Difference between revisions of "STAC Chapman"

From Waalt
 
(6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
''' B ''' Bill of Complaint ''' Dr ''' Demurrer  ''' A ''' Answer ''' Rn ''' Replication ''' Rr ''' Rejoinder
 +
''' C ''' Commission ''' I ''' Interrogatories ''' D ''' Deposition
 +
<BR> <BR>
 +
 
''' Chapman, Beatrice '''
 
''' Chapman, Beatrice '''
−
*STAC 5/C33/2 - B Dr - 31 Eliz - Beatrice Chapman v John Plowright
+
*STAC 5/C33/2 - B Dr - 31 Eliz - - Beatrice Chapman v John Plowright
  
 
''' Chapman, Digory '''  
 
''' Chapman, Digory '''  
−
*STAC 5/C32/32 - B A C - 38 Eliz - Degory Chapman v Robert Pearse
+
*STAC 5/C32/32 - B A C - 38 Eliz - - Degory Chapman v Robert Pearse
  
 
''' Chapman, Francis '''  
 
''' Chapman, Francis '''  
−
*STAC 5/C55/20 - B Dr - 44 Eliz - Francys Chapman v Roger Alexander, Richard Redferne et al
+
*STAC 5/C55/20 - B Dr - 44 Eliz - Staffordshire - Francys Chapman v Roger Alexander, Richard Redferne et al
 +
**see [[STAC co Stafford]]
  
 
''' Chapman, James '''  
 
''' Chapman, James '''  
−
*STAC 5/C12/6 - I B A Rr Rn - 2 Eliz - James Chapman v William Pennye
+
*STAC 5/C12/6 - I B A Rr Rn - 2 Eliz - Kent - James Chapman v William Pennye
−
*STAC 5/C23/1 - I D - 3 Eliz - James Chapman v William Peny et al  
+
*STAC 5/C23/1 - I D - 3 Eliz - Kent - James Chapman v William Peny et al  
−
*STAC 5/C53/8 - I D - 3 Eliz - James Chapman v William Penny et al
+
*STAC 5/C53/8 - I D - 3 Eliz - Kent - James Chapman v William Penny et al
 +
**[[STAC co Kent]]
 +
 
 +
''' Chapman, John '''
 +
*STAC 5/C62/22 - B A - 40 Eliz - - John Chapman v John Taylor, Roger Rowley et al
 +
 
 +
''' Chapman, John '''
 +
*STAC 5/C5/17 - B A - 43 Eliz - Essex - John Chapman v Thomas Humphrey, Edward Humphrey, Richard Ayloffe, Thomas Flacke et uxor, Thomas Shereman et al
 +
*STAC 5/C12/25 - I D - 43 Eliz - Essex - John Chapman v Thomas Humffrey, Arthur Bett
 +
**see [[STAC co Essex]]
  
 
''' Chapman, John '''  
 
''' Chapman, John '''  
−
*STAC 5/C62/22 - B A - 40 Eliz - John Chapman v John Taylor, Roger Rowley et al
+
*STAC 7/19/23 - - - - John Chapman v Thomas Plumm et al
−
*STAC 5/C5/17 - B A - 43 Eliz - John Chapman v Thomas Humphrey, Edward Humphrey, Richard Ayloffe, Thomas Flacke et uxor , Thomas Shereman et al
+
 
−
*STAC 5/C12/25 - I D - 43 Eliz - John Chapman v Thomas Humffrey, Arthur Bett
+
'''Chapman, Lamentation '''
 +
*STAC 7/19/24 - - - - Lamentation Chapman ex parte
  
 
''' Chapman, Nicholas '''
 
''' Chapman, Nicholas '''
−
*STAC 5/C65/29 - B A - 22 Eliz - Nicholas Chapman v Thomas Phillips, Edward Frith, John Brown et al
+
*STAC 5/C65/29 - B A - 22 Eliz - Warwickshire - Nicholas Chapman v Thomas Phillips, Edward Frith, John Brown et al
 
*STAC 5/C1/30 - I D - 22 Eliz - Warwickshire - Nicholas Chapman v Robert Thickebrowe, Thomas Phillips, Nicholas Collyns, Thomas Tewe, Edward Frith et al   
 
*STAC 5/C1/30 - I D - 22 Eliz - Warwickshire - Nicholas Chapman v Robert Thickebrowe, Thomas Phillips, Nicholas Collyns, Thomas Tewe, Edward Frith et al   
 +
**[[STAC co Warwick]]
  
 
''' Chapman, Robert '''
 
''' Chapman, Robert '''
 
*STAC 7/2/12 - - - Kent - Robert Chapman v Thomas Tottishurst
 
*STAC 7/2/12 - - - Kent - Robert Chapman v Thomas Tottishurst
 +
**[[STAC co Kent]]
  
 
''' Chapman, Thomas '''
 
''' Chapman, Thomas '''
−
*STAC 5/C57/36 - B A - 20 Eliz - Thomas Chapman v Ames Stuckley
+
*STAC 5/C57/36 - B A - 20 Eliz - - Thomas Chapman v Ames Stuckley
−
*STAC 5/C79/13 - Rn - Thomas Chapman v Ames Stukeley
+
*STAC 5/C79/13 - Rn - - - Thomas Chapman v Ames Stukeley
−
*STAC 5/C9/4 -  I - 20 Eliz - Thomas Chapman v Amis Stucley  
+
*STAC 5/C9/4 -  I - 20 Eliz - - Thomas Chapman v Amis Stucley  
  
