Difference between revisions of "STAC Clement"
From Waalt
(Add notes) |
|||
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | ''' B ''' Bill of Complaint ''' Dr ''' Demurrer ''' A ''' Answer ''' Rn ''' Replication ''' Rr ''' Rejoinder | ||
| + | ''' C ''' Commission ''' I ''' Interrogatories ''' D ''' Deposition | ||
| + | <BR> <BR> | ||
| + | |||
''' Clement, John ''' | ''' Clement, John ''' | ||
| − | *STAC 5/C67/2 - B A C I D - 10 Eliz - John Clement v George Dansey, Margery Serson | + | *STAC 5/C67/2 - B A C I D - 10 Eliz - - John Clement v George Dansey, Margery Serson |
| − | *STAC 5/C11/8 - I D - 9 Eliz - John Clement v Symon Serson, George Dansey | + | *STAC 5/C11/8 - I D - 9 Eliz - - John Clement v Symon Serson, George Dansey |
| − | *STAC 5/C29/26 - I D - 9 Eliz - John Clement v George Dansey, Simon Sersey et al | + | *STAC 5/C29/26 - I D - 9 Eliz - - John Clement v George Dansey, Simon Sersey et al |
| − | *STAC 5/C79/35 - B - John Clement v Margery Symon, John Symon | + | *STAC 5/C79/35 - B - - - John Clement v Margery Symon, John Symon |
''' Clement, Nicholas ''' | ''' Clement, Nicholas ''' | ||
| − | *STAC 5/C5/24 - B A Rn C I D - 33 Eliz - Nicholas Clement v John Latham, Thomas Goddard, Launcelot Danyel, William Robinson | + | *STAC 5/C5/24 - B A Rn C I D - 33 Eliz - - Nicholas Clement v John Latham, Thomas Goddard, Launcelot Danyel, William Robinson |
| − | *STAC 5/C71/14 - I D - 33 Eliz - Nicholas Clement v John Latham, Thomas Goddard | + | *STAC 5/C71/14 - I D - 33 Eliz - - Nicholas Clement v John Latham, Thomas Goddard |
| − | *STAC 5/C65/20 - B A - 35 Eliz - Nicholas Clement v William Wirdnam | + | **probably also [[STAC Latham]] STAC 5/L23/37 John Latham, Thomas Goddard v William Villiers, Nicholas Clements |
| − | *STAC 5/C12/21 - I D Rn - 35 Eliz - Nicholas Clement v William Wordnam | + | |
| + | ''' Clement, Nicholas ''' | ||
| + | *STAC 5/C65/20 - B A - 35 Eliz - Berkshire - Nicholas Clement v William Wirdnam | ||
| + | *STAC 5/C12/21 - I D Rn - 35 Eliz - Berkshire - Nicholas Clement v William Wordnam | ||
| + | **see [[STAC co Berkshire]] | ||
''' Clement, Richard ''' | ''' Clement, Richard ''' | ||
| − | *STAC 5/C3/14 - B A Rn C I D - 6 Eliz - Richard Clement v Luke Bewforest, Roger French, John Spencer, Thomas Feachyld, Roger Brown et al | + | *STAC 5/C3/14 - B A Rn C I D - 6 Eliz - - Oxfordshire - Richard Clement v Luke Bewforest, Roger French, John Spencer, Thomas Feachyld, Roger Brown et al |
| + | **see [[STAC co Oxford]] | ||
''' Clement, Robert ''' | ''' Clement, Robert ''' | ||
| − | *STAC 5/STAC 5/C39/8 - B - Robert Clement v Robert Neal, Nicholas Neal, John Softly | + | *STAC 5/STAC 5/C39/8 - B - - - Robert Clement v Robert Neal, Nicholas Neal, John Softly |
''' Clement, Thomas ''' | ''' Clement, Thomas ''' | ||
| − | *STAC 5/C33/39 - B - 24 Eliz - Thomas Clement, Thomas Gamways v Thomas Hannam, Roger Keale et al | + | *STAC 5/C33/39 - B - 24 Eliz - - Thomas Clement, Thomas Gamways v Thomas Hannam, Roger Keale et al |
