Difference between revisions of "C78 1878"
From Waalt
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 53: | Line 53: | ||
| 28 Nov | | 28 Nov | ||
| | | | ||
| − | | Need to enroll Railway Schemes of | + | | Need to enroll Railway Schemes of Arrangement |
| | | | ||
| IND1 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/IND1no16961B-vol13/IMG_0053.htm] | | IND1 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/IND1no16961B-vol13/IMG_0053.htm] | ||
|- | |- | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
! 1878 | ! 1878 | ||
Latest revision as of 01:56, 10 October 2014
| Overall C78 page [1] Major Contributor(s): Robert C. Palmer Minor Contributors please initial relevant rows |
| Cal_Year | Cal_Date | Regnal_Year | Parties | Subject Matter | Roll/Case_No. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1878 | C78/, no. [] | |||||
| 1878 | 25 Jan | Mary Rix widow v. William Bowles | C78/2252, no. 22 [2] | |||
| 1878 | 29 Jan | John Hamlyn; Jeffery Michelmor; John Winterbotham Batten; John Turneaux; and Edwin Tucker, five of the directors of the Buckfastleigh Totness and South Devon Railway Company | In the matter of the Railway Companies Act 1867 in relation to the Buckfastleigh Totness and South Devon Railway Company | C78/2252, no. 23 [3] | ||
| 1878 | 26 March | Jonathan Backhouse and Company v. Robert Hedley Chuarlton; Margaret Emily Charlton; Jane Ann Charlton; Alfred Charlton; Edward Charlton; and Thomas Charlton | C78/2252, no. 24 [4] | |||
| 1878 | 28 Nov | Need to enroll Railway Schemes of Arrangement | IND1 [5] | |||
| 1878 | C78/, no. [] |
