Difference between revisions of "STAC Holmes"
From Waalt
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
''' Holmes, Joan ''' | ''' Holmes, Joan ''' | ||
− | *STAC 7/3/5 - - - Yorkshire - Joan Holmes v Sir William Gascoygne et Thomas et Francis filij et al | + | *STAC 7/3/5 - - - Yorkshire WR - Joan Holmes v Sir William Gascoygne et Thomas et Francis filij et al |
+ | **[[STAC co York WR]] | ||
''' Holmes, Richard ''' | ''' Holmes, Richard ''' | ||
*STAC 5/H37/25 - B - 23 Eliz - Richard Holme v George Pyes, Humphrey Hunt et al | *STAC 5/H37/25 - B - 23 Eliz - Richard Holme v George Pyes, Humphrey Hunt et al | ||
+ | |||
+ | ''' Holmes, Richard ''' | ||
*STAC 5/H74/39 - I D - 33 Eliz - Richard Holmes, Edward Smith et al v Edmund Snape et al | *STAC 5/H74/39 - I D - 33 Eliz - Richard Holmes, Edward Smith et al v Edmund Snape et al | ||
+ | |||
+ | ''' Holmes, Richard ''' | ||
*STAC 5/H47/24 - B A Dr - 36 Eliz - Richard Holmes v Henry Bromhead, Henry Lane et al | *STAC 5/H47/24 - B A Dr - 36 Eliz - Richard Holmes v Henry Bromhead, Henry Lane et al | ||
*STAC 5/H25/33 - I D - 36 Eliz - Richard Holmes v Henry Bromhed | *STAC 5/H25/33 - I D - 36 Eliz - Richard Holmes v Henry Bromhed | ||
+ | |||
+ | ''' Holmes, Richard ''' | ||
*STAC 5/H25/12 - B - 38 Eliz - Richard Holmes v Richard Holmes, William Lowe et al | *STAC 5/H25/12 - B - 38 Eliz - Richard Holmes v Richard Holmes, William Lowe et al | ||
*STAC 5/H60/37 - B A C I D - 39 Eliz - Richard Holmes v Richard Holmes Sr, Margaret Tayler | *STAC 5/H60/37 - B A C I D - 39 Eliz - Richard Holmes v Richard Holmes Sr, Margaret Tayler | ||
Line 16: | Line 23: | ||
*STAC 5/H72/35 - Rr - 39 Eliz - Richard Holme v John Lafeild | *STAC 5/H72/35 - Rr - 39 Eliz - Richard Holme v John Lafeild | ||
*STAC 5/H68/6 - I D - 39 Eliz - Richard Holmes v William Lawn | *STAC 5/H68/6 - I D - 39 Eliz - Richard Holmes v William Lawn | ||
− | *STAC 5/H63/33 - B A C I D - 40 Eliz - Richard Holme v William Holme, Henry Guy et al | + | |
− | *STAC 5/H66/9 - Rn - 40 Eliz - Richard Holme v Bryan Ferrar, William Holme | + | ''' Holmes, Richard ''' |
− | *STAC 5/H1/12 - I D - 40 Eliz - Richard Holme v William Holme, Bryan Farrer, Humphrey Robinson alias Harrison | + | *STAC 5/H63/33 - B A C I D - 40 Eliz - Lancashire - Richard Holme v William Holme, Henry Guy et al |
+ | *STAC 5/H66/9 - Rn - 40 Eliz - Lancashire - Richard Holme v Bryan Ferrar, William Holme | ||
+ | *STAC 5/H1/12 - I D - 40 Eliz - Lancashire - Richard Holme v William Holme, Bryan Farrer, Humphrey Robinson alias Harrison | ||
+ | **see [[STAC co Lancaster]] | ||
''' Holmes, Thomas ''' | ''' Holmes, Thomas ''' | ||
Line 30: | Line 40: | ||
''' Attorney General ''' | ''' Attorney General ''' | ||
*STAC 5/A58/10 - B - - Lancashire - AG v Robert Holmes, James Elersall et al. Report [[STAC 5/A58/10r]] | *STAC 5/A58/10 - B - - Lancashire - AG v Robert Holmes, James Elersall et al. Report [[STAC 5/A58/10r]] | ||
+ | **[[STAC co Lancaster]] | ||
''' Almoner''' | ''' Almoner''' | ||
*STAC 5/A2/29 - B A - 14 Eliz - Suffolk - Almoner v John Holmes | *STAC 5/A2/29 - B A - 14 Eliz - Suffolk - Almoner v John Holmes | ||
− | *STAC 5/A9/34 - I D - 14 Eliz - Almoner v John Holmes | + | *STAC 5/A9/34 - I D - 14 Eliz - Suffolk - Almoner v John Holmes |
− | * | + | **[[STAC co Suffolk]] |
− | *STAC | ||
− | ''' | + | '''Notes, Additions and Corrections''' |
− | * | + | *STAC 5/A3/7 and STAC 5/A37/5 - moved to [[STAC Helme]] |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
