Difference between revisions of "STAC Stuckeley"

From Waalt
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
''' B ''' Bill of Complaint ''' Dr ''' Demurrer  ''' A ''' Answer ''' Rn ''' Replication ''' Rr ''' Rejoinder
 +
''' C ''' Commission ''' I ''' Interrogatories ''' D ''' Deposition
 +
<BR> <BR>
 +
 +
''' Stukeley, Hugh '''
 +
*STAC 5/S20/17 - B A C - 17 Eliz - - Hugh Stukeley v John Wilkins, John Morice et al
 +
*STAC 5/S64/11 - I D - 17 Eliz - - Hugh Stukley v John Harcombe, Thomas Wake et al
 +
*STAC 5/S54/11 - I D - 17 Eliz - - Hughe Stukely v Peter Bowdon
 +
*STAC 5/S47/30 - I D - 17 Eliz - - Hugh Stukele v John Wilkins
 +
 +
''' Stukeley, Hugh '''
 +
*STAC 5/S24/15 - B A Rn C I D - 20 Eliz - - Hugh Stukeley v Thomas Aldwin, John Curre et al
 +
*STAC 5/S85/36 - B - - - Henry Stewkley v Thomas Aldwyn, John Cure et al
 +
*STAC 5/S8/33 - I D - 21 Eliz - - Hugo Stuckeley v Thomas Aldwyne, Robert Reynolds et al
 +
 
''' Stukeley, Hugh '''
 
''' Stukeley, Hugh '''
*STAC 5/S20/17 - B A C - 17 Eliz - Hugh Stukeley v John Wilkins, John Morice et al
+
*STAC 5/S65/34 - B A - 21 Eliz - - Hugh Stukeley v William Darrell, John More et al
*STAC 5/S64/11 - I D - 17 Eliz - Hugh Stukley v John Harcombe, Thomas Wake et al
+
*STAC 5/S42/28 - B A - 22 Eliz - - Hugh Stuckley v Steven Apleford, William Durelly et al
*STAC 5/S54/11 - I D - 17 Eliz - Hughe Stukely v Peter Bowdon
+
*STAC 5/S53/34 - I D - 22 Eliz - - Hugh Stukely v William Darrell, Thomas Whiteway
*STAC 5/S47/30 - I D - 17 Eliz - Hugh Stukele v John Wilkins
+
*STAC 5/S14/12 - I D - 22 Eliz - - Henry Stukeley v William Darrell
*STAC 5/S24/15 - B A Rn C I D - 20 Eliz - Hugh Stukeley v Thomas Aldwin, John Curre et al
+
*STAC 5/S81/15 - I D - 22 Eliz - - Hugh Stinckley v Catherine Wilson, William Darrell et al  
*STAC 5/S85/36 - B - - Henry Stewkley v Thomas Aldwyn, John Cure et al
+
**see also [[STAC Darrell]] STAC 5/D1/36 - B C A - 22 Eliz - - William Darrell v Hugh Stucley
*STAC 5/S65/34 - B A - 21 Eliz - Hugh Stukeley v William Darrell, John More et al
+
**see just possibly STAC 8/191/9514  William Darell states that on 23 September 1577 a gang called the Brownes assaulted one Thomas Brynde in front of his house in the petitioner's lordship of Wanborough, so that he died of his wounds, and that they had previously threatened him with death. The Brownes were indicted of murder by the petitioner, but he has been sued on this by Sir Henry Knevell, and the matter brought before the council; and several suits involving the petitioner are now awaiting trial. He protests his innocence and begs the Queen's grace. mention of Hugh Stucley of London and also [[STAC Stuckeley]]
*STAC 5/S8/33 - I D - 21 Eliz - Hugo Stuckeley v Thomas Aldwyne, Robert Reynolds et al
 
