Difference between revisions of "STAC Ley"
From Waalt
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | ''' B ''' Bill of Complaint ''' Dr ''' Demurrer ''' A ''' Answer ''' Rn ''' Replication ''' Rr ''' Rejoinder | ||
| + | ''' C ''' Commission ''' I ''' Interrogatories ''' D ''' Deposition | ||
| + | <BR> <BR> | ||
| + | |||
| + | ''' Ley, John''' | ||
| + | *STAC 5/L12/16 - B - 25 Eliz - Bristol - John Ley v Robert Kitchin | ||
| + | **see [[STAC co Bristol]] | ||
| + | |||
''' Ley, John''' | ''' Ley, John''' | ||
| − | + | *STAC 5/L14/15 - B A - 35 Eliz - - John Ley v William Crosse, Richard Flower et al | |
| − | *STAC 5/L14/15 - B A - 35 Eliz - John Ley v William Crosse, Richard Flower et al | + | *STAC 5/L11/38 - I D - 36 Eliz - - John Ley v Edward Foster |
| − | *STAC 5/L11/38 - I D - 36 Eliz - John Ley v Edward Foster | + | *STAC 5/L5/20 - Rn - 36 Eliz - - John Ley v William Crosse, Edward Foster |
| − | *STAC 5/L5/20 - Rn - 36 Eliz - John Ley v William Crosse, Edward Foster | + | *STAC 5/L44/26 - I D - 39 Eliz - - John Lee v Thomas Crosse et al |
| − | *STAC 5/L44/26 - I D - 39 Eliz - John Lee v Thomas Crosse et al | + | |
| + | ''' Ley, Richard ''' | ||
| + | *STAC 5/L1/16 - B A Rn - 33 Eliz - - Richard Ley v John Pyne, Thomas Punchard, Christopher Barrowe | ||
| + | *STAC 5/L28/2 - I D - 33 Eliz - - Richard Ley v John Pyne | ||
| + | |||
| + | ''' Ley, Richard ''' | ||
| + | *STAC 5/L41/31 - B A Rn Rr C I D - 35 Eliz - - Richard Ley v Philip Pyner, Humfry Quick et al | ||
| + | *STAC 5/L9/31 - I D - 35 Eliz - - Richard Lee v Philip Pine, George Slee et al | ||
''' Ley, Richard ''' | ''' Ley, Richard ''' | ||
| − | *STAC 5/ | + | *STAC 5/L47/6 - B - 44 Eliz - - Richard Lye v John Crosse, Robert Nicolls et al |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
''' Ley, William ''' | ''' Ley, William ''' | ||
| − | *STAC 5/L48/14 - B - - William Ley v Roger Hayter, John Hayter et al | + | *STAC 5/L48/14 - B - - - William Ley v Roger Hayter, John Hayter et al |
| − | *STAC 5/L1/5 - C I D - 49 Eliz - William Ley, Alexander Ley, Robert Winter v Humphrey Windham, Henry Norman, Augustine Norman, Peter Rowswell, John Credie | + | *STAC 5/L1/5 - C I D - 49 Eliz - - William Ley, Alexander Ley, Robert Winter v Humphrey Windham, Henry Norman, Augustine Norman, Peter Rowswell, John Credie |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | '''Notes, Additions and Corrections''' | + | '''Notes, Additions and Corrections''' |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
Latest revision as of 21:03, 10 February 2024
B Bill of Complaint Dr Demurrer A Answer Rn Replication Rr Rejoinder
C Commission I Interrogatories D Deposition
Ley, John
- STAC 5/L12/16 - B - 25 Eliz - Bristol - John Ley v Robert Kitchin
- see STAC co Bristol
Ley, John
- STAC 5/L14/15 - B A - 35 Eliz - - John Ley v William Crosse, Richard Flower et al
- STAC 5/L11/38 - I D - 36 Eliz - - John Ley v Edward Foster
- STAC 5/L5/20 - Rn - 36 Eliz - - John Ley v William Crosse, Edward Foster
- STAC 5/L44/26 - I D - 39 Eliz - - John Lee v Thomas Crosse et al
Ley, Richard
- STAC 5/L1/16 - B A Rn - 33 Eliz - - Richard Ley v John Pyne, Thomas Punchard, Christopher Barrowe
- STAC 5/L28/2 - I D - 33 Eliz - - Richard Ley v John Pyne
Ley, Richard
- STAC 5/L41/31 - B A Rn Rr C I D - 35 Eliz - - Richard Ley v Philip Pyner, Humfry Quick et al
- STAC 5/L9/31 - I D - 35 Eliz - - Richard Lee v Philip Pine, George Slee et al
Ley, Richard
- STAC 5/L47/6 - B - 44 Eliz - - Richard Lye v John Crosse, Robert Nicolls et al
Ley, William
- STAC 5/L48/14 - B - - - William Ley v Roger Hayter, John Hayter et al
- STAC 5/L1/5 - C I D - 49 Eliz - - William Ley, Alexander Ley, Robert Winter v Humphrey Windham, Henry Norman, Augustine Norman, Peter Rowswell, John Credie
Notes, Additions and Corrections
