Difference between revisions of "STAC Laughton"
From Waalt
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | ''' B ''' Bill of Complaint ''' Dr ''' Demurrer ''' A ''' Answer ''' Rn ''' Replication ''' Rr ''' Rejoinder | ||
| + | ''' C ''' Commission ''' I ''' Interrogatories ''' D ''' Deposition | ||
| + | <BR> <BR> | ||
| + | |||
''' Laughton, Christopher ''' | ''' Laughton, Christopher ''' | ||
| − | *STAC 5/L41/33 - B - Christopher Laughton v George Sympson, Francis Pitt et al | + | *STAC 5/L41/33 - B - - Christopher Laughton v George Sympson, Francis Pitt et al |
''' Lowghton, Edmond ''' | ''' Lowghton, Edmond ''' | ||
| − | *STAC 5/L47/6 - B - 41 Eliz - Edmond Lowghton v Thomas Turner | + | *STAC 5/L47/6 - B - 41 Eliz - - Edmond Lowghton v Thomas Turner |
| + | **probably also [[STAC Turner]] STAC 5/T28/40 Thomas Turner v Edmond Lawton | ||
''' Laughton, James ''' | ''' Laughton, James ''' | ||
| − | *STAC 5/L29/9 - C I D - 43 Eliz - James Laughton, John Smith et al v John Pickes, Ellis Northerne et al | + | *STAC 5/L29/9 - C I D - 43 Eliz - - James Laughton, John Smith et al v John Pickes, Ellis Northerne et al |
| + | |||
| + | ''' Laughton, John ''' | ||
| + | *STAC 5/L45/32 - I D - 31 Eliz - - John Laughton v Thomas Gustard | ||
| + | *STAC 5/L36/29 - I D - 31 Eliz - - John Laughton v William Walcott, John Rawlinge | ||
''' Laughton, John ''' | ''' Laughton, John ''' | ||
| − | + | *STAC 5/L22/40 - B A - 38 Eliz - - John Laughton v Edmund Cony, Benjamin Donabie et al | |
| − | + | *STAC 5/L35/9 - Rn - 38 Eliz - - John Laughton v Edmond Cony, Thomas Skill et al | |
| − | *STAC 5/L22/40 - B A - 38 Eliz - John Laughton v Edmund Cony, Benjamin Donabie et al | + | *STAC 5/L26/8 - I D - 38 Eliz - - John Laughton v Edmond Cony, Thomas Skell et al |
| − | *STAC 5/L35/9 - Rn - 38 Eliz - John Laughton v Edmond Cony, Thomas Skill et al | + | *STAC 5/L8/35 - C I D - 39 Eliz - - John Langhton v Edmond Conye |
| − | *STAC 5/L26/8 - I D - 38 Eliz - John Laughton v Edmond Cony, Thomas Skell et al | ||
| − | *STAC 5/L8/35 - C I D - 39 Eliz - John Langhton v Edmond Conye | ||
| − | ''' | + | ''' Notes, Additions and Corrections''' |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
*Lawton v Smith - STAC 5/L23/22 see [[STAC Lawton]] | *Lawton v Smith - STAC 5/L23/22 see [[STAC Lawton]] | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
*Lawton v Worrall - STAC 5/L4/2 see [[STAC Lawton]] | *Lawton v Worrall - STAC 5/L4/2 see [[STAC Lawton]] | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
Latest revision as of 10:38, 11 February 2024
B Bill of Complaint Dr Demurrer A Answer Rn Replication Rr Rejoinder
C Commission I Interrogatories D Deposition
Laughton, Christopher
- STAC 5/L41/33 - B - - Christopher Laughton v George Sympson, Francis Pitt et al
Lowghton, Edmond
- STAC 5/L47/6 - B - 41 Eliz - - Edmond Lowghton v Thomas Turner
- probably also STAC Turner STAC 5/T28/40 Thomas Turner v Edmond Lawton
Laughton, James
- STAC 5/L29/9 - C I D - 43 Eliz - - James Laughton, John Smith et al v John Pickes, Ellis Northerne et al
Laughton, John
- STAC 5/L45/32 - I D - 31 Eliz - - John Laughton v Thomas Gustard
- STAC 5/L36/29 - I D - 31 Eliz - - John Laughton v William Walcott, John Rawlinge
Laughton, John
- STAC 5/L22/40 - B A - 38 Eliz - - John Laughton v Edmund Cony, Benjamin Donabie et al
- STAC 5/L35/9 - Rn - 38 Eliz - - John Laughton v Edmond Cony, Thomas Skill et al
- STAC 5/L26/8 - I D - 38 Eliz - - John Laughton v Edmond Cony, Thomas Skell et al
- STAC 5/L8/35 - C I D - 39 Eliz - - John Langhton v Edmond Conye
Notes, Additions and Corrections
- Lawton v Smith - STAC 5/L23/22 see STAC Lawton
- Lawton v Worrall - STAC 5/L4/2 see STAC Lawton