*STAC 5/S53/34 - I D - 22 Eliz - Hugh Stukely v William Darrell, Thomas Whiteway
 
*STAC 5/S14/12 - I D - 22 Eliz - Henry Stukeley v William Darrell
 
*STAC 5/S42/28 - B A - 22 Eliz - Hugh Stuckley v Steven Apleford, William Durelly et al
 
*STAC 5/S81/15 - I D - 22 Eliz - Hugh Stinckley v Catherine Wilson, William Darrell et al
 
  
 
''' Stuckey, Martin '''
 
''' Stuckey, Martin '''
*STAC 5/S48/3 - B - 16 Eliz - Martin Stuckey v John Bristow, John Whilehed et al
+
*STAC 5/S48/3 - B - 16 Eliz - - Martin Stuckey v John Bristow, John Whilehed et al
 
 
''' Bevan Case Index '''
 
*Stukeley v Aldwin - STAC 5/S85/36, STAC 5/S24/15
 
*Stukeley v Appleford - STAC 5/S42/28
 
*Stukeley v Bristowe - STAC 5/S48/3
 
*Stukeley v Darrell - STAC 5/S14/12, STAC 5/S65/34, STAC 5/S8/33, STAC 5/S53/34, STAC 5/S81/15
 
*Stukeley v Wilkins - STAC 5/S20/17, STAC 5/S47/30, STAC 5/S54/11, STAC 5/S64/11
 
  
'''Notes, Additions and Corrections '''
+
''' Notes, Additions and Corrections '''

Latest revision as of 13:11, 31 January 2024

B Bill of Complaint Dr Demurrer A Answer Rn Replication Rr Rejoinder C Commission I Interrogatories D Deposition

Stukeley, Hugh

  • STAC 5/S20/17 - B A C - 17 Eliz - - Hugh Stukeley v John Wilkins, John Morice et al
  • STAC 5/S64/11 - I D - 17 Eliz - - Hugh Stukley v John Harcombe, Thomas Wake et al
  • STAC 5/S54/11 - I D - 17 Eliz - - Hughe Stukely v Peter Bowdon
  • STAC 5/S47/30 - I D - 17 Eliz - - Hugh Stukele v John Wilkins

Stukeley, Hugh

  • STAC 5/S24/15 - B A Rn C I D - 20 Eliz - - Hugh Stukeley v Thomas Aldwin, John Curre et al
  • STAC 5/S85/36 - B - - - Henry Stewkley v Thomas Aldwyn, John Cure et al
  • STAC 5/S8/33 - I D - 21 Eliz - - Hugo Stuckeley v Thomas Aldwyne, Robert Reynolds et al

Stukeley, Hugh

  • STAC 5/S65/34 - B A - 21 Eliz - - Hugh Stukeley v William Darrell, John More et al
  • STAC 5/S42/28 - B A - 22 Eliz - - Hugh Stuckley v Steven Apleford, William Durelly et al
  • STAC 5/S53/34 - I D - 22 Eliz - - Hugh Stukely v William Darrell, Thomas Whiteway
  • STAC 5/S14/12 - I D - 22 Eliz - - Henry Stukeley v William Darrell
  • STAC 5/S81/15 - I D - 22 Eliz - - Hugh Stinckley v Catherine Wilson, William Darrell et al
    • see also STAC Darrell STAC 5/D1/36 - B C A - 22 Eliz - - William Darrell v Hugh Stucley
    • see just possibly STAC 8/191/9514  William Darell states that on 23 September 1577 a gang called the Brownes assaulted one Thomas Brynde in front of his house in the petitioner's lordship of Wanborough, so that he died of his wounds, and that they had previously threatened him with death. The Brownes were indicted of murder by the petitioner, but he has been sued on this by Sir Henry Knevell, and the matter brought before the council; and several suits involving the petitioner are now awaiting trial. He protests his innocence and begs the Queen's grace. mention of Hugh Stucley of London and also STAC Stuckeley

Stuckey, Martin

  • STAC 5/S48/3 - B - 16 Eliz - - Martin Stuckey v John Bristow, John Whilehed et al

Notes, Additions and Corrections