Difference between revisions of "STAC Gellibrand"
From Waalt
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | ''' B ''' Bill of Complaint ''' Dr ''' Demurrer ''' A ''' Answer ''' Rn ''' Replication ''' Rr ''' Rejoinder | ||
| + | ''' C ''' Commission ''' I ''' Interrogatories ''' D ''' Deposition | ||
| + | <BR> <BR> | ||
| + | |||
| + | ''' Gellibrand, Thomas ''' | ||
| + | *STAC 5/G16/5 - I D - 36 Eliz - - Thomas Gyllyboome v Roger Hubberd | ||
| + | *STAC 5/G12/28 - I D - 35 Eliz - - Thomas Gellibrand v Roger Hubberd | ||
| + | *STAC 5/G22/3 - I D - 34 Eliz - - Thomas Gellibrond v Roger Hubbard | ||
| + | *STAC 5/G23/13 - I D - 35 Eliz - - Thomas Gollybrande v Roger Hubbard | ||
| + | |||
''' Gellibrand, Thomas ''' | ''' Gellibrand, Thomas ''' | ||
*STAC 5/G32/9 - Rn - 41 Eliz - Thomas Gellibronde, Martha Gellibronde v Roger Booth et al | *STAC 5/G32/9 - Rn - 41 Eliz - Thomas Gellibronde, Martha Gellibronde v Roger Booth et al | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | '''Notes, Additions and Corrections''' | |
| − | *STAC 5/G22/3 - | + | *STAC 5/G22/3 et al - Case Book BL Harley MS 2143 fo. 15v. Fines made void. Gillibrond and Hubard: a fine damned in this court in this cause, which was the first of this kind; and Sir George Reynalls wife’s fine being acknowledged and yet referred by the court, which was because she was not at full age before it was annihilated, which had she been otherwise. (kk) |
| − | |||
Revision as of 15:28, 25 February 2024
B Bill of Complaint Dr Demurrer A Answer Rn Replication Rr Rejoinder
C Commission I Interrogatories D Deposition
Gellibrand, Thomas
- STAC 5/G16/5 - I D - 36 Eliz - - Thomas Gyllyboome v Roger Hubberd
- STAC 5/G12/28 - I D - 35 Eliz - - Thomas Gellibrand v Roger Hubberd
- STAC 5/G22/3 - I D - 34 Eliz - - Thomas Gellibrond v Roger Hubbard
- STAC 5/G23/13 - I D - 35 Eliz - - Thomas Gollybrande v Roger Hubbard
Gellibrand, Thomas
- STAC 5/G32/9 - Rn - 41 Eliz - Thomas Gellibronde, Martha Gellibronde v Roger Booth et al
Notes, Additions and Corrections
- STAC 5/G22/3 et al - Case Book BL Harley MS 2143 fo. 15v. Fines made void. Gillibrond and Hubard: a fine damned in this court in this cause, which was the first of this kind; and Sir George Reynalls wife’s fine being acknowledged and yet referred by the court, which was because she was not at full age before it was annihilated, which had she been otherwise. (kk)
