Difference between revisions of "STAC Dane"
From Waalt
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
''' Dane, Richard ''' | ''' Dane, Richard ''' | ||
− | *STAC 5/D3/25 - B A Rn Rr - 19 Eliz - Bristol - Richard Dane v Philip Langley, Clement Barrons, Richard Cole, Thomas Callahill | + | *STAC 5/D3/25 - B A Rn Rr - 19 Eliz - Bristol - Richard Dane v Philip Langley, Clement Barrons, Richard Cole, Thomas Callahill, John Morgan, William Adams, Davie Barnes, Nicholas Dygen. Transcribed [[STAC 5/D3/25]] |
*STAC 5/D32/31 - I D - 20 Eliz - Bristol - Richard Dane v Philip Langley | *STAC 5/D32/31 - I D - 20 Eliz - Bristol - Richard Dane v Philip Langley | ||
Revision as of 10:33, 24 February 2019
B Bill of Complaint Dr Demurrer A Answer Rn Replication Rr Rejoinder C Commission I Interrogatories D Deposition
Dane, Richard
- STAC 5/D3/25 - B A Rn Rr - 19 Eliz - Bristol - Richard Dane v Philip Langley, Clement Barrons, Richard Cole, Thomas Callahill, John Morgan, William Adams, Davie Barnes, Nicholas Dygen. Transcribed STAC 5/D3/25
- STAC 5/D32/31 - I D - 20 Eliz - Bristol - Richard Dane v Philip Langley
Dane, John
- STAC 5/D2/36 - B - 17 Eliz - John Dane v William Westley et uxor, Elioner Hollins, William Morgan
- STAC 5/D27/27 - B A - 27 Eliz - John Dane v Robert Tampson, Colwaye Herne, John Maninge et al
- STAC 7/20/4 - - - John Dane v Robert Tampson et al
Dane, Nicholas
- STAC 5/D10/12 - B A - 10 Eliz - Nicholas Dane, Nicholas Franklyn v John Johnson, Paul Johnson, Henry Harrison et al
- STAC 5/D24/12 - I D - 5 Eliz - Nicholas Dane, Nicholas Frankclein v Nicholas Naisher et al
Bevan Case Index
- Dane v Johnson - STAC 5/D10/12
- Dane v Langley - STAC 5/D3/25, STAC 5/D32/31
- Dane v Naisher - STAC 5/D24/12
- Dane v Tampson - STAC 5/D27/27, STAC 7/20/4
- Dane v Westley - STAC 5/D2/36
Notes, Additions and Corrections
- STAC 5/D3/25 - Richard Dane of the City of Bristol merchant messuage in the parish of St Nicholas within the City of Bristol. A cargo of allum.