| − | *STAC 5/C78/38 - Dr - Thomas Clement, Thomas Jamwaies v Thomas Martin et al | + | *STAC 5/C78/38 - Dr - - - Thomas Clement, Thomas Jamwaies v Thomas Martin et al |
''' Clement, William ''' | ''' Clement, William ''' | ||
| − | *STAC 5/C33/18 - B A - 43 Eliz - William Clement v Henry Newdigate, Thomas Moseley, John Smith | + | *STAC 5/C33/18 - B A - 43 Eliz - Middlesex - William Clement v Henry Newdigate, Thomas Moseley, John Smith |
| − | *STAC 5/C17/27 - I D - 44 Eliz - William Clement v Henry Newdigate, Thomas Moselye et al | + | *STAC 5/C17/27 - I D - 44 Eliz - Middlesex - William Clement v Henry Newdigate, Thomas Moselye et al |
| − | + | **see [[STAC co Middlesex]] | |
| + | ''' Attorney General ''' | ||
| + | *STAC 5/A36/26 - I D - 45 Eliz - - AG v Francis Clement et al | ||
| + | *STAC 5/A49/8 - A - 44 Eliz - - AG v Francis Clement, Thomas Prior, Nicholas Hunt | ||
'''Notes, Additions and Corrections:''' | '''Notes, Additions and Corrections:''' | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
Latest revision as of 15:04, 3 August 2025
B Bill of Complaint Dr Demurrer A Answer Rn Replication Rr Rejoinder
C Commission I Interrogatories D Deposition
Clement, John
- STAC 5/C67/2 - B A C I D - 10 Eliz - - John Clement v George Dansey, Margery Serson
- STAC 5/C11/8 - I D - 9 Eliz - - John Clement v Symon Serson, George Dansey
- STAC 5/C29/26 - I D - 9 Eliz - - John Clement v George Dansey, Simon Sersey et al
- STAC 5/C79/35 - B - - - John Clement v Margery Symon, John Symon
Clement, Nicholas
- STAC 5/C5/24 - B A Rn C I D - 33 Eliz - - Nicholas Clement v John Latham, Thomas Goddard, Launcelot Danyel, William Robinson
- STAC 5/C71/14 - I D - 33 Eliz - - Nicholas Clement v John Latham, Thomas Goddard
- probably also STAC Latham STAC 5/L23/37 John Latham, Thomas Goddard v William Villiers, Nicholas Clements
Clement, Nicholas
- STAC 5/C65/20 - B A - 35 Eliz - Berkshire - Nicholas Clement v William Wirdnam
- STAC 5/C12/21 - I D Rn - 35 Eliz - Berkshire - Nicholas Clement v William Wordnam
Clement, Richard
- STAC 5/C3/14 - B A Rn C I D - 6 Eliz - - Oxfordshire - Richard Clement v Luke Bewforest, Roger French, John Spencer, Thomas Feachyld, Roger Brown et al
- see STAC co Oxford
Clement, Robert
- STAC 5/STAC 5/C39/8 - B - - - Robert Clement v Robert Neal, Nicholas Neal, John Softly
Clement, Thomas
- STAC 5/C33/39 - B - 24 Eliz - - Thomas Clement, Thomas Gamways v Thomas Hannam, Roger Keale et al
- STAC 5/C78/38 - Dr - - - Thomas Clement, Thomas Jamwaies v Thomas Martin et al
Clement, William
- STAC 5/C33/18 - B A - 43 Eliz - Middlesex - William Clement v Henry Newdigate, Thomas Moseley, John Smith
- STAC 5/C17/27 - I D - 44 Eliz - Middlesex - William Clement v Henry Newdigate, Thomas Moselye et al
Attorney General
- STAC 5/A36/26 - I D - 45 Eliz - - AG v Francis Clement et al
- STAC 5/A49/8 - A - 44 Eliz - - AG v Francis Clement, Thomas Prior, Nicholas Hunt
Notes, Additions and Corrections:
