Difference between revisions of "STAC Chapman"
From Waalt
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
''' Chapman, Francis ''' | ''' Chapman, Francis ''' | ||
| − | *STAC 5/C55/20 - B Dr - 44 Eliz - - Francys Chapman v Roger Alexander, Richard Redferne et al | + | *STAC 5/C55/20 - B Dr - 44 Eliz - Staffordshire - Francys Chapman v Roger Alexander, Richard Redferne et al |
| + | **see [[STAC co Stafford]] | ||
''' Chapman, James ''' | ''' Chapman, James ''' | ||
| Line 20: | Line 21: | ||
''' Chapman, John ''' | ''' Chapman, John ''' | ||
*STAC 5/C62/22 - B A - 40 Eliz - - John Chapman v John Taylor, Roger Rowley et al | *STAC 5/C62/22 - B A - 40 Eliz - - John Chapman v John Taylor, Roger Rowley et al | ||
| − | *STAC 5/C5/17 - B A - 43 Eliz - - John Chapman v Thomas Humphrey, Edward Humphrey, Richard Ayloffe, Thomas Flacke et uxor , Thomas Shereman et al | + | |
| − | *STAC 5/C12/25 - I D - 43 Eliz - - John Chapman v Thomas Humffrey, Arthur Bett | + | ''' Chapman, John ''' |
| + | *STAC 5/C5/17 - B A - 43 Eliz - Essex - John Chapman v Thomas Humphrey, Edward Humphrey, Richard Ayloffe, Thomas Flacke et uxor, Thomas Shereman et al | ||
| + | *STAC 5/C12/25 - I D - 43 Eliz - Essex - John Chapman v Thomas Humffrey, Arthur Bett | ||
| + | **see [[STAC co Essex]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | ''' Chapman, John ''' | ||
*STAC 7/19/23 - - - - John Chapman v Thomas Plumm et al | *STAC 7/19/23 - - - - John Chapman v Thomas Plumm et al | ||
| Line 38: | Line 44: | ||
''' Chapman, Thomas ''' | ''' Chapman, Thomas ''' | ||
*STAC 5/C57/36 - B A - 20 Eliz - - Thomas Chapman v Ames Stuckley | *STAC 5/C57/36 - B A - 20 Eliz - - Thomas Chapman v Ames Stuckley | ||
| − | *STAC 5/C79/13 - Rn - - Thomas Chapman v Ames Stukeley | + | *STAC 5/C79/13 - Rn - - - Thomas Chapman v Ames Stukeley |
*STAC 5/C9/4 - I - 20 Eliz - - Thomas Chapman v Amis Stucley | *STAC 5/C9/4 - I - 20 Eliz - - Thomas Chapman v Amis Stucley | ||
''' Chapman, William ''' | ''' Chapman, William ''' | ||
| − | *STAC 5/C58/13 - B Dr - 26 Eliz - - William Chapman v William Swane, Edward Maynard | + | *STAC 5/C58/13 - B Dr - 26 Eliz - Kent - William Chapman v William Swane, Edward Maynard |
| + | **see [[STAC co Kent]] | ||
''' Atorney General ''' | ''' Atorney General ''' | ||
*STAC 7/17/48 - - - - AG v Nicholas Chapman et al | *STAC 7/17/48 - - - - AG v Nicholas Chapman et al | ||
| − | + | '''Notes, Additions and Corrections''' | |
| − | * | + | *STAC 7/19/24 - In 1593, the Privy Council received a “pittyfull complaint” from the aptly named Lamentation Chapman (from Leon Jackson) |
| − | |||
*Chapman v Chapman - STAC 5/C81/27STAC 5/C37/35, STAC 5/C41/36, STAC 5/C45/22, STAC 5/C47/34, STAC 5/C69/15, STAC 5/C38/10 see [[STAC Chepman]] | *Chapman v Chapman - STAC 5/C81/27STAC 5/C37/35, STAC 5/C41/36, STAC 5/C45/22, STAC 5/C47/34, STAC 5/C69/15, STAC 5/C38/10 see [[STAC Chepman]] | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