 
''' Chapman, William '''  
 
''' Chapman, William '''  
−
*STAC 5/C58/13 - B Dr - 26 Eliz - William Chapman v William Swane, Edward Maynard
+
*STAC 5/C58/13 - B Dr - 26 Eliz - Kent - William Chapman v William Swane, Edward Maynard
 +
**see [[STAC co Kent]]
 +
 
 +
''' Atorney General '''
 +
*STAC 7/17/48 - - - - AG v Nicholas Chapman et al
  
 
'''Notes, Additions and Corrections'''  
 
'''Notes, Additions and Corrections'''  
−
 
+
*STAC 7/19/24 - In 1593, the Privy Council received a “pittyfull complaint” from the aptly named Lamentation Chapman (from Leon Jackson)
−
*STAC 5/C1/30 In re a meadow in Dostill in Warwickshire
+
*Chapman v Chapman - STAC 5/C81/27STAC 5/C37/35, STAC 5/C41/36, STAC 5/C45/22, STAC 5/C47/34, STAC 5/C69/15, STAC 5/C38/10 see [[STAC Chepman]]
−
 
+
*Chapman v Reeve - STAC 5/C1/32 see [[STAC Chepman]]
−
*STAC 7/2/12 - TNA Note: Mills and lands in Chipsted
+
*Chapman v Sampson - STAC 5/C44/31 see [[STAC Chepman]]
−
 
+
*Chapman v Wood - STAC 5/C65/36 see [[STAC Chepman]]
−
*Biography in “The History of Parliament: the House of Commons 1558-1603,” ed. P.W. Hasler, 1981
 
−
** CHAPMAN, Henry (d.1623), of Newcastle-upon-Tyne, Northumb.
 

Latest revision as of 21:37, 4 August 2025

B Bill of Complaint Dr Demurrer A Answer Rn Replication Rr Rejoinder C Commission I Interrogatories D Deposition

Chapman, Beatrice

  • STAC 5/C33/2 - B Dr - 31 Eliz - - Beatrice Chapman v John Plowright

Chapman, Digory

  • STAC 5/C32/32 - B A C - 38 Eliz - - Degory Chapman v Robert Pearse

Chapman, Francis

  • STAC 5/C55/20 - B Dr - 44 Eliz - Staffordshire - Francys Chapman v Roger Alexander, Richard Redferne et al

Chapman, James

  • STAC 5/C12/6 - I B A Rr Rn - 2 Eliz - Kent - James Chapman v William Pennye
  • STAC 5/C23/1 - I D - 3 Eliz - Kent - James Chapman v William Peny et al
  • STAC 5/C53/8 - I D - 3 Eliz - Kent - James Chapman v William Penny et al

Chapman, John

  • STAC 5/C62/22 - B A - 40 Eliz - - John Chapman v John Taylor, Roger Rowley et al

Chapman, John

  • STAC 5/C5/17 - B A - 43 Eliz - Essex - John Chapman v Thomas Humphrey, Edward Humphrey, Richard Ayloffe, Thomas Flacke et uxor, Thomas Shereman et al
  • STAC 5/C12/25 - I D - 43 Eliz - Essex - John Chapman v Thomas Humffrey, Arthur Bett

Chapman, John

  • STAC 7/19/23 - - - - John Chapman v Thomas Plumm et al

Chapman, Lamentation

  • STAC 7/19/24 - - - - Lamentation Chapman ex parte

Chapman, Nicholas

  • STAC 5/C65/29 - B A - 22 Eliz - Warwickshire - Nicholas Chapman v Thomas Phillips, Edward Frith, John Brown et al
  • STAC 5/C1/30 - I D - 22 Eliz - Warwickshire - Nicholas Chapman v Robert Thickebrowe, Thomas Phillips, Nicholas Collyns, Thomas Tewe, Edward Frith et al

Chapman, Robert

  • STAC 7/2/12 - - - Kent - Robert Chapman v Thomas Tottishurst

Chapman, Thomas

  • STAC 5/C57/36 - B A - 20 Eliz - - Thomas Chapman v Ames Stuckley
  • STAC 5/C79/13 - Rn - - - Thomas Chapman v Ames Stukeley
  • STAC 5/C9/4 - I - 20 Eliz - - Thomas Chapman v Amis Stucley

Chapman, William

  • STAC 5/C58/13 - B Dr - 26 Eliz - Kent - William Chapman v William Swane, Edward Maynard

Atorney General

  • STAC 7/17/48 - - - - AG v Nicholas Chapman et al

Notes, Additions and Corrections

  • STAC 7/19/24 - In 1593, the Privy Council received a “pittyfull complaint” from the aptly named Lamentation Chapman (from Leon Jackson)
  • Chapman v Chapman - STAC 5/C81/27STAC 5/C37/35, STAC 5/C41/36, STAC 5/C45/22, STAC 5/C47/34, STAC 5/C69/15, STAC 5/C38/10 see STAC Chepman
  • Chapman v Reeve - STAC 5/C1/32 see STAC Chepman
  • Chapman v Sampson - STAC 5/C44/31 see STAC Chepman
  • Chapman v Wood - STAC 5/C65/36 see STAC Chepman
Retrieved from "https://waalt.uh.edu/index.php?title=STAC_Chapman&oldid=105542"