAC 5/R32/26 see STAC Ratcliffe
- Ratcliffe v Stebbing - STAC 5/R39/33 see STAC Ratcliffe