*Chapman v Reeve - STAC 5/C1/32 see [[STAC Chepman]] | *Chapman v Reeve - STAC 5/C1/32 see [[STAC Chepman]] | ||
*Chapman v Sampson - STAC 5/C44/31 see [[STAC Chepman]] | *Chapman v Sampson - STAC 5/C44/31 see [[STAC Chepman]] | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
*Chapman v Wood - STAC 5/C65/36 see [[STAC Chepman]] | *Chapman v Wood - STAC 5/C65/36 see [[STAC Chepman]] | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
Latest revision as of 21:37, 4 August 2025
B Bill of Complaint Dr Demurrer A Answer Rn Replication Rr Rejoinder
C Commission I Interrogatories D Deposition
Chapman, Beatrice
- STAC 5/C33/2 - B Dr - 31 Eliz - - Beatrice Chapman v John Plowright
Chapman, Digory
- STAC 5/C32/32 - B A C - 38 Eliz - - Degory Chapman v Robert Pearse
Chapman, Francis
- STAC 5/C55/20 - B Dr - 44 Eliz - Staffordshire - Francys Chapman v Roger Alexander, Richard Redferne et al
- see STAC co Stafford
Chapman, James
- STAC 5/C12/6 - I B A Rr Rn - 2 Eliz - Kent - James Chapman v William Pennye
- STAC 5/C23/1 - I D - 3 Eliz - Kent - James Chapman v William Peny et al
- STAC 5/C53/8 - I D - 3 Eliz - Kent - James Chapman v William Penny et al
Chapman, John
- STAC 5/C62/22 - B A - 40 Eliz - - John Chapman v John Taylor, Roger Rowley et al
Chapman, John
- STAC 5/C5/17 - B A - 43 Eliz - Essex - John Chapman v Thomas Humphrey, Edward Humphrey, Richard Ayloffe, Thomas Flacke et uxor, Thomas Shereman et al
- STAC 5/C12/25 - I D - 43 Eliz - Essex - John Chapman v Thomas Humffrey, Arthur Bett
- see STAC co Essex
Chapman, John
- STAC 7/19/23 - - - - John Chapman v Thomas Plumm et al
Chapman, Lamentation
- STAC 7/19/24 - - - - Lamentation Chapman ex parte
Chapman, Nicholas
- STAC 5/C65/29 - B A - 22 Eliz - Warwickshire - Nicholas Chapman v Thomas Phillips, Edward Frith, John Brown et al
- STAC 5/C1/30 - I D - 22 Eliz - Warwickshire - Nicholas Chapman v Robert Thickebrowe, Thomas Phillips, Nicholas Collyns, Thomas Tewe, Edward Frith et al
Chapman, Robert
- STAC 7/2/12 - - - Kent - Robert Chapman v Thomas Tottishurst
Chapman, Thomas
- STAC 5/C57/36 - B A - 20 Eliz - - Thomas Chapman v Ames Stuckley
- STAC 5/C79/13 - Rn - - - Thomas Chapman v Ames Stukeley
- STAC 5/C9/4 - I - 20 Eliz - - Thomas Chapman v Amis Stucley
Chapman, William
- STAC 5/C58/13 - B Dr - 26 Eliz - Kent - William Chapman v William Swane, Edward Maynard
- see STAC co Kent
Atorney General
- STAC 7/17/48 - - - - AG v Nicholas Chapman et al
Notes, Additions and Corrections
- STAC 7/19/24 - In 1593, the Privy Council received a “pittyfull complaint” from the aptly named Lamentation Chapman (from Leon Jackson)
- Chapman v Chapman - STAC 5/C81/27STAC 5/C37/35, STAC 5/C41/36, STAC 5/C45/22, STAC 5/C47/34, STAC 5/C69/15, STAC 5/C38/10 see STAC Chepman
- Chapman v Reeve - STAC 5/C1/32 see STAC Chepman
- Chapman v Sampson - STAC 5/C44/31 see STAC Chepman
- Chapman v Wood - STAC 5/C65/36 see STAC Chepman