*Holmes v Paxford - STAC 7/23/48 see [[STAC Hulmes]] | *Holmes v Paxford - STAC 7/23/48 see [[STAC Hulmes]] | ||
− | |||
*Holmes v Reynolds - STAC 5/H26/16, STAC 5/H77/32, STAC 5/H10/1, STAC 5/H10/14, STAC 5/H10/26, STAC 5/H15/28 see [[STAC Hulmes]] | *Holmes v Reynolds - STAC 5/H26/16, STAC 5/H77/32, STAC 5/H10/1, STAC 5/H10/14, STAC 5/H10/26, STAC 5/H15/28 see [[STAC Hulmes]] | ||
*Holmes v Trafford - STAC 5/H35/28 see [[STAC Hulmes]] | *Holmes v Trafford - STAC 5/H35/28 see [[STAC Hulmes]] | ||
Line 50: | Line 55: | ||
*Holmes v Watts - STAC 5/H65/14, STAC 7/23/47 see [[STAC Hulmes]] | *Holmes v Watts - STAC 5/H65/14, STAC 7/23/47 see [[STAC Hulmes]] | ||
*Holmes v Wright - STAC 5/H44/4, STAC 5/H45/37 see [[STAC Hulmes]] | *Holmes v Wright - STAC 5/H44/4, STAC 5/H45/37 see [[STAC Hulmes]] | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− |
Latest revision as of 09:24, 11 September 2021
B Bill of Complaint Dr Demurrer A Answer Rn Replication Rr Rejoinder C Commission I Interrogatories D Deposition
Holmes, Joan
- STAC 7/3/5 - - - Yorkshire WR - Joan Holmes v Sir William Gascoygne et Thomas et Francis filij et al
Holmes, Richard
- STAC 5/H37/25 - B - 23 Eliz - Richard Holme v George Pyes, Humphrey Hunt et al
Holmes, Richard
- STAC 5/H74/39 - I D - 33 Eliz - Richard Holmes, Edward Smith et al v Edmund Snape et al
Holmes, Richard
- STAC 5/H47/24 - B A Dr - 36 Eliz - Richard Holmes v Henry Bromhead, Henry Lane et al
- STAC 5/H25/33 - I D - 36 Eliz - Richard Holmes v Henry Bromhed
Holmes, Richard
- STAC 5/H25/12 - B - 38 Eliz - Richard Holmes v Richard Holmes, William Lowe et al
- STAC 5/H60/37 - B A C I D - 39 Eliz - Richard Holmes v Richard Holmes Sr, Margaret Tayler
- STAC 5/H60/3 - Rn - 39 Eliz - Richard Holmes v William Lowe, Margaret Tailer et al
- STAC 5/H3/27 - A - 39 Eliz - Richard Holmes v William Law
- STAC 5/H72/35 - Rr - 39 Eliz - Richard Holme v John Lafeild
- STAC 5/H68/6 - I D - 39 Eliz - Richard Holmes v William Lawn
Holmes, Richard
- STAC 5/H63/33 - B A C I D - 40 Eliz - Lancashire - Richard Holme v William Holme, Henry Guy et al
- STAC 5/H66/9 - Rn - 40 Eliz - Lancashire - Richard Holme v Bryan Ferrar, William Holme
- STAC 5/H1/12 - I D - 40 Eliz - Lancashire - Richard Holme v William Holme, Bryan Farrer, Humphrey Robinson alias Harrison
Holmes, Thomas
- STAC 5/H64/15 - B A Rn Rr - 31 Eliz - Thomas Holmes v William Barnes, Thomas Hussy et al
- STAC 5/H39/21 - I D - 31 Eliz - Thomas Holmes v Thomas Hussey, William Barnes et al
Holme, William
- STAC 5/H4/10 - B A - 37 Eliz - William Holme v John Kybbonsone, John Layffyld
- STAC 5/H35/2 - I D - 38 Eliz - William Holme v John Hayffyld et al
Attorney General
- STAC 5/A58/10 - B - - Lancashire - AG v Robert Holmes, James Elersall et al. Report STAC 5/A58/10r
Almoner
- STAC 5/A2/29 - B A - 14 Eliz - Suffolk - Almoner v John Holmes
- STAC 5/A9/34 - I D - 14 Eliz - Suffolk - Almoner v John Holmes
Notes, Additions and Corrections
- STAC 5/A3/7 and STAC 5/A37/5 - moved to STAC Helme
- Holmes v Paxford - STAC 7/23/48 see STAC Hulmes
- Holmes v Reynolds - STAC 5/H26/16, STAC 5/H77/32, STAC 5/H10/1, STAC 5/H10/14, STAC 5/H10/26, STAC 5/H15/28 see STAC Hulmes
- Holmes v Trafford - STAC 5/H35/28 see STAC Hulmes
- Holmes v Wardley - STAC 5/H70/26, STAC 5/H30/26 see STAC Hoome
- Holmes v Watts - STAC 5/H65/14, STAC 7/23/47 see STAC Hulmes
- Holmes v Wright - STAC 5/H44/4, STAC 5/H45/37 see STAC Hulmes