Difference between revisions of "STAC Leeds"
From Waalt
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | ''' B ''' Bill of Complaint ''' Dr ''' Demurrer ''' A ''' Answer ''' Rn ''' Replication ''' Rr ''' Rejoinder | ||
| + | ''' C ''' Commission ''' I ''' Interrogatories ''' D ''' Deposition | ||
| + | <BR> <BR> | ||
| + | |||
''' Leedes, Abraham ''' | ''' Leedes, Abraham ''' | ||
| − | *STAC 5/L32/33 - B - 34 Eliz - Abraham Leedes v Henry Pickes, Robert Bland | + | *STAC 5/L32/33 - B - 34 Eliz - - Abraham Leedes v Henry Pickes, Robert Bland |
| − | *STAC 5/L22/30 - I D - 36 Eliz - Abraham Leedes v Henry Pickes et al | + | *STAC 5/L22/30 - I D - 36 Eliz - - Abraham Leedes v Henry Pickes et al |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
''' Leedes, Edward''' | ''' Leedes, Edward''' | ||
| − | *STAC 5/L47/6 - B - 45 Eliz - Edward Leedes v Peter Whyte, Matthew Godwyn et al | + | *STAC 5/L47/6 - B - 45 Eliz - - Edward Leedes v Peter Whyte, Matthew Godwyn et al |
| − | *STAC 5/L11/39 - I D - 2 Eliz - Edward Leeds v Edmund Forde, Henry Yonge et al | + | *STAC 5/L11/39 - I D - 2 Eliz - - Edward Leeds v Edmund Forde, Henry Yonge et al |
| − | *STAC 5/L49/27 - A - 45 Eliz - Edward Ledes v Peter White clericus et al | + | *STAC 5/L49/27 - A - 45 Eliz - - Edward Ledes v Peter White clericus et al |
| + | **probably also [[STAC White]] STAC 5/W4/35 Peter White v Edward Leeds | ||
| − | ''' Leeds, Thomas''' | + | ''' Leeds, Thomas and Anne ''' |
| − | *STAC 5/L2/32 - B A Rn - Hil 29 Eliz - Thomas Leeds v Henry Skargall | + | *STAC 5/L2/32 - B A Rn - Hil 29 Eliz - - Thomas Leeds v Henry Skargall |
| + | *STAC 5/L47/2 - I D - 29 Eliz - - Ann Ledes, Thomas Ledes v Henry Stargill | ||
| + | *STAC 5/L38/3 - I D - 29 Eliz - - Anne Ledes, Thomas Ledes v Henry Scargill | ||
| + | **see also TNA C 2/Eliz/S7/28 Henry Scargill v Thomas Leeds and his wife. Claim by descent, in tail remainder. Manors of Roche, Gartford and Eccleshill in the town and fields of Roche Gartford, Yorkshire and Eccleshill, Yorkshire. | ||
''' Leedes, William''' | ''' Leedes, William''' | ||
| − | *STAC 5/L49/9 - B A - - William Leedes v Edmund Fowrd, William Russel et al | + | *STAC 5/L49/9 - B A - - - William Leedes v Edmund Fowrd, William Russel et al |
| − | *STAC 5/L28/31 - B A - 35 Eliz - William Leeds v Edward Bigge, William Symms et al | + | *STAC 5/L28/31 - B A - 35 Eliz - - William Leeds v Edward Bigge, William Symms et al |
'''Notes, Additions and Corrections''' | '''Notes, Additions and Corrections''' | ||
Latest revision as of 21:22, 10 February 2024
B Bill of Complaint Dr Demurrer A Answer Rn Replication Rr Rejoinder
C Commission I Interrogatories D Deposition
Leedes, Abraham
- STAC 5/L32/33 - B - 34 Eliz - - Abraham Leedes v Henry Pickes, Robert Bland
- STAC 5/L22/30 - I D - 36 Eliz - - Abraham Leedes v Henry Pickes et al
Leedes, Edward
- STAC 5/L47/6 - B - 45 Eliz - - Edward Leedes v Peter Whyte, Matthew Godwyn et al
- STAC 5/L11/39 - I D - 2 Eliz - - Edward Leeds v Edmund Forde, Henry Yonge et al
- STAC 5/L49/27 - A - 45 Eliz - - Edward Ledes v Peter White clericus et al
- probably also STAC White STAC 5/W4/35 Peter White v Edward Leeds
Leeds, Thomas and Anne
- STAC 5/L2/32 - B A Rn - Hil 29 Eliz - - Thomas Leeds v Henry Skargall
- STAC 5/L47/2 - I D - 29 Eliz - - Ann Ledes, Thomas Ledes v Henry Stargill
- STAC 5/L38/3 - I D - 29 Eliz - - Anne Ledes, Thomas Ledes v Henry Scargill
- see also TNA C 2/Eliz/S7/28 Henry Scargill v Thomas Leeds and his wife. Claim by descent, in tail remainder. Manors of Roche, Gartford and Eccleshill in the town and fields of Roche Gartford, Yorkshire and Eccleshill, Yorkshire.
Leedes, William
- STAC 5/L49/9 - B A - - - William Leedes v Edmund Fowrd, William Russel et al
- STAC 5/L28/31 - B A - 35 Eliz - - William Leeds v Edward Bigge, William Symms et al
Notes, Additions and Corrections
