Difference between revisions of "STAC Heveningham"

From Waalt
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
''' B ''' Bill of Complaint ''' Dr ''' Demurrer  ''' A ''' Answer ''' Rn ''' Replication ''' Rr ''' Rejoinder
 +
''' C ''' Commission ''' I ''' Interrogatories ''' D ''' Deposition
 +
<BR> <BR>
 +
 
''' Heveningham, Arthur '''
 
''' Heveningham, Arthur '''
 
*STAC 5/H18/2 - B A - 25 Eliz - Arthur Heveningham v Edward Flowerdewe, Henry Appley et al
 
*STAC 5/H18/2 - B A - 25 Eliz - Arthur Heveningham v Edward Flowerdewe, Henry Appley et al
 
*STAC 5/H37/37 - I D - 25 Eliz - Arthur Haveningham v Edward Flowerdewe
 
*STAC 5/H37/37 - I D - 25 Eliz - Arthur Haveningham v Edward Flowerdewe
 
*STAC 5/H9/35 - I D - 25 Eliz - Sir Arthur Heveningham v Edward Flowerden
 
*STAC 5/H9/35 - I D - 25 Eliz - Sir Arthur Heveningham v Edward Flowerden
 +
 +
''' Heveningham, Arthur '''
 
*STAC 5/H3/7 - B A C - 33 Eliz - Sir Arthur Hevingham v Francis Wyndham, Sir William Paston, Nathaniell Bacon, William Blenhasset et al
 
*STAC 5/H3/7 - B A C - 33 Eliz - Sir Arthur Hevingham v Francis Wyndham, Sir William Paston, Nathaniell Bacon, William Blenhasset et al
−
*STAC 5/H60/11 - I D - 33 Eliz - Sir Arthur Heviningham v Henry Norgate
+
*STAC 5/H60/11 - I D - 33 Eliz - Sir Arthur Heviningham v Henry Norgate  
 
*STAC 5/H43/39 - I D - 33 Eliz - Sir Arthur Heveningham v Nathaniell Bacon, Stephen Drury
 
*STAC 5/H43/39 - I D - 33 Eliz - Sir Arthur Heveningham v Nathaniell Bacon, Stephen Drury
  
 
''' Attorney General '''
 
''' Attorney General '''
 
*STAC 5/A6/25 - I D - 39 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Sir Arthur Hevenham
 
*STAC 5/A6/25 - I D - 39 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Sir Arthur Hevenham
 +
**see [[STAC co Norfolk]]
  
−
''' Bevan Case Index '''
+
'''Notes, Additions and Corrections'''
−
*Heveningham v Flowerdew - STAC 5/H18/2, STAC 5/H9/35, STAC 5/H37/37
 
−
*Heveningham v Wyndham - STAC 5/H3/7, STAC 5/H43/39, STAC 5/H60/11
 
−
*Attorney General v Heveningham - STAC 5/A6/25
 
−
 
 
−
'''Notes, Additions and Corrections'''  
 
−
*STAC 5/A6/25 - Interrogatories to be ministered to Sir Arthur Heveningham knight on the part and behalf of HM. Imp did not the Lords of HM most hon PC about the one and thirty yeare of HM raygne direct ther letters to you Sir Arthur Heveningham, Sir Edward Cleer, Sir Robert Southwell knights, Thomas Farmore, William Rugge and Charles Cornwales esquires to examine and ende a cause betwene Thomas Thwayte of Hardingham in Norfolk esq & Richard Thwaites one of the younger sons of the said Thomas of the one parte and Antony Thwayte eldest son of the said Thomas & Francis the wife of the said Anthony on the other parte according to equitie etc.
 

Revision as of 16:46, 17 May 2019

B Bill of Complaint Dr Demurrer A Answer Rn Replication Rr Rejoinder C Commission I Interrogatories D Deposition

Heveningham, Arthur

  • STAC 5/H18/2 - B A - 25 Eliz - Arthur Heveningham v Edward Flowerdewe, Henry Appley et al
  • STAC 5/H37/37 - I D - 25 Eliz - Arthur Haveningham v Edward Flowerdewe
  • STAC 5/H9/35 - I D - 25 Eliz - Sir Arthur Heveningham v Edward Flowerden

Heveningham, Arthur

  • STAC 5/H3/7 - B A C - 33 Eliz - Sir Arthur Hevingham v Francis Wyndham, Sir William Paston, Nathaniell Bacon, William Blenhasset et al
  • STAC 5/H60/11 - I D - 33 Eliz - Sir Arthur Heviningham v Henry Norgate
  • STAC 5/H43/39 - I D - 33 Eliz - Sir Arthur Heveningham v Nathaniell Bacon, Stephen Drury

Attorney General

  • STAC 5/A6/25 - I D - 39 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Sir Arthur Hevenham

Notes, Additions and Corrections

Retrieved from "https://waalt.uh.edu/index.php?title=STAC_Heveningham&oldid=82028"